Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:14:04.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

REVISION OF THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF LAUXANIA (DIPTERA: LAUXANIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Joëlle R. Pérusse
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 3V9
Terry A. Wheeler*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 3V9
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

The North American species of Lauxania Latreille are revised. The genus contains five Nearctic species: L. albiseta Coquillett, L. glabrifronssp.nov., L. kafaristasp.nov., L. nigrimana Coquillett, and L. shewellisp.nov. All Nearctic species are illustrated and keyed. Consistent genitalic differences between Nearctic and Palaearctic specimens of the species usually identified as Lauxania cylindricornis (Fabricius) justify the recognition of the Nearctic specimens as a distinct species (L. shewelli). The male genitalia of Lauxania represent two types: the apparently plesiomorphic type has a simple rodlike phallapodeme, membranous phallus, and pointed unbranched postgonites; the apomorphic type has the phallapodeme expanded into a sclerotized hood surrounding the base of the phallus, a convoluted sclerotized phallus, and branched postgonites. These two genitalic types also occur in the related genus Calliopum Strand, which provides strong evidence that these genera, as currently recognized, may not be monophyletic relative to one another.

Résumé

Les espèces nord américaines du genre Lauxania Latreille sont révisées. Ce genre regroupe cinq espèces néarctiques : L. albiseta Coquillet, L. glabrifronssp.nov., L. kafaristasp.nov., L. nigrimana Coquillet and L. shewellisp.nov. Cellesci sont illustrées et une clé est incluse. Des différences génitaliques constantes entre les spécimens néarctiques et paléarctiques chez l’espèce généralement identifiée comme Lauxania cylindricornis (Fabricius) justifient la reconnaissance des spécimens néarctiques comme espèce distincte (L. shewelli). Chez les mâles, il existe deux types distincts d’organes génitaux : le premier apparemment plésiomorphique où le phallapodème est cylindrique, le phallus, membraneux et les postgonites, pointus et sans ramification. Chez le second type, présumément apomorphique, le phallapodeme est sclérotizé et entoure la base du phallus, le phallus est sclerotizé et convoluté, et les postgonites, ramifiés. Ces deux mêmes types génitaliques se retrouvent aussi chez le genre Calliopum Strand, ce qui indiquerait que Lauxania et Calliopum, tels que présentement définis, peuvent ne pas être monophylétiques.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collin, J.E. 1948. A short synopsis of the British Sapromyzidae (Diptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 99: 225–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1898. New species of Sapromyzidae. The Canadian Entomologist 30: 277–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1902. New acalyptrate Diptera from North America. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 10: 177–91Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R., McAtee, W.L. 1924. Keys to flies of the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, and Sapromyzidae of the Eastern United States, with a list of the species of the District of Columbia region. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 65(12): 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinek, V. 1974. New European species Lauxania minor sp.n., and redescription of species Lauxania cylindricornis (Fabr.) (Diptera: Lauxaniidae). Biologia (Bratislava) 29: 609–17Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology—adults. pp. 963in McAlpine, J.F. et al. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 1. Monograph No. 27, Research Branch, Agriculture CanadaGoogle Scholar
Melander, A.L. 1913. A synopsis of the Sapromyzidae. Psyche (Cambridge) 20: 5782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.M. 1977. Ecology of Lauxaniidae (Diptera: Acalyptratae), I. Old and new rearing records with biological notes and discussion. Annals of the Natal Museum 23: 215–38Google Scholar
Papp, L. 1978. Contribution to the revision of the Palaearctic Lauxaniidae (Diptera). Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 70: 213–31Google Scholar
Papp, L., Shatalkin, A.I. 1998. Family Lauxaniidae. pp. 383400in Papp, L., Darvas, B. (Eds.), Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 3. Higher Brachycera. Budapest: Science HeraldGoogle Scholar
Shatalkin, A.I. 1993. New species of Lauxaniidae (Diptera). Russian Entomological Journal 2: 105–18Google Scholar
Shewell, G.E. 1938. The Lauxaniidae (Diptera) of Southern Quebec and adjacent regions. The Canadian Entomologist 70: 102–18, 133–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewell, G.E. 1987. Lauxaniidae. pp. 951–64 in McAlpine, J.F. et al. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 2. Monograph No. 28, Research Branch, Agriculture CanadaGoogle Scholar
Stuckenberg, B.R. 1971. A review of the Old World genera of Lauxaniidae (Diptera). Annals of the Natal Museum 20: 499610Google Scholar
Wheeler, T.A. 1995. Systematics of the New World Rachispoda Lioy (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae): morphology, key to species groups, and revisions of the atra, fuscipennis, limosa and vespertina species groups. Journal of Natural History 29: 159230CrossRefGoogle Scholar