Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:39:43.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW OF SPECIES OF TRISETACUS (ACARI: ERIOPHYOIDEA) FROM NORTH AMERICA, WITH COMMENTS ON ALL NOMINATE TAXA IN THE GENUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Ian M. Smith
Ian M. Smith
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mites of the genus Trisetacus from North America are revised, and a key is presented for the 22 species recognized. A diagnosis and a review of host and distributional data are presented for each of these species. A comprehensive review of all nominate species and subspecies is included to facilitate appropriate usage of available names.

Résumé

L'auteur révise les acariens du genre Trisetacus d'Amérique du Nord, et présente une clef d'identification des 22 espèces reconnues. Un diagnostic et une revue de l'information sur les hôtes et la répartition sont présentés pour chaque espèce. L'ouvrage inclue une revue compréhensive de toutes les espèces et les sous-espèces nommées pour faciliter l'usage approprié des noms disponibles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 116 , Issue 9 , September 1984 , pp. 1157 - 1211
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

André, M. 1946. Une nouvelle variété de l'Eriophyes pini (Nal.), parasite des cyprès dans le département du Var. Bull. Mus. Paris, 2e serie 18: 475–477.Google Scholar
Bagnyuk, I. G. and Shevchenko, V. G.. 1982. A new species of mite of the genus Trisetacus Keifer (Acarina, Tetrapodili) on spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst. Ent. Obozr. 61: 189–194.Google Scholar
Baker, E. W. 1948. A new trichadenid mite which further indicates a phylogenetic relationship between the Tetranychidae and Eriophyidae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 50: 59–60.Google Scholar
Baker, E. W. and Wharton, G. W.. 1952. An introduction to Acarology. New York: Macmillan. 465 pp.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, M. 1973. Contributo alla conscenza degli acari eriofidi viventi sul gen. Pinus in Italia. Redia 54: 1–22.Google Scholar
De-Millo, A. P. 1967. O dimorfizme samtsov u chetyrekhnogikh kleshchei (Acarina, Eriophyidae). Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta 3: 26–33.Google Scholar
Farkas, H. 1965. Familie Eriophyidae, Gallmilben. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas, Bd. 3, Liefg. 3. Neubearb. 155 pp.Google Scholar
Garman, H. 1883. The Phytopti and other injurious plant mites. Ill. St. ent. Rep. 12: 123–143.Google Scholar
Hodgkiss, H. E. 1918. Eriophyes ramosus n. sp. J. econ. Ent. 11: 149.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. 1976. Eriophyid mite associated with damaged Yellow Cypress cones. Bi-mon. Res. Notes, Can. For. Serv. 32: 15–16.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. 1981. Trisetacus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) on Pinus contorta in British Columbia: distribution, symptoms, and provenance effect. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 651–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadono, F. 1981. Two new eriophyoid mites from Japan (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Appl. ent. Zool. 16: 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1938. Eriophyid studies. I. Bull. Calif. St. Dep. Agric. 27: 181–195.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1944. Eriophyid studies XIV. Bull Calif. St. Dep. Agric. 33: 18–38.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1946. A review of North American economic eriophyid mites. J. econ. Ent. 39: 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1952 a. Eriophyid studies XVIII. Bull. Calif. St. Dep. Agric. 41: 31–42.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1952 b. The eriophyid mites of California (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Bull. Calif. Insect Surv. 2. 123 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1957. Eriophyid studies XXV. Bull. Calif. St. Dep. Agric. 46: 242–248.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1959. New eriophyid mites. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52: 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1963. Eriophyid studies B-10. Bur. Ent. Calif. Dep. Agric. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1964. Eriophyid studies B-12. Bur. Ent. Calif. Dep. Agric. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1965. Eriophyid studies B-16. Bur. Ent. Calif. Dep. Agric. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1970. Eriophyid studies C-4. Agric. Res. Serv. U.S. Dep. Agric. 24 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1975. Injurious eriophyoid mites. Chap. 13, pp. 397–533, in Jeppson, L. R., Keifer, H. H., and Baker, E. W., Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. 614 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. 1979. Eriophyid studies C-17. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. 24 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H., Baker, E. W., Kono, T., Delfinado, M., and Styer, W. E.. 1982. An illustrated guide to plant abnormalities caused by eriophyoid mites in North America. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handbk 573. 178 pp.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H. and Saunders, J. L.. 1972. Trisetacus campnodus, n. sp. (Acarina: Eriophyidae), attacking Pinus sylvestris. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 46–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, G. W. and Lindquist, E. E.. 1979. Evolution of phytophagous mites (Acari). A. Rev. Ent. 24: 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1976. Transfer of the Tarsocheylidae to the Heterostigmata, and reassignment of the Tarsonemina and Heterostigmata to lower hierarchic status in the Prostigmata (Acari). Can. Ent. 108: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. V. G. and Hedlin, A. F.. 1960. Notes on the Juniper Berry Mite, Trisetacus quadrisetus (Thomas) (Acarina: Eriophyidae), in British Columbia. Can. Ent. 92: 608–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalepa, A. 1887. Die Anatomie der Phytopten. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Math.-naturw. 96: 115–165.Google Scholar
Nalepa, A. 1898. Eriophyidae (Phytoptidae). Das Tierreich, Liefg. 4. 74 pp.Google Scholar
Nalepa, A. 1910. Eriophyiden-Gallmilben. pp. 165–293, in Die Zoococidien Deutschlands und ihre Bewohner. Zoologica 61. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Nalepa, A. 1920. Neue und wenig bekannte Eriophyiden. Verh. zool. bot. Ges. Wien 70: 81–98.Google Scholar
Nalepa, A. 1929. Neuer Katalog der Bisher Beschriebenen Gallmilben, ihrer Gallen und Wirtpflantzen. Marcellia 25: 67–183.Google Scholar
Nuzzaci, G. 1975. Contributi alla conoscenza degli acari eriofidi II. Descrizione delle due nuove specie Trisetacus pinastri e Diptacus hedriphagus. Entomologica 11: 21–27.Google Scholar
Nuzzaci, G. and Monaco, R.. 1977. Danni al cipresso da Trisetacus juniperinus (Nal.). Informatore Fitopatologico 11: 11–14.Google Scholar
Postner, M. 1968. Uber eine in den Nadeln der Weisstanne (Abies alba Mill.) lebende Gallmilbe, Trisetacus abietis n. sp. (Eriophyidae, Acarina). Z. angew. Ent. 62: 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postner, M. 1976. Zur kenntnis der in Europa an Tanne und Fichte auftretenden Gallmilben der Gattungen Trisetacus Keifer, Nalepella Keifer und Kieferella Boczek (Acarina, Eriophyoidea). Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzensch. 83: 131–136.Google Scholar
Roivainen, H. 1951. Contribution to the knowledge of the eriophyids of Finland. Acta ent. fenn. 8: 1–72.Google Scholar
Rose, A. H. 1965. Eriophyid mites on conifers. Can. Dep. For. Bi-mon. Progr. Rep. 21: 1.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, V. G. 1962. Novyi chetyrekhnogii kleshch- Trisetacus kirghisorum n. sp. (Acarina, Eriophyidae)-vreditel semyan archi. Trudy Kirghizskoy Lesnoy Opytnoy Stantsii 3: 299–305.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, V. G. 1970. Proiskhozhdeniei morfo-funktsional'naya otsenka chetyrekhnogikh kleshchei (Acarina, Eriophyoidea). V. Kn. pp. 153–183in Issledovaniya po evolutsionnoi morfologii bespozvonochnykh. Leningrad: Leningrad Univ.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, V. G. 1976. Problemy filogenii i klassifikatsii chetyrekhnogikh kleshchei (Acarina, Tetrapodili). Doklady na dvadstat' vos'mom ezhegodnom chtenii pamyati N. A. kholodkovskogo. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vseesoyuznoe Entomol. Ovo., pp. 3–52. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, V. G. and Silvere, A. P.. 1968. Rotovoi apparat chetyrekhnogikh kleshchei (Acarina, Eriophyoidea). Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. liom. Biol. 17: 248–263.Google Scholar
Silvere, A. P. and Shtein-Margolina, V.. 1976. Tetrapodili-Chetyrekhnogie Kleshchi. Talliu, Estonia: Inst. Exp. Biol. Akad. Nauk. 165 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, I. M. 1977. Two new species of Trisetacus (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) associated with Cupressaceae. Can. Ent. 109: 843–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. M. 1978 a. Two new species of Trisetacus (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) from berries of junipers in North America. Can. Ent. 110: 1157–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. M. 1978 b. Unusual new species of Trisetacus (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) associated with Cupressaceae in North America. Can. Ent. 110: 1161–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. M. 1979. Descriptions of new species of Trisetacus (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) from Pinaceae in eastern North America. Can. Ent. 111: 425–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. M. 1984. Descriptions of new species of Trisetacus (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) from Pinaceae in western North America. Can. Ent. 116: 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styer, W. E., Nielsen, D. G., and Balderston, C. P.. 1972. A new species of Trisetacus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea: Nalepellidae) from Scotch Pine. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 1089–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F. 1889. Phytoptus quadrisetus in Massalongo. N. Giorn. bot. Ital. 22.Google Scholar
Trotter, A. 1902. Cecidotheca italica 7.Google Scholar
Tubeuf, C. V. 1897. Phytoptus laricis n. sp. ein neuer Parasit der Larche, Larix europaea. Forstl.-naturw. Zschr. 6: 120.Google Scholar
Tubeuf, C. V. 1910. Knospen-Hexenleben und Zweig-Tuberkulose der Zirbelkiefer. I. Teil. Naturw. Zschr. Forst.-u. Landw. 8: 1–12.Google Scholar
Vasil'eva, E. A., Mitrofanov, V. I., Sekerskaya, N. P., and Sharonov, A. A.. 1982. Chetyrekhnogie kleshchi khovoinykh porod Kryma. pp. 7–21 in Livshits, I. Z., (Red.) Vrediteli i bolezni plodovykh i dekoratinykh Kultur Kryma. State Nikita Biological Gardens, Yalta. 122 pp.Google Scholar
Walther, E. 1925. The Pine Needle Mite, a new enemy of pines, Eriophyes pini Nalepa, family Eriophyidae. J. econ. Ent. 18: 830–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, E. 1928. Some additional notes on the Pine Needle Mite, Eriophyes pini Nalepa. J. econ. ent. 21: 628–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar