Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:51:44.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the Genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae) VII. The Subgenus Eurylophella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Richard K. Allen  and
George F. Edmunds Jr.
Richard K. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
George F. Edmunds Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fourteen species of the subgenus Eurylophella are reviewed with accounts of each species including complete synonymies, synoptic descriptions of nymphs and adults, and distribution. Illustrated keys for nymphs and adults and distribution maps are presented for each species. Ephemerella bieoloroides McDunnough is regarded as a synonym of E. verisimilis McDunnough. Ephemerella doris and E. trilineata Berner are of questionable status, being either closely allied to or identical with E. temporalis; and the relationship of E. lithuanica Kazlauskas to E. karelica is uncertain.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 95 , Issue 6 , June 1963 , pp. 597 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1956. A list of the mayflies of Oregon. Proc. Utah Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters 33: 85–87.Google Scholar
Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1959. A revision of the genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). I. The subgenus Timpanoga. Canad. Ent. 91: 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1961. A revision of the genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). II. The subgenus Caudatella. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 54: 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1961. A revision of the genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). III. The subgenus Attenuatella. Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. 34. 161–173.Google Scholar
Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1962. A revision of the genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). IV. The subgenus Dannella. Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. 35: 333–338.Google Scholar
Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1962. A revision of the genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). V. The subgenus Drunella in North America. Misc. Pub., Ent. Soc. Amer. 3: 145–180.Google Scholar
Allen, R. K., and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., In Press. A revision of the genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). VI. The subgenus Serratella in North America. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
Berner, L. 1946. New species of Florida mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Florida Ent. 28: 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, L. 1950. The mayflies of Florida. Univ. Florida Studies, Biol. Sci. Ser. 4: 1–267.Google Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1953. The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., Urbana 26: 1–216.Google Scholar
Clemens, W. A. 1913. New species and new life histories of Ephemeridae or mayflies. Canad. Ent. 45: 246–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, W. A. 1915. Rearing experiments and ecology of Georgian Bay Ephemeridae. Contr. Canad. Biol., Sessional Paper 39b: 113–128.Google Scholar
Day, W. C. 1956. (Ch. 3, pp. 79–105.) In: Usinger, R. L., ed., Aquatic Insects of California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. 508 pp.Google Scholar
Demoulin, G. 1958. Nouveau schema de classification des Archodonates et des Ephéméroptères. Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belg. 34 (No. 27): 1–19.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. E. 1883–1888. A revisional monograph of recent Ephemeridae or mayflies. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. Sec. Ser. Zool. 3: 1–352.Google Scholar
Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1959. Subgeneric groups within the mayfly genus Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 52: 543–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, G. F. Jr., and Traver, J. R.. 1954. An outline of a reclassification of the Ephemeroptera. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 56: 236–240.Google Scholar
Howell, T. 1941. Notes on Ephemeroptera and aquatic Diptera of western North Carolina. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 57: 306–317.Google Scholar
Ide, F. P. 1930. Contribution to the biology of Ontario mayflies with descriptions of new species. Canad. Ent. 62: 204–213, 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, F. P. 1935. The effect of temperature on the distribution of the mayfly fauna of a stream. Univ. Toronto Studies, Biol. Ser. 39, Publ. Ontario Fish. Res. Lab. 50: 9–76.Google Scholar
Kazlauskas, R. 1959. Material about the mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in Lithuanian SSR with description of new species Eurylophella lithuanica Kaslauskas sp. n. and imago of Neoephemera maxima (Joly). Vilniaus Valstybinio V. Kapsuko Universiteto Mokslo Darbai. 12 (Biologija, Geografija ir Geologija, 6): 157–174.Google Scholar
Keffermüller, M. 1960. Investigations on the fauna of Ephemeroptera in Great Poland. Poznan Soc. Friends of Science, Pub. Sect. Biol. 19: 1–57.Google Scholar
Lyman, F. E. 1944. Effect of temperature on emergence of mayfly imagoes from the sub-imago stage. Ent. News 55: 113–115.Google Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1924. New Ephemeridae from New England. Occas. Papers Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 5: 73–76.Google Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1925. The Ephemeroptera of Covey Hill, Que. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada 19: 207–224.Google Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1926. Notes on North American Ephemeroptera with descriptions of new species. Canad. Ent. 58: 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1930. The Ephemeroptera of the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Canad. Ent. 62: 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1931. The bicolor group of the genus Ephemerella with particular reference to the nymphal stages (Ephemeroptera). Canad. Ent. 63: 30–42, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1938. New species of North American Ephemeroptera with critical notes. Canad. Ent. 70: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, V. K. 1952. New western Ephemeroptera III. Pan-Pac. Ent. 28: 93–103.Google Scholar
Neave, F. 1934. A contribution to the aquatic insect fauna of Lake Winnipeg. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. and Hydrograph. 31: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowa, R. 1961. New stand of Ephemerella karelica (Tiensuu) (=Eurylophella karelica Tiensuu). Acta Hydrobiol. 3: 59–62.Google Scholar
Sprules, W. M. 1947. An ecological investigation of stream insects in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Pub. Ont. Fish. Res. Lab. 69, Univ. Toronto Studies, Biol. Ser. 56: 1–81.Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1935. On the Ephemeroptera-fauna of Laatokan Karjala (Karelia Ladogensis). Ann. Ent. Fenn. 1: 3–23.Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1939. A survey of the distribution of mayflies (Ephemerida) in Finland. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 5: 97–124.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1932. Mayflies of North Carolina. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 47: 163–236.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1934. New North American species of mayflies (Ephemerida). Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 50: 189–254.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1935. Part II. Systematic. (pp. 237–739, pls. 34–40, text figs. 77–168). In: Needham, J. G, Traver, J. R., and Hsu, Yin-Chi, The Biology of Mayflies. Ithaca, New York: Comstock Publishing Co. 759 pp.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1937. Notes on mayflies of the Southeastern States (Ephemeroptera). Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 53: 27–86.Google Scholar
Wright, M., and Berner, L.. 1949. Notes on mayflies of Eastern Tennessee. Jour. Tennessee Acad. Sci. 24: 287–298.Google Scholar