Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:29:44.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD SPECIES OF LEPTOTELEIA KIEFFER (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE), EGG PARASITES OF CRICKETS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Leptoteleia of the New World is revised. Twenty-five species are recognized, of which 23 are new to science: L. alexandrae ♀ (Brazil), L. americana ♀ ♂ (USA), L. andreai ♀ (Cuba), L. annarum ♀ (Brazil), L. ferdinandi ♀ (Dominican Republic), L. jarmilae ♀ (Ecuador), L. josephi ♀ (Dominican Republic), L. kareli ♂ (Jamaica), L. lubomiri ♀ ♂ (Dominican Republic), L. majkae ♀ (Panama), L. marcelae ♀ ♂ (Brazil, Paraguay), L. mariae♀ ♂ (Argentina), L. marketae ♀ (Brazil), L. martae ♀ (USA), L. miladae ♀ ♂ (Brazil), L. monicae ♀ (Dominican Republic), L. normani ♀ ♂ (USA), L. petrum ♀ (Bélize), L. radeki ♀ (Dominican Republic), L. stani ♀ ♂ (Dominican Republic), L. vaclavi ♀ (USA), L. verae ♀ (Brazil), and L. zdenae ♀ ♂ (Peru). The two previously described species, L. oecanthi (Riley) ♀ ♂ and L. arndti Dozier ♀, are redescribed. Generic diagnosis of Leptoteleia and the key to New World species are given. The higher classification, interrelationships, and distribution of Leptoteleia species are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 4 , 01 April 1978 , pp. 353 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arndt, C. H. and Dozier, H. L.. 1931. Le criquet Haitien du cafeier. Bull. Serv. tech. Dep. Agric. Haiti 26: 7–16.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. 1893. A monograph of the North American Proctotrypidae. d2Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 45. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Ayers, H. 1884. On the development of Oecanthus niveus and its parasite, Teleas. Mem. Bost. Soc. nat. Hist. 3: 225–281, 41 figs., pls. 18–25.Google Scholar
Dodd, A. P. 1913. Australian Hymenoptera Proctotrypoidea. No. 1. Family Scelionidae. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr. 37: 130–180.Google Scholar
Dodd, A. P. 1914. Further additions to the Australian Proctotrypoidea. Arch. Naturgesch. 79A: 77–91.Google Scholar
Dodd, A. P. 1916. Australian Hymenoptera: Proctotrypoidea, No. 4. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr. 40: 9–32.Google Scholar
Galloway, I.D. 1976. The types of Australian species of the subfamily Scelioninae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Ql. J. Agric. & Anim. Sci. 33(1): 83–114.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1908. Revision des Scelionidae (Hyménoptères). Annls. Soc. scient. Brux. 32: 111–250, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1926. Scelionidae. Das Tierreich 48. Gruyter, Berlin und Leipzig. 885 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1964. A comparison of some Nearctic and Palearctic genera of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) with revisional notes. Acta Soc. ent. Cechosl. 61: 123–155.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1976. Revisionary notes and keys to world genera of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 97. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. and Muesebeck, C. F. W.. 1968. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the United States National Museum. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 270. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. 1958. In Krombein, K. V. et al. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2 (Suppl. 1). U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C.305 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and Walkley, L. M.. 1951. In Muesebeck, et al. , Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C.1420 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and Walkley, L. M.. 1956. Type species of the genera and subgenera of parasitic wasps comprising the superfamily Proctotrupoidea (Order Hymenoptera). Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 105: 319–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. 1931. On some new South African Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera). Eos 7: 355–382, 8 figs.Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1956. Proctotrupides Scelionini de Madagascar (Hyménoptères). Rev. franc. Ent. Paris 23: 244–264, 4 figs.Google Scholar
Silva, P. 1945. Esclarecimentos sobre Baryconus sp. (Hym. Scelionidae), parasita dos ovos do Oecanthus sp. (Orthop. Oecanthidae). Boln. Soc. brasil Agron. 7(4): 451–453, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Szabo, J. B. 1962. Untersuchungen an palearktischen Proctotrupiden I–IV. (Hymenoptera). I. Untersuchungen der verkannten Gattung Baryconus Foerster, 1856 von verschiedenen Gesichtpunkten (Hym. Proctotrupoidea, Scelionidae). Folia ent. 15(11): 222–232.Google Scholar