Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T05:48:37.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Proventriculus of the Diamond Beetle, Entimus nobilis Oliv. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. W. Judd
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario

Extract

The diamond beetle, Entimus nobilis Oliv., is a weevil whose larva causes irregular tubercles on the woody tissues of the twining vine Stigmaphyllum littorale Juss., cultivated in the American tropics. Bruch (1932) reports that the adult weevil may be from 10 to 28 mm. in length. The specimens in which the proventriculus was examined were adults 28 mm. long from a series of pinned insects collected in Brazil.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beal, J. A. 1927. The development of the proventriculus of Pityogenes hopkinsi Swaine. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 20: 522539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruch, C. 1932. Metamorphosis de Entimus nobilis Oliv. (Coleopt., Curculionidae). Revista de Entomologia, 2: 179185.Google Scholar
Dennell, R. 1942. The structure and function of the mouth-parts, rostrum and fore-gut of the weevil, Calandra granaria L. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 231: 247291.Google Scholar
Eaton, C. B. 1942. The anatomy and histology of the proventriculus of Ips radiatae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 35: 4149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felt, E. P. 1906. Insects affecting park and woodland trees. New York State Museum Memoir No. 8, part 2.Google Scholar
Kaston, B. J. 1936. The morphology of the elm bark beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichoff.). Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 387.Google Scholar
Lindemann, K. 1876. Monographie der Borkenkäfer Russlands. Bull. Soc. Imp. des Naturalistes de Moscou, 51: 148169, 320–380.Google Scholar
Lindemann, K. 1877. Monographie der Borkenkäfer Russlands. Bull, Soc. Imp. des Naturalistes de Moscou, 52: 159187.Google Scholar
Lindemann, K. 1879. Monographie der Borkenkäfer Russlands. Bull. Soc. Imp. des Naturalistes de Moscou, 54: 5387.Google Scholar
Muller, K. 1928. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Kornkäfers Calandra granaria L. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie, 13: 313374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusslin, O. 1910. Zur Anatomie und Biologie der Borkenkäfergattung Cryphalus. I. Die weiblichen Genitalien. Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Forst – und Landwirtschaft, 8: 289298.Google Scholar
Nusslin, O. 1911. Phylogenie und System der Borkenkäfer. Zeitschrift für wissenchaftliche Insektenbiologie, 7: 109112, 145–156, 248–255, 271–278.Google Scholar
Murray, F. V. and Tiegs, O. W.. 1935. The metamorphosis of Calandra oryzae. Quart. Jour. Microscop. Sci., 77: 405495.Google Scholar
Schedl, K. E. 1931. Morphology of the bark beetles of the genus Gnathotrichus Eichh. Smithsonian Miscell. Coll., 82: 188.Google Scholar
Ting, P. C. 1933. Feeding mechanisms of weevils, their function, and relationship to classification. Monthly Bull. California Dept. Agric. 22: 161165.Google Scholar
Tissot, A. N. 1938. The gross anatomy of the digestive and reproductive systems of Naupactus leucoloma Boh. (Curculionidae, Coleoptera). Florida Entomologist, 21: 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar