Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:27:40.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

QUEEN HONEY BEE MANDIBULAR PHEROMONE DOES NOT AFFECT WORKER OVARY DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L.G. Willis ,
M.L. Winston  and
K.N. Slessor
L.G. Willis
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
M.L. Winston
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
K.N. Slessor
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry/Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the dose-dependent effects of synthetic honey bee queen mandibular pheromone on the inhibition of worker ovary development. The range of doses examined was from 10−3 to 10 queen equivalents (Qeq) per day for 43 days; 1 Qeq was the amount of pheromone in an average pair of queen mandibular glands. Ovary class and ovariole number scores were used as estimates of worker ovary development. Queen mandibular pheromone did not inhibit ovary development in workers at any dose.

Résumé

Les effets de la dépendance à la dose du phéromone mandibulaire synthétique de la reine de l’abeille domestique ont été étudiés. Les doses essayées se sont étendues à partir de 10−3 jusqu’à 10 reine équivalentes (Qeq) par jour pendant 43 jours; 1 Qeq étant la quantité en moyenne de phéromone dans une paire de glandes mandibulaires de la reine. La catégorie des ovaires et le compte du nombre d’ovarioles ont été utilisés pour évaluer le développement des ovaires des ouvrières. Aucune dose du phéromone mandibulaire de la reine n’a inhibé le développement de l’ovaire chez les ouvrières.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 122 , Issue 6 , December 1990 , pp. 1093 - 1099
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, C.G. 1957. The control of ovary development in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera). Experientia 13: 256–257.10.1007/BF02157449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C.G. 1959. The source of the substance produced by a queen honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) which inhibits development of ovaries of the workers of her colony. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 34: 137–138.Google Scholar
Butler, C.G., Callow, R.K., and Johnston, N.C.. 1962. The isolation and synthesis of queen substance, 9-oxodectrans-2-enoic acid, a honey bee pheromone. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 155: 417–432.Google Scholar
Butler, C.G., and Fairey, E.M.. 1963. The role of the queen in preventing oogenesis in worker honey bees. J. Apic. Res. 2: 14–18.10.1080/00218839.1963.11100051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, W.J. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Crewe, R.M., and Velthuis, H.H.W.. 1980. False queens: a consequence of mandibular gland signals in worker honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 67: 467–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, A.P., and Voogd, S.. 1954. On the ovary development in queenless worker bees (Apis mellifica L.). Experientia 10: 384–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. 1987. Pheromones of Social Bees. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Jay, S.C. 1970. The effect of various combinations of immature queens and worker bees on the ovary development of worker honeybees in colonies with and without queens. Can. J. Zool. 48: 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C.G. 1972. Ovary development of worker honeybees when separated from worker brood by various methods. Can. J. Zool. 50: 661–664.Google Scholar
Jay, S.C., and Jay, D.H.. 1976. The effect of various types of brood comb on the ovary development of worker honeybees. Can. J. Zool. 54: 1724–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, S.C., and Nelson, E.V.. 1973. The effects of laying worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) and their brood on the ovary development of other worker honeybees. Can. J. Zool. 51: 629–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, L.-A., Slessor, K.N., Winston, M.L., Hay, N.W., and Borden, J.H.. 1990. Honeybee responses to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 841–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropacova, S., and Haslbachova, H.. 1970. The development of ovaries in worker honeybees in queenright colonies examined before and after swarming. J. Apic. Res. 9: 65–70.10.1080/00218839.1970.11100249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropacova, S., and Haslbachova, H.. 1971. The influence of queenlessness and of unsealed brood on the development of ovaries in worker honey bees. J. Apic. Res. 10: 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milojevic, B.D., and Filipovic-Moskovijevic, V.. 1959. Gruppeneffekt bei Honigbienen. II. Eierstockentwichlung bei Arbeitsbienen im Kleinvolk. Bull. Acad. Serbe Sci. Cl. Sci. Math. Nat. 32: 45–49.Google Scholar
Mussbichler, A. 1952. Die Bedeutung ausserer Einflusse und der Corpora Allata bei der Afterweiselentstehung von Apis mellifica. Z. vergl. Physiol. 34: 207–221.10.1007/BF00298201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, J. 1961. Sur la pheromone des reines d'abeilles et ses effets physiologiques. Ann. Abeille 24: 12.Google Scholar
Perepelova, L.I. 1929. Laying workers, the egg laying activity of the queen, and swarming. Bee World 10: 69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, M., and Baumann, M.. 1964. Uber Komplexe von subepidermalen Drusenzellen (Duftdrusen?) der Bienenkonigin. Naturwissenschaften 51: 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakagami, S.F. 1958. The false queen: fourth adjustive response in dequeened honeybee colonies. Behavior 13: 280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slessor, K.N., Kaminski, L.-A., King, G.G.S., Borden, J.H., and Winston, M.L.. 1988. Semiochemical basis of the retinue to queen honey bees. Nature 332: 354–356.10.1038/332354a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slessor, K.N., Kaminski, L.-A., King, G.G.S., and Winston, M.L.. 1990. Semiochemicals of the honey bee mandibular glands. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 851–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Erp, A. 1960. Mode of action of the inhibitory substance of the honeybee queen. Insectes Sociaux 7: 207–211.10.1007/BF02224491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, H.H.W. 1970 a. Ovarian development in Apis mellifera worker bees. Entomologia exp. appl. 13: 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, H.H.W. 1970 b. Queen substance from the abdomen of the honey bee queen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 70: 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, H.H.W., and van Es, J.. 1964. Some functional aspects of the mandibular glands of the queen honeybee. J. Apic. Res. 3: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, H.H.W., Verheijen, F.J., and Gottenbos, A.J.. 1965. Laying worker honey bee: similarities to the queen. Nature 207: 1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verheijen-Voogd, C. 1959. How worker bees perceive the presence of their queen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 41: 527–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierling, G., and Renner, M.. 1977. The secretion of the tergite glands and the attractiveness of the honey bee queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voogd, S. 1955. Inhibition of ovary development in worker bees by extraction fluid of the queen. Experientia 11: 181–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M.L. 1987. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Winston, M.L., Slessor, K.N., Willis, L.G., Naumann, K., Higo, H.A., Wyborn, M.H., and Kaminski, L.-A.. 1989. The influence of queen-produced mandibular pheromones on worker attraction during swarming and the inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Sociaux 36: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M.L., Higo, H.A., and Slessor, K.N.. 1990. The effect of various dosages of queen mandibular pheromone on the inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 83: 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar