Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:02:29.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW OF PARASITIC ASSOCIATIONS OF LARVAL WATER MITES (ACARI: PARASITENGONA: HYDRACHNIDA) WITH INSECT HOSTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Ian M. Smith  and
D.R. Oliver
Ian M. Smith
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
D.R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historical and recently published information on the parasitic associations of larval water mites with insect hosts is critically reviewed and summarized. A number of problematical published host records are either confirmed or rejected, and many newly discovered associations are reported. Associations of parasitic larvae with insect hosts are confirmed for species of water mites representing 70 of the nearly 300 described genera, in 28 of the 45 currently recognized families, and all 7 superfamilies. Life history, behavioral, ecological, and phylogenetic data on water mites of genera with known larvae are summarized to provide the basis for interpreting the evolutionary significance of observed host associations. Previously established hypotheses are evaluated in the light of a greatly expanded list of verified observations.

Résumé

L’ouvrage présente une revue critique et un sommaire de l’information historique et nouvelle sur les associations des larves d’acariens aquatiques avec leurs hôtes insectes. Les auteurs confirment ou rejetent plusieurs mentions douteuses qui se trouvent dans la littérature publiée, et rapportent beaucoup d’associations découvertes à nouveau. Nous confirmons les associations parasites des larves d’acariens aquatiques représentant 70 des presque 300 genres décrits, dans 28 des 45 familles reconnues, et tous les 7 superfamilles. Nous présentons un résumé de l’information sur le développement postembryonnaire, le comportement, l’écologie, et la phylogénie d’acariens aquatiques pour proviser la base d’une discussion de la signification évolutionnaire des associations parasites des larves connues. Les hypothèses phylogénétiques sont réévaluées à la lumière d’une liste beaucoup plus complète d’observations vérifiées.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 118 , Issue 5 , May 1986 , pp. 407 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abro, A. 1979. Attachment and feeding devices of water-mite larvae (Arrenurus spp.) parasitic on damselflies (Odonata, Zygoptera). Zool. Scripta 8: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abro, A. 1982. The effects of parasitic water mite larvae (Arrenurus spp.) on zygopteran imagoes (Odonata). J. Invert. Path. 39: 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, W., and Viets, K.. 1938. Die biologischen (parasitologischen) Beziehungen zwischen Arachnoideen und Spongien. Z. ParasitKde. 10: 67–93.Google Scholar
Arnett, R.H. 1968. The beetles of the United States (A manual for identification). American Entomological Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1112 pp.Google Scholar
Ashe, P. 1983. A catalogue of chironomid genera and subgenera of the world including synonyms (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. scand./Suppl. 17: 1–68.Google Scholar
Baer, C.E. von. 1827. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der niedern Thiere. II. 4. Hydrachna concharum. Nova Acta Acad. Caesar. Leop. Carol. 13: 523, 590–594, 881.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F. 1924. On the occurrence of mites on crane-flies. Ent. mon. Mag. 40: 135–137.Google Scholar
Barr, D.W. 1968. Limnesia (Limnesiella) marshallae, description of larva. Pilot Register of Zoology (Cornell Univ., NY). Card No. 26.Google Scholar
Barr, D.W. 1972. The ejaculatory complex in water mites (Acari: Parasitengona): Morphology and potential value for systematics. Life Sci. Contr., R. Ont. Mus. 81. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Beneden, P.J. 1848. Recherches sur l'histoire naturelle et le développement de l'Atax ypsilophora (Hydrachna concharum), acaride vivant en parasite sur les Anodontes. Mém. Acad. r. Sci. Lett. Belg. 24: 1–24.Google Scholar
Berg, K. 1937. Contributions to the biology of Corethra Meigen (Chaoborus Lichtenstein). Dansk Vidensk. Selsk. biol. Medd. 13. 101 pp.Google Scholar
Besseling, A.J. 1939. De levenswijze van Sperchon setiger S. Thor. Ent. Ber., Amst. 10: 143–144.Google Scholar
Besseling, A.J. 1964. Die Nederlandse Watermijten (Hydrachnellae: Latreille 1802). Monog. Ned. Ent. Ver. 1. 199 pp.Google Scholar
Biesiadka, E., and Cichocka, M.. 1984. Studies on the morphology of larval stages of water mites (Hydracarina). 1. Descriptions of three species of the genera Protzia Piersig and Sperchon Kramer. Annls zool., Warsz. 38: 159–171.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. 1905. Les moustiques: Histoire naturelle et médicale. Reduval, Paris. 673 pp.Google Scholar
Booth, J.P., and Learner, M.A.. 1978. The parasitization of chironomid midges (Diptera) by water mite larvae (Hydracarina: Acari) in an eutrophic reservoir in South Wales. Arch. Hydrobiol. 84: 1–28.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1962. Zur Biologie und Ethologie der einheimischen Wassermilben Arrenurus (Megaluracarus) globator (Müll.) 1776, Piona nodata nodata (Müll.) 1776 und Eylais infundibulifera meridionalis (Thon) 1899 (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 89: 501–584.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1965 a. Zur Ökologie und Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Arrenurus valdiviensis K.O. Viets 1964 (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 55: 115–141.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1965 b. Das parasitäre Larvenstadium von Arrenurus (A.) valdiviensis K.O. Viets 1964 (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 55: 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böttger, K. 1970 a. Die Ernährungsweise der Wassermilbe Limnochares aquatica (L.) (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Zool. Anz./Suppl. 33: 85–91.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1970 b. Die Ernährungsweise der Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 55: 895–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böttger, K. 1972 a. Vergleichend biologisch-ökologische Studien zum Entwicklungszyklus der Süsswassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari). I. Der Entwicklungszyklus von Hydrachna globosa und Limnochares aquatica. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 57: 109–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böttger, K. 1972 b. Vergleichend biologisch-ökologische Studien zum Entwicklungszyklus der Süsswassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari). II. Der Entwicklungszyklus von Limnesia maculata und Unionicola crassipes. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 57: 263–319.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1972 c. Parasitologische Beziehungen zwischen Wassermilben und Trichopteren. Zool. Anz. 188: 154–156.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1976. Types of parasitism by larvae of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnellae). Freshwat. Biol. 6: 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böttger, K. 1977. The general life cycle of fresh water mites (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Acarologia 18: 495–502.Google Scholar
Böttger, K. 1981. Zur Parasitologie und postparasitischen Entwicklung der neotropischen Wassermilbe Arrenurus valencius (Hydrachnellae, Acari) nebst einigen faunistischen Angaben zum See “Laguna Chichoj” in Guatemala. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 15: 155–166.Google Scholar
Böttger, K., and Schaller, F.. 1961. Biologische und ethologische Beobachtungen an einheimischen Wassermilben. Zool. Anz. 166: 46–50.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E. 1929. Fréquence du parasitisme d'Hydrachna processifera sur le Dytiscus marginalis en Normandie. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 7: 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruyant, L.A. 1908. Sur les larves d'Hydrachnides parasites des Culicides. C.r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 65: 706–707.Google Scholar
Campion, F.W., and Campion, H.. 1909. Notes on dragonfly parasites (larval water-mites). Entomologist 42: 242–246.Google Scholar
Cassagne-Méjean, F. 1966. Contribution à l'étude des Arrenuridae de France. Acarologia 8/Fasc. Suppl. pp. 1–186.Google Scholar
Claparéde, E. 1869. Studien an Acariden. Z. wiss. Zool. 18: 445–546.Google Scholar
Conroy, J.C. 1979. The taxonomy and ecology of Pionopsis marionensis sp. nov. (Acari: Pionidae), a water mite from Marion Lake, British Columbia. Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Acarol. 1974: 127–134.Google Scholar
Conroy, J.C., and Kuhn, J.L.. 1977. New annotated records of Odonata from the province of Manitoba with notes on their parasitism by larvae of water mites. Manitoba Ent. 11: 27–40.Google Scholar
Cook, D.R. 1955 a. Two new genera of Hydracarina from a spring in northern Michigan. Am. Midl. Nat. 53: 412–418.Google Scholar
Cook, D.R. 1955 b. Preliminary studies on the Hydracarina of Michigan: The subfamily Foreliinae Viets (Acarina: Pionidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 48: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, D.R. 1959. Studies on the Thyasinae of North America (Acarina: Hydryphantidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 62: 402–428.Google Scholar
Cook, D.R. 1974. Water mite genera and subgenera. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 21. 860 pp.Google Scholar
Cook, D.R. 1976. North American species of the genus Mideopsis (Acarina: Mideopsidae). Contr. Am. ent. Inst. 11: 101–148.Google Scholar
Corbet, P.S. 1963. Reliability of parasitic water-mites (Hydracarina) as indicators of physiological age in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Ent. Exp. Appl. 6: 215–233.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.T. 1959. Hydracarines and nematodes parasitizing Corixa scotti (D. and S.) (Hemiptera) in western Ireland. Ir. Nat. J. 13: 88–92.Google Scholar
Crowell, R.M. 1953. Morphology and developmental stages of Piona linguaplax n. sp. (Hydracarina: Pionidae) a water mite from North Carolina. Am. Midl. Nat. 50: 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, R.M. 1960. The taxonomy, distribution and developmental stages of Ohio water mites. Bull. Ohio biol. Surv. 1. 77 pp.Google Scholar
Crowell, R.M. 1963. The developmental stages of a water mite, Limnochares americana, parasitic on damsel flies (Coenagrionidae). pp. 131–134 in Advances in acarology, 1. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Crowell, R.M. 1967. The immature stages of Albia caerulea (Acarina: Axonopsidae), a water mite parasitizing caddisflies (Trichoptera). Can. Ent. 99: 730–734.Google Scholar
Crowell, R.M. 1970. The parasitism of mosquitoes by Hydracarina, or water mites. Proc. New Jers. Mosq. Exterm. Assoc. 57: 173–177.Google Scholar
Davids, C. 1969. Enige aspecten van de biologie van twee verwante watermijtsoorten, Hydrachna conjecta Koen. en H. cruenta Müll. Levende Nat. 72: 197–201.Google Scholar
Davids, C. 1973. The water mite Hydrachna conjecta Koenike, 1895 (Acari, Hydrachnellae), bionomics and relation to species of Corixidae (Hemiptera). Neth. J. Zool. 23: 363–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, C. 1977. De relaties tussen watermijten en insekten. Vakbl. Biol. 13: 225–228.Google Scholar
Davids, C., and Belier, R.. 1979. Spermatophores and sperm transfer in the water mite Hydrachna conjecta Koen. Reflections of the descent of water mites from terrestrial forms. Acarologia 21: 84–90.Google Scholar
Davids, C., Nielsen, G.J., and Gehring, P.. 1977. Site selection and growth of the larvae of Eylais discreta Koenike, 1897 (Acari, Hydrachnellae). Bijdr. Dierk. 46: 180–184.Google Scholar
Davids, C., and Shoots, C.J.. 1975. The influence of the water mite species Hydrachna conjecta and H. cruenta (Acari, Hydrachnellae) on the egg production of the Corixidae Sigara striata and Cymatia coleoptrata (Hemiptera). Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 19: 3079–3082.Google Scholar
Davies, D.M. 1959. The parasitism of black flies (Diptera, Simuliidae) by larval water mites mainly of the genus Sperchon. Can. J. Zool. 37: 353–369.Google Scholar
Decksback, M. 1928. Zur Erforschung de Chironomidenlarven einiger russischer Gewässer. Zool. Anz. 79: 91–104.Google Scholar
Dugès, A.D. 1834. Deuxième mémoire sur l'ordre des Acariens. Recherches sur l'ordre des Acariens. Remarques sur la famille des Hydracnés. Annls Sci. nat. 1 (Zool.): 144–174.Google Scholar
Dyé, L. 1905. Les parasites des culicides. Arch. Parasitol. 9: 5–77.Google Scholar
Easwari Amma, K.G. 1967. Anatomy and embryology of Eylais extendens (Müll.) (Family Eylaidae: Hydracarina). Bull. Dept. mar. biol. Oceanogr. Univ. Kerala. 3: 75–130.Google Scholar
Efford, I.E. 1962. The taxonomy, distribution and habitat of the watermite, Feltria romijni Besseling 1930. Hydrobiologia 19: 161–178.Google Scholar
Efford, I.E. 1963. The parasitic ecology of some water mites. J. Anim. Ecol. 32: 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efford, I.E. 1965. Ecology of the water mite Feltria romijni Besseling. J. Anim. Ecol. 34: 233–251.Google Scholar
Efford, I.E. 1966 a. Observations on the life-history of three stream-dwelling water mites. Acarologia 8: 86–93.Google Scholar
Efford, I.E. 1966 b. The larva of Feltria romijni. Acarologia 8: 456–459.Google Scholar
Ellis-Adam, A.C., and Davids, C.. 1970. Oviposition and post-embryonic development of the water mite Piona alpicola (Neuman, 1880). Neth. J. Zool. 20: 122–137.Google Scholar
Fenley, W.R. 1966. Field observations of Aedes ventrevittis Dyar (Diptera: Culicidae) parasitized by Panisopsis sp. (Acarina: Thyasidae). Mosquito News 26: 583–584.Google Scholar
Fernando, C.H., and Galbraith, D.. 1970. A heavy infestation of gerrids (Hemiptera- Heteroptera) by water mites (Acarina- Limnocharidae). Can. J. Zool. 48: 592–594.Google Scholar
Fischer, F.C.J. 1960–1973. Trichopterorum catalogus, Vol. 1–15. Nederlandse Entomologische Vereeniging, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Flechtmann, C.H.W. 1974. Caso de um mosquito intensamente parasitado por larvas de acaros acquaticos. Anais E.S.A. “Luiz de Queiroz” 31: 361–366.Google Scholar
Frison, T.H. 1929. Fall and winter stoneflies, or Plecoptera, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. nat. Hist. Surv. 18: 343–409.Google Scholar
Gledhill, T., Cowley, J., and Gunn, R.J.M.. 1982. Some aspects of the host:parasite relationships between adult blackflies (Diptera; Simuliidae) and larvae of the water-mite Sperchon setiger (Acari; Hydrachnellae) in a small chalk stream in southern England. Freshwat. Biol. 12: 345–357.Google Scholar
Gordon, M.J., Swann, B.K., and Paterson, C.G.. 1979. The biology of Unionicola formosa (Dana and Whelpley): a water mite parasite in the unionid bivalve, Anodonta cataracta (Say), in a New Brunswick lake. Can. J. Zool. 57: 1748–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogan, W.L., and Navai, S.. 1975. New records of mites associated with ceratopogonids (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 77: 214–215.Google Scholar
Harris, D.A., and Harrison, A.D.. 1974. Life cycles and larval behaviour of two species of Hydrachna (Acari: Hydrachnidae) parasitic upon Corixidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Can. J. Zool. 52: 1155–1165.Google Scholar
Hevers, J. 1978 a. Zur Sexualbiologie der Gattung Unionicola (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 105: 33–64.Google Scholar
Hevers, J. 1978 b. Interspezifische Beziehungen zwischen Unionicola – Larven (Hydrachnellae, Acari) und Chironomidae (Diptera, Insecta). Verh. ges. Ökol. 7: 211–217.Google Scholar
Hevers, J. 1980 a. Biologisch-ökologische Untersuchungen zum Entwicklungzyklus der in Deutschland auftretenden Unionicola-Arten (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 57: 324–373.Google Scholar
Hevers, J. 1980 b. Morphologie und Systematik der Larven der Unionicola-Arten (Hydrachnellae, Acari) Deutschlands. Acarologia 21: 249–266.Google Scholar
Hubault, E. 1927. Contribution à l'étude des invertébrés torrenticoles. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg./Suppl. 9. 388 pp.Google Scholar
Hungerford, H.B. 1959. Hemiptera. Chapter 36. pp. 958–972in Edmondson, W.T. (Ed.), Fresh-water Biology, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Illies, J. 1966. Katalog der rezenten Plecoptera. Tierreich 82: 1–632.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1950 a. On the life-history of a water-mite, Hygrobates longipalpis (Herm.). Gakugei 2: 74–78.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1950 b. Studies on the life history of the water mite, Arrenurus (Arrenurus) daisetsuensis Imamura, from Mt. Daisetsu. Trans. Sapporo nat. Hist. Soc. 19: 1–6.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1950 c. On the life-history of Partnunia uchidai, a water mite parasitic on stone-flies. Annotnes zool. jap. 24: 54–58.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1951 a. A new water mite, Arrenurus daisetsuensis n. sp., with a note on its life history. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. (Ser. VI, Zoology) 10: 106–112.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1951 b. Studies of three water-mites from Hokkaido parasitic on midges. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. (Ser. VI, Zoology) 10: 274–288.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1952. On the life history of a water mite, Neumania uchidae, parasitic on midges. Jap. J. sanit. Zool. 3: 46–47.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1954. Studies on water-mites from Hokkaido. J. Hokkaido Gakugei Univ., B. Suppl. 1: 1–148.Google Scholar
Imamura, T., and Mitchell, R.D.. 1967 a. The water mites parasitic on the damselfly, Cercion hieroglyphicum Brauer. I. Systematics and life history. Annotnes zool. jap. 40: 28–36.Google Scholar
Imamura, T. 1967 b. The ecology and life cycle of the water mite, Piersigia limnophila Protz. Annotnes zool. jap. 40: 37–44.Google Scholar
Itskal, A.M. 1928. K biologii roda Arrhenurus Dug. (Hydracarina). Trudy leningr. Obshch. Estest. 58: 3–23.Google Scholar
Jalil, M., and Mitchell, R.. 1972. Parasitism of mosquitoes by water mites. J. med. Ent. 9: 305–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W.E. 1964. Parasitic Hydracarina observed on mosquitoes of the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. Mosquito News 24: 336–338.Google Scholar
Jones, R.K.H. 1965. Parasitism of larvae of Unionicola intermedia Koenike and another Unionicola sp. (Acarina, Pionae) on chironomids. Nature 207: 317–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R.K.H. 1967. Descriptions of the larvae of Aturus scaber Kramer, Protzia eximia Protz and Piona uncata Koenike with notes on the life-histories of the latter two (Hydracarina). Annls Limnol. 3: 231–247.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1908. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Hydrachniden. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen. 19: 217–266.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1909. Acarina, Milben. pp. 13–184in Brauer, A. (Ed.), Die Süsswasserfauna Deutschlands, 12. Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1910. Ein Acarinen-insbesondere Hydracarinen-System nebst hydracarinologischen Berichtigungen. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen. 20: 121–164.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1914. Neue und neubenannte Wassermilben. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen. 22: 383–404.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1915. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Wassermilbe Unionicola aculeata (Koen.). Arch. Hydrobiol. 10: 308–320.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1918–1919. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Wassermilbengattung Lebertia Neum. Arch. Hydrobiol. 12: 373–421, 562–692.Google Scholar
Koenike, F. 1920. Eine Wassermilbe als Gast bei einem Wasserkäfer, Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen. 24: 521–524.Google Scholar
Kouwets, F.A.C., and Davids, C.. 1984. The occurrence of chironomid imagines in an area near Utrecht (the Netherlands), and their relations to water mite larvae. Arch. Hydrobiol. 99: 296–317.Google Scholar
Kramer, P.M. 1893. Über die verschiedenen Typen der sechsfüssigen Larven bei den Süsswassermilben. Arch. Naturgesch. 59: 1–24.Google Scholar
Krendowskij, M.E. 1878. O yavleniyakh” prevrashcheniya u vodyanykh” akarid”. Trudy Obshch. Ispyt. Prir. imp. Khar'kov. Univ. 12: 221–286.Google Scholar
Krendowskij, M.E. 1880. O parazitisme akarid na nasekomykh. Trudy Obshch. Ispyt. Prir. imp. Khar'kov. Univ. 13: 169–212.Google Scholar
Krendowskij, M.E. 1885. Presnovodnye akaridy yuzhnoi Possii. Trudy Obshch. Ispyt. Prir. imp. Khar'kov. Univ. 18: 209–258.Google Scholar
Kühlhorn, F. 1962. Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Vermilbung bei Anopheles. Proc. XI. Int. Congr. Ent., 1960. 2: 870–874.Google Scholar
Laird, M. 1947. Some natural enemies of mosquitoes in the vicinity of Palmalmal, New Britain. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 76: 453–476.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1969. Three species of Eylais (Acari: Eylaidae) parasitic on aquatic Hemiptera. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 88: 356–365.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1970 a. Resource partitioning in species of the water mite genus Eylais. Ecology 51: 338–342.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1970 b. New species of Eylais (Acari: Eylaidae) parasitic on aquatic Coleoptera. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 89: 169–188.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1971. Host exploitation and synchronous development in a water mite parasite of the marsh treader Hydrometra myrae (Hemiptera: Hydrometridae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 1254–1259.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1972. Mating behaviour of water mites of the genus Eylais. Acarologia 14: 631–637.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1978. Parasitism of Ceratopogonidae (Diptera) by the water mite Tyrrellia circularis. Mosquito News 38: 282–284.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1979 a. Detachment of parasitic water mites from the mosquito Anopheles crucians (Diptera: Culicidae). J. med. Ent. 15: 99–102.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1979 b. Water mite-induced mortality in a natural population of the mosquito Anopheles crucians (Diptera: Culicidae). J. med. Ent. 15: 529–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1979 c. The food of nymphal and adult water mites of the species Hydryphantes tenuabilis. Acarologia 20: 563–565.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1979 d. A new species of water mite parasitizing the backswimmer Buenoa scimitra. Florida Ent. 62: 304–308.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1980. Parasitism of the backswimmer Buenoa scimitra (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) by the water mite Hydrachna virella (Acari: Hydrachnellae). Freshwat. Biol. 10: 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. 1983. Overview of the effects of water mite parasitism on aquatic insects. pp. 86–90 in Hoy, M.A., Cummingham, G.L., and Knutson, L. (Eds.), Biological Control of Pests by Mites. Spec. Publs Univ. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn 3304.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A., and Boyett, J.M.. 1980. Demonstrating parasitic water mite-induced mortality in natural host populations. Parasitology 81: 465–475.Google Scholar
Lanciani, C.A., and Boyt, A.D.. 1977. The effect of a parasitic water mite, Arrenurus pseudotenuicollis (Acari: Hydrachnellae), on the survival and reproduction of the mosquito Anopheles crucians (Diptera: Culicidae). J. med. Ent. 14: 10–15.Google Scholar
Léger, L., and Motas, C.. 1928. Biologie d'un chironomide. Le Cricotopus biformis Edw. et son intérêt en Salmoniculture. Trav. Lab. Hydrobiol. Piscic. Univ. Grenoble. 20: 25–42.Google Scholar
Leprince, D.J. 1981. Inventaire préliminaire d'acariens (Acari: Hydryphantidae et Arrenuridae) ectoparasites de moustiques (Diptera: Culicidae) du lac Boivin, Granby, Québec. Can. J. Zool. 59: 8–10.Google Scholar
LeSage, L., and Harrison, A.D.. 1980. The biology of Cricotopus (Chironomidae: Orthocladiinae) in an algal-enriched stream: Part II. Effects of parasitism. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 58: 1–25.Google Scholar
Linham, J.H. 1962. Hydracarinid mites parasitic on the mosquito, Culex tarsalis Coquillett (Acarina and Diptera: Culicidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 64: 234.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1913. Zur Kenntnis der Larve von Thyas dentata Thor. Ent. Tidskr. 34: 46–50.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1924. Ein unerwartetes, interessantes Verhältnis in der Epimorphose einer schwedischen Hexalebertia. Ent. Tidskr. 45: 72–79.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1927. Die Hydracarinen Schwedens. I. Beitrag zur Systematik, Embryologie, Ökologie und Verbreitungsgeschichte der schweidischen Arten. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 11: 181–540.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1929 a. Einiges über die Kopulation bei Aturus scaber und Midea orbiculata. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere. 15: 474–480.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1929 b. Über den Begattungsvorgang bei einigen Arrhenurus-Arten. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 15: 705–722.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1930 a. Hydracarina. Zoology of the Faroes, Copenhagen. 48: 1–65.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1930 b. Die Hydracarinen der Insel Bornholm. Dansk Vidensk. Selsk. biol. Meddel. 8: 1–96.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1942. Die Arthropodenfauna von Madeira nach den Ergebnissen der Reise von Prof. Dr. O. Lundblad Juli–August 1935. XXXI. Hydrachnellae. Ark. Zool. 34A: 5: 1–122.Google Scholar
MacGillavry, D. 1913. Eenige insecten bezet met Acari. Tijschr. Ent. 56: LIX–LXI.Google Scholar
Maglio, C. 1924. Idracarini. pp. 75–124 in Monti, R. (Ed.), La limnologia del Lario. Ministero Economia nazionale, Roma. 507 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, J.F. 1938. The British mosquitoes. British Museum (Natural History), London. 341 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, R. 1946. Preliminary list of the Hydracarina of Wisconsin. Revision of part I. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 36: 349–373.Google Scholar
Martin, N.A. 1975. Observations on the relationship between Eylais and Hydrachna (Acari, Hydracarina) and Sigara spp. (Insecta: Hemiptera: Corixidae). N.Z. J. Zool. 2: 45–50.Google Scholar
Masuda, Y. 1934. Notes on the life-history of Hydrachna (Schizohydrachna) nova Marshall. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. B. Zoology 3: 33–43.Google Scholar
Masuda, Y. 1935. On the life history of a water-mite belonging to Eylais living in fresh-water. Botany Zool., Tokyo 3: 1460–1470.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. (Eds.). 1981. Manual of nearctic Diptera, vol. 1. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa. Monograph 27. 674 pp.Google Scholar
McCrae, A.W.R. 1976. The association between larval parasitic water mites (Hydracarina) and Anopheles implexus (Theobald) (Diptera, Culicidae). Bull. ent. Res. 66: 633–650.Google Scholar
Mira, G. 1940. Sulla presenza di forme larvali di un acaro acquatico parassita della famiglia degli Hydracnidae, su alcune zanzare del genre Anopheles in A.O.I. Boll. Idrobiol. Cacc. Pesca Afr. orient. ital. 1: 29–33.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1953. A new species of Lundbladia and remarks on the family Hydryphantidae (water mites). Am. Midl. Nat. 49: 159–170.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1954. A description of the water-mite, Hydrovolzia gerhardi new species, with observations on the life history and ecology. Chicago Acad. Sci. nat. Hist. Misc. 34. 9 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1955 a. Anatomy, life history, and evolution of the mites parasitizing fresh-water mussels. Misc. Publs Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 89: 1–41.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1955 b. Two water-mites from Illinois. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 74: 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1957 a. The mating behaviour of pionid water mites. Am. Midl. Nat. 58: 360–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1957 b. Major evolutionary lines in water mites. Syst. Zool. 6: 137–148.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1958. Sperm transfer in the water-mite Hydryphantes ruber Geer. Am. Midl. Nat. 60: 156–158.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1959. Life histories and larval behavior of arrenurid water-mites parasitizing Odonata. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 67: 1–12.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1961. Behaviour of the larvae of Arrenurus fissicornis Marshall, a water mite parasitic on dragonflies. Anim. Behav. 9: 220–224.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1964. A study of sympatry in the water mite genus Arrenurus (Family Arrenuridae). Ecology 45: 546–558.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1967. Host exploitation of two closely related water mites. Evolution, Lancaster, Pa. 21: 59–75.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.D. 1968. Site selection by larval water mites parasitic on the damselfly Cercion hieroglyphicum Brauer. Ecology 49: 40–47.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, I. 1936 a. Über die Schädigung der Anopheles – mücken durch eine Wassermilbenart. Fukuoka Acta med. 29: 1–11.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, I. 1936 b. Über das Saugorgan von zwei Arten Wassermilbenlarven. Annotnes zool. jap. 15: 306–308.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, I. 1951. On a new anopheline mosquito Anopheles yatsuchiroensis n. sp. found in Kyushu, with some remarks on two related species of the genus. Kyushu Mem. med. Sci. 2: 195–206.Google Scholar
Mohan, M., and Rao, T.K. Raghunatha. 1984. Observations on the infestation of aquatic insects by the red water mites (Acarina: Hydrachnidae). Entomon 9: 61–62.Google Scholar
Motas, C. 1928. Contribution à la connaissance des Hydracariens français particulièrement du Sud-Est de la France. Trav. Lab. Hydrobiol. Piscic. Univ. Grenoble 20. 373 pp.Google Scholar
Motas, C. 1929. Sur le développement postembryonaire de Calonyx brevipalpis (Maglio) et sur les affinités des Protziidae. Annls sci. Univ. Jassy 16: 250–262.Google Scholar
Mullen, G.R. 1974. Acarine parasites of mosquitoes II. Illustrated larval key to the families and genera of mites reportedly parasitic on mosquitoes. Mosquito News 34: 183–195.Google Scholar
Mullen, G.R. 1975. Acarine parasites of mosquitoes I. A critical review of all known records of mosquitoes parasitized by mites. J. med. Ent. 12: 27–36.Google Scholar
Mullen, G.R. 1976. Water mites of the subgenus Truncaturus (Arrenuridae, Arrenurus) in North America. Search, Ithaca. Agric. Ent. 6: 1–35.Google Scholar
Mullen, G.R. 1977. Acarine parasites of mosquitoes. IV. Taxonomy, life history and behaviour of Thyas barbigera and Thyasides sphagnorum (Hydrachnellae: Thyasidae). J. med. Ent. 13: 475–485.Google Scholar
Mullen, G.R. 1979. Aquatic mites parasitic on stoneflies in North America. pp. 481–484 in Recent Advances in Acarology, Vol. II. Academic Press, New York. 569 pp.Google Scholar
Mullen, G.R., and Vercammen-Grandjean, P.H.. 1980. The larval stage of Stygothrombiinae Thor, 1935 and Wandesiinae Schworbel, 1961 and erection of a new superfamily, Stygothrombioidea. Int. J. Acarol. 6: 25–28.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1935 a. Über die bisher bei einigen Nematocerenfamilien (Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae) beobachteten ektoparasitären Hydracarinenlarven. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 29: 720–749.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1935 b. Zur Kenntnis der Odonatenparasiten, mit ganz besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ökologie der in Europa an Libellen schmarotzenden Wassermilbenlarven. Arch. Hydrobiol. 29: 1–122.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1936 a. Zur Morphologie der Arrhenurus-und Georgella-Larven und-Nymphen, mit besonderer Beruck-sichtigung der Libellenparasiten. Arch. Naturgesch. 5: 93–115.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1936 b. Zur Kenntnis des Larvenparasitismus der Thyasinae (Hydracarina), zugleich ein Beitrag über Schmarotzer der Limnobiinae (Diptera). Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 33: 313–326.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1936 c. Über Libellenschmarotzer. Aus Heimat, Stuttgart. 49: 179–182.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1936 d. Über die an den Culicinae (Diptera) schmarotzenden Arrhenurus-Larven (Hydracarina) I. Arch. Hydrobiol. 30: 557–573.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1937 a. Arrenurus planus Marsh. in USA. und A. papillator (O.F. Müll.) in der alten Welt, zwei ökologisch und morphologisch einander entsprechende Arten (Ordnung: Hydracarina). Arch. Hydrobiol. 31: 209–228.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1937 b. Über die an den Culicinae (Diptera) schmarotzenden Arrenurus-Larven (Hydracarina) II. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 34: 353–372.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1937 c. Über den Parasitismus der Wassermilbenlarven an Luftinsekten. Dt. ent. Z. 1937: 19–34.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1938 a. Dritter Beitrag über die an Stechmücken schmarotzenden Arrenurus-Larven (Ordn.: Hydracarina). Arch. Hydrobiol. 33: 99–116.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1938 b. Über den Larvenparasitismus der Arrenurus-Arten (Ordnung: Hydracarina). Abh. Ber. naturw. Abt. Grenzmärk. Ges. Erforsch. Pflege Heimat, Schneidemühl 12: 49–53.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1951. Ein zweiter Beitrag über die in den USA. eine odonaten-parasitische Larvenphase aufweisenden Arrenurus-Arten (Ordnung: Hydracarina). Arch. Hydrobiol. 45: 378–388.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1952. Über Fortpflanzung, Lebensweise und Körperbau von Arrenurus planus Marsh., zugleich ein weiterer Beitrag zur Ökologie und Morphologie der im arctogäischen Raum eine libellenparasitische Larvenphase aufweisenden Arrenuri (Ordnung: Hydracarina). Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 81: 27–46.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1953. Vierter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der im nordamerikanischen Raume an Odonaten parasitierenden Arrenurus-Arten. (Ordnung: Hydracarina). Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 82: 47–57.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1954 a. Kurze Mitteilung über die an Steinfliegen (Plecoptera) schmarotzenden Wassermilben-Larven. Arch. Hydrobiol. 49: 414–420.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1954 b. Zur Kenntnis der an Culiciden (Diptera) schmarotzenden Arrenurus-Larven (Hydracarina), sowie über die Bedeutung dieser Parasiten für Wirt und Mensch. Z. ParasitKde. 16: 298–312.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1956 a. Über die an Limoniidae und Tipulidae parasitierenden Milbenlarven. Z. ParasitKde. 17: 330–338.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1956 b. Hydracarinen-Larven als Ektoparasiten von Kriebelmücken (Ordnung: Simuliidae). Zool. Anz. 156: 314–318.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1958 a. Erster Beitrag über die an afrikanischen Odonaten parasitierenden Arrenurus-Larven (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Z. ParasitKde. 18: 243–256.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1958 b. Eine unbekannte Megaluracarus-Art (Hydrachnellae, Acari) aus Belgisch Kongo mit libellen-parasitischer Larvenphase. Zool. Anz. 160: 47–54.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1958 c. Zur Infektion, Wirtswahl, Zoogeographie und angewandten Bedeutung des Parasitismus der Wassermilbenlarven (Hydrachnellae, Acari) an Luftinsekten. Zool. Anz. 161: 114–125.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1959. Dritter Beitrag über die an afrikanischen Libellen schmarotzenden Arrenurus-Larven (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Arch. Hydrobiol. 55: 264–275.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1960. Erste Mitteilung über die an brasilianischen Odonaten schmarotzenden Arrenurus-Larven (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Arch. Hydrobiol. 56: 425–440.Google Scholar
Musselius, A. 1914. Zur Biologie der Hydracarinen. Annls Biol. lacustre 7: 60–82.Google Scholar
Neuman, C.J. 1880. Om Sveriges Hydrachnider. K. svenska Vetensk-Akad. Handl. 17: 1–123.Google Scholar
Nielsen, G.J., and Davids, C.. 1975. Contributions to the knowledge of the morphology and biology of the larvae of four European Eylais species (Acari, Hydrachnellae). Acarologia 17: 519–528.Google Scholar
Oliver, D.R., and Smith, I.M.. 1980. Host associations of some pionid water mite larvae (Acari: Prostigmata: Pionidae) parasitic on chironomid imagos (Diptera: Chironomidae). Acta Univ. Carol., Biol.: 157–162.Google Scholar
Paterson, C.G., and MacLeod, R.K.. 1979. Observations on the life history of the water mite, Unionicola formosa (Acari: Hydrachnellae). Can. J. Zool. 57: 2047–2049.Google Scholar
Piatakov, M.L. 1916 a. K razvitiyu Eylais hamata Koen., Eylais infundibulifera Koen., i Hydrarachna geographica O.F. Müll. (Acarina, Limnocharidae). Russk. ent. Obozr. 15: 125–130.Google Scholar
Münchberg, P. 1916 b. O nekotorykh Eylais i Hydrarachna, parazitiruyushchikh pod nadkrylyami Dytiscidae i Gyrinidae (Acarina, Limnocharidae). Russk. ent. Obozr. 15: 508–510.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1892 a. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der im Süsswasser lebenden Milben. Zool. Anz. 15: 338–343.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1892 b. Eine neue Hydrachniden-Gattung aus dem sähsischen Erzgebirge. Zool. Anz. 15: 408–415.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1894. Hydrachnologische Berichtigungen. Zool. Anz. 17: 370–378.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1895. Beiträge zur Systematik und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Süsswassermilben. Zool. Anz. 18: 19–25.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1896. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der in Sachsen einheimischen Hydrachniden-Formen. Sitzunsber. naturf. Ges. Leipzig 22 u. 23: 33–103.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1897–1900. Deutschlands Hydrachniden. Zoologica 19. 601 pp.Google Scholar
Piersig, R.G. 1901. Hydrachnidae. In Piersig, R.G., and Lohmann, H.T. (Eds.), Acarina, Hydrachnidae und Halacaridae. Tierrich 13. 336 pp.Google Scholar
Prasad, V., and Cook, D.R.. 1972. The taxonomy of water mite larvae. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 18. 326 pp.Google Scholar
Protz, A.J.O. 1896. Beiträge zur Hydrachnidenkunde. Zool. Anz. 19: 23–26.Google Scholar
Rack, G. 1976. Milben (Acarina) von europäischen Limoniinen (Diptera, Nematocera). Mitt. hamb. zool. Mus. Inst. 73: 63–85.Google Scholar
Rack, G. 1977. Weitere Untersuchungen über Milben (Acarina) an Nematocera (Diptera). Acarologia 19: 20–25.Google Scholar
Rahman, S.J., Wattal, B.L., and Kumar, K.. 1979. A note on water mites (Arrenurus sp.) parasitizing Anopheles anularis Wulp. J. Commun. Dis. 11: 89–90.Google Scholar
Ravetta, E. 1933. Studio sulla biologia dell'idracaro Unionicola (Pentatax) bonzi (Claparède). Arch. zool. ital. 19: 439–447.Google Scholar
Redmond, B.L., and Lanciani, C.A.. 1982. Attachment and engorgement of a water mite Hydrachna virella (Acari: Parasitengona), parasitic on Buenoa scimitra (Hemiptera: Notonectidae). Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 101: 388–394.Google Scholar
Reinhard, L.V. 1924. On parasites found in the malaria mosquito Anopheles (preliminary note). Ekaterinosl. med. Zh. 807–809. (Rev. Appl. Ent. B. 13: 82).Google Scholar
Reisen, W.K., and Mullen, G.R.. 1978. Ecological observations on acarine associates (Acari) of Pakistan mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Environ. Ent. 7: 769–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, S.V., and Nielsen, L.T.. 1968. An ecological study of Aedes mosquitoes in uncontrolled areas in Tooele County, Utah. Proc. Utah Mosq. Abatement Assoc. 21: 37–44.Google Scholar
Schechtel, E.P. 1910. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Hydrachnidengattung Felaia. Bull. inf. Acad. Sci. Cracowie, Sér. B., Sci. natur.: 629–637.Google Scholar
Sergent, E., and Sergent, E.. 1904. Note sur les acariens parasites des Anopheles. C.r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. Paris 56: 100–102.Google Scholar
Simmons, T.W. 1985. New water mite (Prostigmata: Parasitengona)-chironomid (Diptera) associations from Otsego Lake, New York. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 93. In press.Google Scholar
Simmons, T.W., and Smith, I.M.. 1984. Morphology of larvae, deutonymphs, and adults of the water mite Najadicola ingens (Prostigmata: Parasitengona: Hygrobatoidea) with remarks on phylogenetic relationships and revision of taxonomic placement of Najadicolinae. Can. Ent. 116: 691–701.Google Scholar
Smith, B.P. 1983. The potential of mites as biological control agents of mosquitoes. pp. 79–85 in Hoy, M.A., Cunningham, G.L., and Knutson, L. (Eds.), Biological Control of Pests by Mites. Spec. Publs Univ. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn 3304.Google Scholar
Smith, B.P., and McIver, S.B.. 1984 a. The patterns of mosquito emergence (Diptera: Culicidae; Aedes spp.): their influence on host selection by parasitic mites (Acari: Arrenuridae: Arrenurus spp.). Can. J. Zool. 62: 1106–1113.Google Scholar
Smith, B.P., and McIver, S.B.. 1984 b. Factors influencing host selection and successful parasitism of Aedes spp. mosquitoes by Arrenurus spp. mites. Can. J. Zool. 62: 1114–1120.Google Scholar
Smith, B.P., and McIver, S.B.. 1984 c. The impact of Arrenurus danbyensis Mullen (Acari: Prostigmata; Arrenuridae) on a population of Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker) (Diptera: Culicidae). Can. J. Zool. 62: 1121–1134.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1976 a. A study of the systematics of the water mite family Pionidae (Prostigmata: Parasitengona). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 98. 249 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1976 b. An unusual new species of Neoacarus (Acari: Parasitengona: Neoacaridae) from a lake in Ontario. Can. Ent. 108: 993–995.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1977. Descriptions of larvae of some axonopsine water mites (Prostigmata: Parasitengona: Aturidae), with notes on the phylogenetic affinities of the subfamily. Can. Ent. 109: 953–966.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1978. Descriptions and observations on host associations of some larval Arrenuroidea (Prostigmata: Parasitengona), with comments on phylogeny in the superfamily. Can. Ent. 110: 957–1001.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1979. A review of water mites of the family Anisitsiellidae (Prostigmata: Lebertioidea) from North America. Can. Ent. 111: 529–550.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1982. Larvae of water mites of the genera of the superfamily Lebertioidea (Prostigmata: Parasitengona) in North America with comments on phylogeny and higher classification of the superfamily. Can. Ent. 114: 901–990.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1983 b. Description of larvae of Neoacarus occidentalis (Acari: Arrenuroidea: Neoacaridae). Can. Ent. 115: 221–226.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1983 b. Description of larvae and adults of Paramideopsis susanae n. gen., n. sp., with remarks on phylogeny and classification of Mideopsidae (Acari: Parasitengona: Arrenuroidea). Can. Ent. 115: 529–538.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1983 c. Description of larvae of Nudomideopsis magnacetabula (Acari: Arrenuroidea: Mideopsidae) with new distributional records for the species and remarks on the classification of Nudomideopsis. Can. Ent. 115: 913–919.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1983 d. Descriptions of two new species of Acalyptonotus from western North America, with a new diagnosis of the genus based upon larvae and adults, and comments on phylogeny and taxonomy of Acalyptonotidae (Acari: Parasitengona: Arrenuroidea). Can. Ent. 115: 1395–1408.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1984. Larvae of water mites of some genera of Aturidae (Prostigmata: Hygrobatoidea) in North America with comments on phylogeny and classification of the family. Can. Ent. 116: 307–374.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M., and Oliver, D.R.. 1976. The parasitic associations of larval water mites with imaginal aquatic insects, especially Chironomidae. Can. Ent. 108: 1427–1442.Google Scholar
Soar, C.D. 1896. British Hydrachnidae. Part VI. J. Microsc. (ser. 3) 6: 313–316.Google Scholar
Soar, C.D. 1901. Note on the occurrence of larval water-mites on various aquatic animals. J. Quekett microsc. Club (ser. 2) 8: 65–66.Google Scholar
Soar, C.D. 1906. Notes and observations on the life history of fresh-water mites. J. Quekett microsc. Club (ser. 2) 9: 359–370.Google Scholar
Soar, C.D., and Williamson, W.. 1925. The British Hydracarina, Vol. I. Ray Society, London. 216 pp.Google Scholar
Sokolow, I. 1924. Untersuchungen über die Eiablage und den Laich der Hydracarinen. I. Arch. Hydrobiol. 15: 383–405.Google Scholar
Sparing, I. 1959. Die Larven der Hydrachnellae, ihre parasitische Entwicklung und ihre Systematik. Parasit. SchrReihe 10: 1–168.Google Scholar
Speer, A.J. 1927. Compendium of the parasites of mosquitoes (Culicidae). U.S. Pub. Hlth. Ser., Hyg. Lab. Bull. 146. 36 pp.Google Scholar
Stechmann, D.H. 1977 a. Zur Morphologie mitteleuropäischer Arrenurus-Larven (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Acarologia 18: 503–518.Google Scholar
Stechmann, D.H. 1977 b. Zur Phänologie und zum Wirtsspektrum einiger an Zygopteren (Odonata) und Nematoceren (Diptera) ektoparasitisch auftretenden Arrenurus-Arten (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Z. angew. Ent. 82: 349–355.Google Scholar
Stechmann, D.H. 1978. Eiblage, Parasitismus und postparasitische Entwicklung von Arrenurus-Arten (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Z. ParasitKde. 57: 169–188.Google Scholar
Stechmann, D.H. 1980. Zum Wirtskreis syntopischer Arrenurus-Arten (Hydrachnellae, Acari) mit parasitischer Entwicklung an Nematocera (Diptera). Z. ParasitKde. 62: 267–283.Google Scholar
Stout, V.M. 1953 a. Eylais waikawae n. sp. (Hydracarina) and some features of its life history and anatomy. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 81: 389–416.Google Scholar
Stout, V.M. 1953 b. New species of Hydracarina, with description of the life history of two. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 81: 417–466.Google Scholar
Szalay, L. 1928. Adatok a Limnesia undulata O.F. Müll. postembryonalis fejlodéséhez. Allat. Közl. 25: 133–139.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. 1912. Der Bergbach des Sauerlands. Faunistisch-biologische Untersuchungen. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr./Suppl. IV: 1–125.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.H. 1964. The biology of Aedes vexans in Wisconsin (Culicidae, Diptera). Ph.D. thesis (unpublished), Univ. Wisconsin, Madison. pp. 169–171.Google Scholar
Thon, C. 1899. Über ein interessantes Beispiel des Parasitismus bei den Hydrachniden. Verh. zool.-bot. ges. Wien 49: 484.Google Scholar
Thon, C. 1901. Hydrachnidae (Wassermilben) der Umgebung von Podiebrad. pp. 123–144in Frič, A. und Vávra, W. (Eds.), Untersuchungen über die Fauna der Gewässer Böhmens. V. Untersuchung des Elbeflusses und seiner Altwässer. Arch. naturw. LandDurchforsch. Böhm. 11.Google Scholar
Thon, C. 1906. Monographie der Hydrachniden Böhmens. I. Teil. Limnocharidae Kramer. Arch. naturw. LandDurchforsch. Böhm. 12. 84 pp.Google Scholar
Thor, S. 1901. Fjerde bidrag til kundskaben om Norges Hydrachnider. “Norske hydrachnider”. IV. Arch. Math. Naturv. 23: 1–58.Google Scholar
Thor, S. 1912. Lebertia-Studien XXVI–XXVIII. Zool. Anz. 39: 529–536.Google Scholar
Thor, S. 1914. Glazialbiologische Beiträge. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr./Biol. Suppl. 3: 1–14.Google Scholar
Thor, S. 1925. Über die Phylogenie und Systematik der Acarina, mit Beiträgen zur ersten Entwicklungsgeschichte einzelner Gruppen. IV. Beiträge zur Ontogenie der Acarina. Nyt Mag. Naturvid. 62: 123–167.Google Scholar
Tomar, S.S., and Raychaudhuri, D.N.. 1983. Observations on the biology of Hydrachna trilobata (Hydracarina) in West Bengal, India. Acarologia 24: 289–293.Google Scholar
Tsai, Y.H., Grundmann, A.W., and Rees, D.M.. 1969. Parasites of mosquitoes in southwestern Wyoming and northern Utah. Mosquito News 29: 102–110.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1977. Postembrionalnoe razvitie vodjanogo kleshcha Sperchon clupeifer (Acariformes, Sperchonidae). Zool. Zh. 56: 1616–1628.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1978. K diagnozu Brachypoda (Hemibrachypoda) mutila (Walter, 1928) (Axonopsinae, Acariformes). Nauch. Dokl. vyssh. Shk. Biol. Nauki 4: 47–52.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1979. Lichinka Momonia falcipalpis Halbert, 1906 (Acariformes, Mideopsidae). Vest. Zool. 2: 69–71.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1980. Novyi vid vodyanogo kleshcha roda Thyas (Hydryphantidae, Acarina) s severnogo kavkaza. Parazitologiya 14: 18–25.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1981. Postembrional'nyye stadii vodyanogo kleshcha Torrenticola amplexa (Koenike, 1908) (Acariformes, Torrenticolidae). Ent. Obozr. 60: 205–213.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1982 a. Novyi vid vodyanogo kleshcha roda Pionacercus Piersig, 1894 (Pionidae, Acariformes). Nauch. Dokl. vyssh. Shk. Biol. Nauki 8: 29–34.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1982 b. Novyi rod i novyye vidy vodyanykh kleshchei s dopolneniyami k diagnozu semeistra Mideidae. Zool. Zh. 61: 199–209.Google Scholar
Uchida, T. 1932. Some ecological observations on water mites. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. (Ser. VI, Zoology) 1: 143–165.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1937. Water mites from Kyushu. Bull. biogeogr. Soc. Jap. 7: 9–29.Google Scholar
Tuzovskij, P.V. 1940. Über die Begattungsakt bei Forelia variegator. Annotnes Zool. jap. 19: 280–282.Google Scholar
Uchida, T. and Miyazaki, I.. 1935. Life-history of a water-mite parasitic on Anopheles. Proc. Imp. Acad. Jap. 11: 73–76.Google Scholar
Ullrich, F. 1978. Biologisch-ökologische Studien an den Larven rheophiler Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari). Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 54: 189–255.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1908. Hydrachnologische Beiträge. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen. 19: 267–275.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1910. Hydracarinologische Beiträge. III. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen. 20: 165–185.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1914. Über die Begattungsvorgänge bei Acercus-Arten. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr./Biol. Suppl. 6: 1–10.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1919. Liste von Hydracarinen aus dem Weserberglande bei Eschershausen (Kr. Holzminden). Arch. Naturgesch. 83: 10–21.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1921. Hydracarinen aus der Diemel. Arch. Hydrobiol. 13: 282–294.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1923. Hydracarinen aus Quellen. (Systematische und biologisch-faunistische Untersuchungen). Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 3: 156–384.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1925. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Hydracarinen aus Quellen Mitteleuropas. Zool. Jb. (Syst.) 50: 451–596.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1928. Zur Mikrofauna einer Quelle auf der Insel Herdla bei Bergen (Norwegen). Bergens Mus. Arb. 5. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1934. Sechste Mitteilung über Wassermilben aus unterirdischen Gewässern. Zool. Anz. 105: 273–281.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1935. Hydracarinen aus Jugoslawien. Arch. Hydrobiol. 29: 351–409.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1936. Wassermilben oder Hydracarina (Hydrachnellae und Halacaridae). In Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, F. Dahl, Jena, 31–32. 574 pp.Google Scholar
Viets, Karl. 1953. Einige neue Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari) aus San Salvador. Veröff. Mus. Nat.-Volker-Handelsk. Bremen. A. 2: 149–160.Google Scholar
Viets, K., and Plate, H.. 1954. Die ökologischen (parasitologischen) Beziehungen zwischen Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari) und Süsswasser-Mollusken. Z. angew. Ent. 35: 459–494.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H.L.W. 1941 a. Über den Parasitismus der Hydryphantes-Larven. Z. ParasitKde. 12: 144–156.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H.L.W. 1941 b. Über den Parasitismus der Feltria-Larven. Z. ParasitKde. 12: 362–371.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1962. Materialy po biologii i sistematike vodjanych kleshchei (Hydrachnellae). I. Lichinka Eylais infundibulifera Koenike, 1897. Byull. Inst. Biol. Vodokhran. 13: 14–18.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1963. Materialy po biologii i sistematike vodjanych kleshchei (Hydrachnellae). III. Opisanie neskolkich lichinok roda Eylais Latr., 1796. Trudy Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 6: 159–170.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1966 a. Novij vid vodjanogo kleshcha (Hydrachnellae) iz roda Hydrachna Müll., ego sistematicheskoe polozhenie i biologija. Trudy Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 12: 183–191.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1966 b. Materialy po biologii i sistematike vodjanych kleshchei (Hydrachnellae). VI. Lichinki Limnesia i Hydrovolzia. Trudy Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 12: 192–198.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1968. Lichinki roda Eylais Latr., 1796 (Hydrachnellae). Trudy Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 17: 82–99.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1969. Lichinka Forelia variegator (Koch, 1837) (Hydrachnellae). Inf. Byul. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 3: 21–22.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1973. Lichinka Oxus ovalis (Müller, 1776) (Lebertiidae, Acariformes). Inf. Byul. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 17: 39–42.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1976 a. Lichinki i sistema vodjanych kleshchei podsemejstra Pioninae (Hygrobatidae, Acariformes). Trudy Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 34: 29–69.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1976 b. Lichinki i sistema vodjanych kleshchei semejstra Hydrachnidae Leach, 1815 (Acariformes). Trudy Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod. 31: 133–155.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B.A. 1980. Opredelitel lichinok vodjanych kleshchei. Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod., Nauka. 238 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M. 1953. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Volume 1. Part I: General. Part II: The Zygoptera-damselflies. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 292 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M. 1958. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Volume 2. Part III: The Anisoptera-four families. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 318 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M., and Corbet, P.S.. 1975. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Volume 3. Part IV: The Anisopterafour families. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 307 pp.Google Scholar
Walter, C.W. 1915. Notizen über die Entwicklung torrentikoler Hydracarinen. Zool. Anz. 45: 442–456.Google Scholar
Walter, C.W. 1917. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Entwicklung bachbewohnender Milben. Verh. naturf. ges. Basel. 28: 148–164.Google Scholar
Walter, C.W. 1922 a. Hydracarinen aus den Alpen. Rev. suisse Zool. 29: 227–411.Google Scholar
Walter, C.W. 1922 b. Die Hydracarinen der Alpengewässer. Denkschr. schweiz. naturf. ges. 58: 60–251.Google Scholar
Wesenburg-Lund, C.J. 1918. Contributions to the knowledge of the postembryonal development of the Hydracarina. Vidensk. Meddr. dansk. naturh. Foren. 70: 5–57.Google Scholar
Whitsel, R.H., and Schoeppner, R.F.. 1973. Mites associated with aquatic and semi-aquatic Diptera from San Mateo County, California. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 75: 71–77.Google Scholar
Wiegert, R.G., and Mitchell, R.D.. 1973. Ecology of Yellowstone thermal effluent systems: Intersects of bluegreen algae, grazing flies (Paracoenia, Ephydridae) and water mites (Partnuniella, Hydrachnellae). Hydrobiologia 41: 251–271.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B., Mackay, R.J., and Smith, I.M.. 1980. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl. 58: 97–206.Google Scholar
Wolcott, R.H. 1905. A review of the genera of water mites. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 26: 161–243.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1953. An interesting new larval species of Panisopsis (Thyasidae, Acarina) from New Zealand. Rec. Canterbury Mus. 6: 233–235.Google Scholar
Zakhidov, M.T. 1973. Mermithid parasites of some organisms serving as fodder for fish. Gidrobiol. Zh. 9: 99–102.Google Scholar