Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:05:20.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REDESCRIPTION OF AND HOST-INDUCED ANTENNAL VARIATION IN ANAPHES IOLE GIRAULT (HYMENOPTERA: MYMARIDAE), AN EGG PARASITE OF MIRIDAE (HEMIPTERA) IN NORTH AMERICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John T. Huber  and
V.K. Rajakulendran
John T. Huber*
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Canada
V.K. Rajakulendran
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA77843
*
1 Correspondence address: Biosystematics Research Centre, K. W. Neatby Building, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anaphes iole Girault is redescribed from specimens reared from Lygus hesperus Knight and Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter). Anaphes anomocerus, A. ovijentatus, and A. perdubius are synonyms of A. iole. Host-induced morphological variation is discussed. The main attributes that vary with host are the relative size of certain funicular articles and their complement of sensory ridges. There is no morphological overlap between populations as indicated by measurements of most other structures. However, certain structural features that can be used to define the species unequivocally were found.

Résumé

Anaphes iole Girault est redécrit de spécimens élevés de Lygus hesperus Knight et Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter). Anaphes anomocerus, A. ovijentatus, et A. perdubius sont synonymes de A. iole. La variation morphologique occasionnée par l’hôte est décrite. Les attributs principaux qui varient selon l’hôte sont la grandeur relative de certains articles du funicule et leur complément de crêtes sensorielles. Il n’y a pas de recouvrement morphologique entre les populations comme indiquent les mesures d’autres traits structuraux. Néanmoins, certains traits structuraux ont été trouvés qui pourraient servir à distinguer cette espèce sans équivoque.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 10 , October 1988 , pp. 893 - 901
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakkendorf, O. 1960. Description of Anaphoidea chrysomelae n.sp. (Hym., Mymaridae). Ent. Meddr 29: 372–375.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979. Family Mymaridae. pp. 1022–1033 in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico, Vol. 1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1198 pp.Google Scholar
Chiappini, E. 1987. Ricerche sulla variabilità di Anagrus atomus (L.) (Hymenoptera Mymaridae) e di una specie affine presente sul rovo. Boll. Zool. agr. Bachic. Ser. II 19: 71–97.Google Scholar
Clancy, D.W., and Pierce, H.D.. 1966. Natural enemies of some Lygus bugs. J. econ. Ent. 59: 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, C.R., and Leonard, M.D.. 1914. An egg-parasite of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus pratensis L. Can. Ent. 46: 181–182.Google Scholar
Flock, R.A., Doutt, R.L., Dickson, R.C., and Laird, E.F. Jr., 1962. A survey of beet leafhopper egg parasites in the Imperial Valley, California. J. econ. Ent. 55: 277–281.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1911. Descriptions of North American Mymaridae with synonymic and other notes on described genera and species. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 37: 253–324.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1916. Notes on North American Mymaridae and Trichogrammatidae (Hym.). Ent. News 27: 4–8.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1929. North American Hymenoptera Mymaridae. pp. 1–27. Addendum ’New insects mostly Australian”. pp. 28–29. Privately printed.Google Scholar
Graham, H.M., and Jackson, C.G.. 1982. Distribution of eggs and parasites of Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae), Nabis spp. (Hemiptera: Nabidae), and Spissistilus festinus (Say) (Homoptera: Membracidae) on plant stems. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 75: 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, H.M., Jackson, C.G., and Debolt, J.W.. 1986. Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) and their parasites in agricultural areas of southern Arizona. Environ. Ent. 15: 132–142.Google Scholar
Hansson, C. 1985. Taxonomy and biology of the palaearctic species of Chrysocharis Förster, 1856 (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Ent. Scand. Suppl. 26. 130 pp.Google Scholar
Huber, J.T. 1987. Review of Schizophragma Ogloblin and the non-Australian species of Stethynium Enock (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Can. Ent. 119: 823–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J.T. 1988. The species groups of Gonatocerus Nees in North America with a revision of the sulphuripes and ater groups (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 141. In press.Google Scholar
Jackson, C.G. 1986. Effects of cold storage of adult Anaphes ovijentatus on survival, longevity, and oviposition. SWest. Ent. 11: 149–153.Google Scholar
Jackson, C.G. 1987. Biology of Anaphes ovijentatus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and its host, Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) at low and high temperatures. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 80: 367–372.Google Scholar
Jackson, C.G., and Cohen, A.C.. 1984. Temperature and water relations of a parasitic wasp in its free-living adult stage and its phytophagous host. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 74A: 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.G., and Debolt, J.W.. 1987. Augmentative releases of parasites. p. 12 in Day, W.H. (compiler), Proceedings of the 4th Regular Meeting of the Mind Work Group, October 14–15, 1987, at the USDA Beneficial Insects Research Laboratory, Newark, Delaware.Google Scholar
Jackson, C.G., and Graham, H.M.. 1983. Parasitism of four species of Lygus (Hemiptera: Miridae) by Anaphes ovijentatus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and an evaluation of other possible hosts. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 76: 772–775.Google Scholar
Janson, L.-A. 1986. Morphometric studies of some Pteromalus Swederus species (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) with emphasis on allometric relationships, or: are ratios reliable in chalcid taxonomy? Syst. Ent. 11: 75–82.Google Scholar
Johnson, N.F., Rawlings, J.E., and Pavuk, D.M.. 1987. Host-related antennal variation in the polyphagous egg parasite Telenomus alsophilae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Syst. Ent. 12: 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerdirk, D.E, and Moratorio, M.S.. 1987. Morphometric study of Anagrus giraulti Crawford (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) reared from eggs of three different cicadellid hosts. Can. Ent. 119: 909–912.Google Scholar
Moratorio, M.S. 1987. Effect of host species on the parasitoids Anagrus mutans and Anagrus silwoodensis Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Environ. Ent. 16: 825–827.Google Scholar
New, T.R. 1969. The biology of some species of Alaptus (Mymaridae) parasitizing eggs of Psocoptera. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 18: 181–193.Google Scholar
Patana, R., and Debolt, J.W.. 1985. Rearing Lygus hesperus in the laboratory. U.S. Dep. Agric. ARS-45. 9 pp.Google Scholar
Rajakulendran, S.V. 1986. A survey for the parasitoids of the cotton fleahopper Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter) in its wild habitat and the biology of two egg parasitoids of the pest. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. 153 pp.Google Scholar
Rajakulendran, S.V., and Cate, J.R.. 1986. Laboratory rearing procedures for two egg parasitoids of cotton fleahopper Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter). SWest. Ent. 11: 255–261.Google Scholar
Stoner, A., and Surber, D.E.. 1969. Notes on the biology and rearing of Anaphes ovijentatus, a new parasite of Lygus hesperus in Arizona. J. econ. Ent. 62: 501–502.Google Scholar
Stoner, A. 1971. Development of Anaphes ovijentatus, an egg parasite of Lygus hesperus, in relation to temperature. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1566–1567.Google Scholar
Sveum, P., and Solem, J.O.. 1980. Anaphes cultripennis Debauché, 1948 (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae) in Norway. Fauna norv. Ser. B 27: 17–18.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. 1958. Mymarid. pp. 565–572 in A Catalogue of the Parasites and Predators of Insect Pests. Section 2. Host Parasite Catalogue. Part 5. Hosts of the Hymenoptera (Miscogasteridae to Trigonalidae), Lepidoptera and Strepsiptera. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Ottawa. pp. 562–698.Google Scholar
Underhill, G.W. 1924. The lesser clover weevil. Q. Bull. Va St. Crop Pest Commn 6(1). 7 pp.Google Scholar
Varis, A.L. 1972. The biology of Lygus rugulipennis Popp. (Het., Miridae) and the damage caused by this species to sugar beet. Ann. agric. Fenn. 11: 1–56.Google Scholar
Woolley, J.B., and Browning, H.W.. 1987. Morphometric analysis of uniparental Aphytis reared from chaff scale, Parlatoria pergandii Comstock, on Texas citrus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae, Homoptera: Diaspididae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 89: 77–94.Google Scholar