Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:50:39.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE REPRODUCTIVE CYCLES OF MALE AND FEMALE LYTTA NUTTALLI (COLEOPTERA: MELOIDAE)13

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. H. Gerber
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Winnipeg, Manitoba
N. S. Church
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

Abstract

Laboratory experiments showed that female Lytta nuttalli Say are capable of developing and depositing more than one batch of eggs. The largest number of batches deposited by a female was 5. Batches laid by one female are the same size, and each batch represents one gonadotropic cycle. Most females lay every 4 to 8 days, the most frequent intervals between consecutive ovipositions being 5 and 6 days. The females copulate at least once before the first oviposition and usually again within 24 h after each oviposition. The first copulation stimulates oocyte maturation and probably also deposition of the first batch of eggs. Additional copulations are not needed for the development and deposition of subsequent egg batches, but appear to stimulate egg output. Sufficient spermatozoa are transferred to the female during the one or more copulations preceding the first oviposition to fertilize all the eggs she produces. The largest number of copulations by a male was 9. Males can copulate as frequently as every 24 h, but the most frequent intervals between copulations in virile males are 2 and 3 days. The basic features of the reproductive cycles of male and female L. nuttalli are found in other Meloinae and probably are characteristic of the subfamily. The fairly large quantities of spermatophoral materials from repeated copulations may be important in the nutrition of the female.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balduf, W. V. 1935. The bionomics of entomophagous Coleoptera. John S. Swift, New York.Google Scholar
Beauregard, H. 1890. Les insectes vésicants. Baillière, Paris.Google Scholar
Benz, G. 1969. Influence of mating, insemination, and other factors on oogenesis and oviposition in the moth Zeiraphera diniana. J. Insect Physiol. 15: 5571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, N. S. and Gerber, G. H.. Observations on the ontogeny and habits of Lytta nuttalli, L. viridana, and L. cyanipennis (Coleoptera: Meloidae): The adults and eggs. Can. Ent. In press.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous insects. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
De Wilde, J., and de Loof, A.. 1973. Reproduction — Endocrine control. In The physiology of Insecta. Edited by Rockstein, M.. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dick, J. 1937. Oviposition in certain Coleoptera. Ann. appl. Biol. 24: 762796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, F. 1968. Endocrine control of reproduction in insects. A. Rev. Ent. 13: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, F. 1970. The physiology of insect reproduction. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gerber, G. H. and Church, N. S.. 1973. Courtship and copulation in Lytta nuttalli (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Can. Ent. 105: 719724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, G. H., Church, N. S., and Rempel, J. G.. 1971 a. The anatomy, histology, and physiology of the reproductive systems of Lytta nuttalli Say (Coleoptera: Meloidae). I. The internal genitalia. Can. J. Zool. 49: 523533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, G. H., Church, N. S., and Rempel, J. G.. 1971 b. The structure, formation, histochemistry, fate, and functions of the spermatophore of Lytta nuttalli Say (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Can. J. Zool. 49: 15951610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbertson, G. I. and Horsfall, W. R.. 1940. Blister beetles and their control. S. Dak. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 340.Google Scholar
Highnam, K. C. 1964. Endocrine relationships in insect reproduction. R. ent. Soc. Lond. Symp. 2: 2642.Google Scholar
Hocking, B. 1949. Hornia minutipennis Riley: a new record and some notes on behavior (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Can. Ent. 81: 6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, W. R. 1941. Biology of the black blister beetle (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 34: 114126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, W. R. 1943. Biology and control of common blister beetles in Arkansas. Univ. Ark. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 436.Google Scholar
Huignard, J. 1969. Action stimulatrice du spermatophore sur l'ovogenèse chez Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Insecte, Coléoptère). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 268: 29382940.Google Scholar
Huignard, J. 1970. Influences comparées de la plante hôte et de la copulation sur l'ovogenèse puis sur la ponte chez Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coléoptère, Bruchidae). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 271: 21712174.Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. 1949. Spermatophore production in Trichoptera and some other insects. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 100: 449479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, V. 1960. Origin, development and function of the spermatophore in the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha L.). Cas. čsl. Spol. ent. 57: 297316.Google Scholar
Leroi, B. 1970. Influence de l'activité continue et du vieilissement des males sur la fécondité des femelles d'Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coléoptère, Cucujidae). Colloques int. Cent. natn. Rech. scient. 189: 331347.Google Scholar
Linsley, E. G. and MacSwain, J. W.. 1942. Bionomics of the meloid genus Hornia (Coleoptera). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 7: 189206.Google Scholar
MacSwain, J. W. 1956. A classification of the first instar larvae of the Meloidae (Coleoptera). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 12: 1182.Google Scholar
Parker, J. B. and Böving, A. G.. 1924. The blister beetle Tricrania sanguinipennis Say — Biology, descriptions of different stages, and systematic relationship. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 64: 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J. D. and Selander, R. B.. 1970. The binomics of blister beetles of the genus Meloe and a classification of the new world species. Ill. biol. Monogr. 42. Univ. Ill. Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Riddiford, L. M. and Ashenhurst, J. B.. 1973. The switchover from virgin to mated behavior in female cecropia moths: the role of the bursa copulatrix. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 144: 162171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, C. V. 1878. On the larval characters and habits of the blister-beetles belonging to the genus Macrobasis LeC. and Epicauta Fabr., with remarks on other species of the family Meloidae. Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci. 3: 544562.Google Scholar
Selander, R. B. 1960. Bionomics, systematics, and phylogeny of Lytta, a genus of blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Ill. biol. Monogr. 28. Univ. Ill. Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Selander, R. B. 1964. Sexual behavior in blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). I. The genus Pyrota. Can. Ent. 96: 10371082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. B. and Bohart, G. E.. 1954. The biology of Zonitis atripennis flavida LeConte (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Wasmann J. Biol. 12: 227243.Google Scholar
Selander, R. B. and Mathieu, J. M.. 1969. Ecology, behavior, and adult anatomy of the albida group of the genus Epicauta (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Ill. biol. Monogr. 41. Univ. Ill. Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Selander, R. B. and Pinto, J. D.. 1967. Sexual behavior in blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). II. Linsleya convexa. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 40: 396412.Google Scholar
Verbeek, F. A. T. H. 1932. De ontwikkelings-stadia van Mylabris en Epicauta in de tropen. Tijdschr. Ent. 75: 163169.Google Scholar