Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:02:09.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE FIR ENGRAVER, SCOLYTUS VENTRALIS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE): I. ANALYSIS OF POPULATION BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL FROM 1964 TO 19711

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Alan A. Berryman
Alan A. Berryman
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Populations of the fir engraver reached epidemic proportions and then declined to a very low level over the study period (1964–71). However, population density within infested trees showed an inverse relationship to overall population trend. The population trend over the past 40 years was associated to some degree with rainfall deficits and with Douglas-fir tussock moth outbreaks.

The major contribution to total mortality in each generation occurred in the larval, pupal and pre-emergent adult stages, next was adult mortality and infecundity, while egg mortality was of least significance. Mortality and infertility of parent females was mainly caused by nematode parasites although host resistance resulted in a significant number of attack failures. Parasitism by a phorid fly was of minor importance. Nematode parasitism appeared to be density-dependent in relation to overall population size.

Most egg mortality resulted from host resistance which was inversely related to egg density within trees. Other egg mortality occurred in a density-independent manner.

Mortality between larva and brood adult stages was mainly attributed to intra- and interspecific competition. The impact of these factors was directly related to within-tree larval density. Nematode parasitism was related to overall fir engraver population size and to per cent infection of attacking females. Predator activity was weakly density-dependent and mortality caused by resinosis was inversely related to fir engraver density. Parasitism and other mortality factors appeared to be independent of host density.

An hypothesis is presented for the population behavior of the fir engraver; population fluctuations being determined by the quantity of susceptible trees and ultimately regulated by intraspecific competition. Nematode parasitism and interspecific competition were regarded as modifying, and perhaps sometimes regulating, abundance. Areas needing additional study, particularly host-tree physiology are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 11 , November 1973 , pp. 1465 - 1488
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashraf, M. and Berryman, A. A.. 1969. Biology of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Abies grandis in northern Idaho. Melanderia 2. 23 pp.Google Scholar
Ashraf, M. and Berryman, A. A.. 1970 a. Biology of Sulphuretylenchus elongatus (Nematoda: Sphaerulariidae), and its effect on its host, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 102: 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, M. and Berryman, A. A.. 1970 b. Histopathology of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infected by Sulphuretylenchus elongatus (Nematoda: Sphaerulariidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 924–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, R. A. 1967. The development and expression of population tables for the bark beetle, Scolytus scolytus (F.). J. Anim. Ecol. 35: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1967. Estimation of Dendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) mortality caused by insect predators. Can. Ent. 99: 1009–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1968 a. Distributions of Scolytus ventralis attacks, emergence, and parasites in grand fir. Can. Ent. 100: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1968 b. Development of sampling techniques and life tables for the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 100: 1138–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1968 c. Estimation of oviposition by the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 227–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1969. Responses of Abies grandis to attack by Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 101: 1033–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1970. Overwintering populations of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) reduced by extreme cold temperatures. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1194–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. and Ashraf, M.. 1970. Effects of Abies grandis resin on the attack behavior and brood survival of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1229–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. and Pienaar, L. V.. 1973. Simulation of intraspecific competition and survival of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Ent. 2: 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, L. S., Uhrenholdt, B., and Parmeter, J. R. Jr. 1971. Association of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Phoradendron bolleanum subspecies paucifiorum on Abies concolor. Can. Ent. 103: 1697–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, G. T. 1971. Host selection by the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Preliminary field studies. Can. Ent. 103: 1717–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertert, D. 1973. Interaction of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and root-rot pathogens in grand fir in northern Idaho. M.S. Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E. and Shea, K. R.. 1963. White fir defects associated with attacks by the fir engraver. Weyerhaeuser Co. For. Res. Note 54. 8 pp.Google Scholar
Livingston, R. L. 1971. Aspects of the relationship between the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and certain associated fungi. Ph.D. Thesis, Washington State Univ.Google Scholar
Reid, R. W. and Gates, H.. 1970. Effect of temperature and resin on hatch of eggs of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae). Can. Ent. 102: 617–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. W., Whitney, H. S., and Watson, J. A.. 1967. Reaction of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungi. Can. J. Bot. 45: 1115–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. W. and Borden, J. H.. 1965. Observations on mortality factors of the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. econ. Ent. 58: 1162–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, G. R. 1957. The fir engraver, a serious enemy of western true firs. U.S. Dep. Agric. Prod. Res. Rep. 11. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1960. Key factors in population studies. J. Anim. Ecol. 29: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickman, B. E. 1963. Mortality and growth reduction of white fir following defoliation by the Douglas-fir tussock moth. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. PSW-7. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Wickman, B. E., Mason, R. R., and Thompson, C. G.. 1973. Major outbreaks of the Douglasfir tussock moth in Oregon and California. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. gen. tech. Rep. PNW-5. 18 pp.Google Scholar