Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:54:23.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PREY PREFERENCES OF ADULT AND IMMATURE ZETZELLIA MALI EWING (ACARI: STIGMAEIDAE) AND TYPHLODROMUS CAUDIGLANS SCHUSTER (ACARI: PHYTOSEIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David R. Clements
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
Rudolf Harmsen
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

Extract

Effective management of the interactions within the mite community is critical to biological control of economically damaging phytophagous mites such as Panonychus ulmi Koch (Tetranychidae) (Clements and Harmsen 1990). Although much is known about the potential role of phytoseiid mites in controlling P. ulmi (Dover et al. 1979), mites from at least seven other families may be present in apple orchards (Thistlewood 1991). Stigmaeid mites are predators which may play a beneficial role in biological control in conjunction with phytoseiids (Clements and Harmsen 1992). Eriophyid mites are phytophagous but seldom cause economic damage, and may compete with tetranychids and provide alternative food for predators of tetranychids (Croft and Hoying 1977).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chesson, J. 1983. The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64: 12971304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D.R. 1990. The apple rust mite, Aculus schlechtendali (Acari: Eriophyidae): A beneficial pest. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 121: 127128.Google Scholar
Clements, D.R., and Harmsen, R.. 1990. Predatory behavior and prey-stage preferences of stigmaeid and phytoseiid mites and their potential compatibility in biological control. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 321328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D.R., and Harmsen, R.. 1992. Stigmaeid–phytoseiid interactions and the impact of natural enemy complexes on plant-inhabiting mites. Experimental & Applied Acarology 14: 327341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, B.A., and Hoying, S.A., 1977. Competitive displacement of Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae) by Aculus schlechtendali (Acarina: Eriophyidae) in apple orchards. The Canadian Entomologist 109: 10251034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, M.J., Croft, B.A.. Welch, D.M., and Tummala, R.L.. 1979. Biological control of Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae) by Amblyseius fallacis (Acarina Phytoseiidae) on apple: A prey–predator model. Environmental Entomology 8: 282292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B.F.J. 1974. A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics 30: 281294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, M.A. 1991. Searching behavior and associational response of Zetzellia mali (Acarina: Stigmaeidae). Experimental & Applied Acarology 11: 8187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strapazzon, A., and Monta, L. Dalla. 1988. Role and distribution of Amblyseius andersoni Chant and Zetzellia mali Ewing in apple orchards infested by Aculus schlechtendali Nalepa. Redia 71: 3954.Google Scholar
Thistlewood, H.M.A. 1991. A survey of predatory mites in Ontario apple orchards with diverse pesticide programs. The Canadian Entomologist 123: 11631174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar