Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:57:29.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predispersal seed predation by a coleophorid on the threatened Gulf of St. Lawrence aster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Royce Steeves*
Affiliation:
Floristic Diversity Research Group, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Vazrick Nazari
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Jean-François Landry
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Neatby Building, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Christian R. Lacroix
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada C1A 4P3
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

The Gulf of St. Lawrence aster, Symphyotrichum laurentianum (Fernald) G.L. Nesom (Asteraceae), a small annual halophyte endemic to disturbed and highly transient habitats in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, is classified as “threatened” by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Lepidopteran larvae that are predispersal seed predators of the Gulf of St. Lawrence aster are reported for the first time from populations in Prince Edward Island National Park. DNA barcoding was used to identify the seed predators tentatively as larvae of the casebearing moth Coleophora triplicis McDunnough (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), which is typically associated with a related halophyte, Solidago sempervirens L. (Asteraceae). These larvae were found to consume a large proportion of seeds from one of two aster populations in Prince Edward Island National Park and may be yet another risk to the survival of this threatened species.

Résumé

L’aster du golfe du Saint-Laurent, Symphyotrichum laurentianum (Fernald) Nesom (Asteraceae), une petite plante halophyte endémique des habitats perturbés et très éphémères du golfe du Saint-Laurent, est considéré comme “menacé” par le Comité sur le statut des espèces menacées de disparition au Canada. Nous signalons ici pour la première fois l’existence de chenilles prédatrices des graines de l’aster du golfe du Saint-Laurent avant leur dispersion dans des populations du parc national de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard (PEINP). Nous avons identifié provisoirement ces prédateurs des graines à l’aide des codes-barres de l’ADN comme étant les larves du porte-case Coleophora triplicis McDunnough (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) typiquement associé à une plante halophyte apparentée, Solidago sempervirens L. (Asteraceae). Ces chenilles consomment une forte proportion des graines dans l’une des deux populations d’asters du PEINP et elles constituent un danger supplémentaire qui pourrait mettre en péril la survie de cette espèce menacée.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldizzone, G., van der Wolf, H., and Landry, J.-F. 2006. Coleophoridae, Coleophorinae (Lepidoptera). Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucheli, S., Landry, J.-F., and Wenzel, J. 2002. Larval case architecture and implications of host-plant associations for North American Coleophora (Lepidoptera; Coleophoridae). Cladistics, 18: 7193.Google Scholar
Colling, G., and Matthies, D. 2004. The effects of plant population size on the interactions between the endangered plant Scorzonera humilis, a specialised herbivore, and a phytopathogenic fungus. Oikos, 105: 7178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSEWIC. 2004. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Gulf of St. Lawrence aster, Symphyotrichum laurentianum, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Emmet, A.M., Langmaid, J.R., Bland, K.P., Corley, M.F.V., and Razowski, J. 1996. Coleophoridae. In The moths of Great Britain and Ireland. Edited by Emmet, A.M.. Harley Books, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom. pp. 126338.Google Scholar
Fenner, M., Cresswell, J.E., Hurley, R.A., and Baldwin, T. 2002. Relationship between capitulum size and pre-dispersal seed predation by insect larvae in common Asteraceae. Oecologia, 130: 7277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajibabaei, M., Dewaard, J.R., Ivanova, N.V., Ratnasingham, S., Dooh, R.T., Kirk, S.L., Mackie, P.M., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2005. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 360(1462): 19591967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., and Dewaard, J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 270(1512): 313321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrich, C. 1923. Family 15. Coleophoridae. In The Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states: primitive forms, microlepidoptera, pyralids, bombyces. Edited by Forbes, W.T.M.. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station (New York), Memoir, 68: 202217.Google Scholar
Hering, E.M. 1951. Biology of leaf miners. Dr.Junk, W., The Hague, the Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, F., and Haber, E. 1990. Status of the St. Lawrence aster, Aster laurentianus (Asteraceae), in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 104(3): 455459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, K., Bateman, A., and Durbin, R. 2002. QuickTree: building huge neighbour-joining trees of protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 18(11): 15461547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janzen, D.H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2: 465492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesen, J., and Loeschcke, V. 1996. Distribution, abundance and oviposition patterns of four coexisting Chiastocheta species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). The Journal of Animal Ecology, 65(5): 567576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J.F., and Lacroix, C.R. 2004. Estimation of seed bank and seed viability of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence aster, Symphyotrichum laurentianum, (Fernald) Nesom. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 118(1): 105110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16: 111120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruess, A., and Tscharntke, T. 2000. Species richness and parasitism in a fragmented landscape: experiments and field studies with insects on Vicia sepium. Oecologia, 122(1): 129137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, C.R., Steeves, R., and Kemp, J.F. 2007. Floral development, fruit set, and dispersal of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence aster (Symphyotrichum laurentianum) (Fernald) Nesom. Canadian Journal of Botany, 85: 331341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, J.-F., 1998. Répartition géographique, plantes nourricières et notes taxonomiques sur 29 espèces de Coleophora (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) au Québec. Fabreries, 23: 25104.Google Scholar
McDunnough, J.H. 1940. Some Maritime Coleophoridae (Lepid.). Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 34: 5368.Google Scholar
McDunnough, J.H. 1946. Notes on the ericoides–duplicis group of the genus Coleophora (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae). The Canadian Entomologist, 78: 147153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzbergova, Z. 2006. Ploidy level interacts with population size and habitat conditions to determine the degree of herbivory damage in plant populations. Oikos, 115: 443452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitou, N., and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylo-genetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4(4): 406425.Google Scholar
Stewart, S.E., and Lacroix, C.R. 2001. Germination potential, updated population surveys and floral, seed and seedling morphology of Symphyotrichum laurentianum, the Gulf of Saint Lawrence aster, in the Prince Edward Island National Park. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 115(2): 287295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar