Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:19:48.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE CEREAL LEAF BEETLE, OULEMA MELANOPUS (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE): A MODEL FOR AGE SPECIFIC MORTALITY1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert G. Helgesen
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Dean L. Haynes
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing

Abstract

The cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus (L.), has rapidly increased its numbers and range since it was discovered in Michigan in 1962. We have shown in this report that intraspecific density-dependent mortality is the major constraint on survivorship. We have attempted to quantify survival within a generation from the egg stage to the adult.Larval mortality varies among populations. Density-dependent mortality, caused by intraspecific competition, accounts for most of the variation of within-generation survival of the cereal leaf beetle in wheat and oats. Mortality in the first instar on oats and the fourth instar on wheat and oats is a linear function of the logarithm of total egg density. Establishment of the first instar on oats appears to become more difficult as density increases because leaf surface disturbance and interference with larger larva increases. Competition for food accounts for the increase in mortality of the fourth instar in both wheat and oats as density increases. Egg survival, survival of the first instar on wheat and in the second, third, and pupal stage in both crops are constants with respect to density. These constants can be expected to change with respect to other environmental parameters however, e.g. host variety, planting date, rainfall, etc.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, F. S. 1957. The effect of density on the birth and death rate. Reprinted from Annual Report from Statens Skadedyrlaboratorium 1954–1955. (Gova't. Pest. Inf. Lab) Springforbi, Denmark. 26 p.Google Scholar
Andrewartha, H. G. and Birch, L. C.. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. The University of Chicago Press. 782 p.Google Scholar
Boggild, O. and Keiding, J.. 1958. Competition on house fly larvae. Experiments involving a DDT-resistant and a susceptible strain. Oikos 9: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, T. R., Ruppel, R. F., and Gomulinski, M. S.. 1965. Natural history of the cereal leaf beetle in Michigan. Mich. St. Univ. agric. Exp. Stn Quart. Bull. 47: 623653.Google Scholar
Chiang, H. C. and Hodson, A. C.. 1950. An analytical study of population growth in Drosophila malanogaster. Ecol. Monogr. 20: 175206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. 1944. On the relationship between temperature and the rate of development of insects at constant temperatures. J. Anim. Ecol. 13: 2638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, J. P. 1961. The analysis of data obtained by regular sampling of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol. 30: 429432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickler, E. The influence of temperature on the survival and development of cereal leaf beetle (Oulema melanopus (L.)) eggs and adults. Cereal Leaf Beetle Project Report (1968). Michigan State University. (Unpublished.)Google Scholar
Embree, D. G. 1965. The population dynamics of the winter moth in Nova Scotia, 1954–1962. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 46, 57 p.Google Scholar
Frank, P. W. 1952. A laboratory study of intraspecies and interspecies competition in Daphnia pulicaria (Forbes) and Simocepkalus vetulus O. F. Mulley. Physiol. Zool. 25: 178204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiritani, K. and Nakasuji, F.. 1967. Estimation of the stage-specific survival rate in the insect population with overlapping stages. Res. Pop. Ecol. 9: 143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, D. L. and Apple, J. W.. 1967. Mortality of the cereal leaf beetle within pupal cells. Proc. North Central Br., ent. Soc. Am. 22: 9697.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators, with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 33: 225294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1960. Sampling insect populations. A. Rev. Ent. 5: 243264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1933. The balance of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2: 132178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2: 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W. and Waloff, N.. 1954. Studies on the biology and population dynamics of British grasshoppers. Anti-Locust Bull. 17: 1182.Google Scholar
Richards, O. W., Waloff, N., and Spadbury, J. P.. 1960. The measurement of mortality in an insect population in which recruitment and mortality widely overlap. Oikos 11: 306310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shade, R. E., Hansen, H. L., and Wilson, M. C.. 1970. A partial life table of the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus, in northern Indiana. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 5259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods: with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Methuen, London. 391 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1939. Biological control and the theories of interactions of populations. Parasitology 31: 299388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1950. Competition for food and allied phenomena in sheep blow-fly populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) (London) 234: 77174.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1965. The principles of insect physiology, 6th ed. Methuen, London. 741 p.Google Scholar
Yun, Y. M. 1967. Effects of some physical and biological factors on the reproduction, development, survival and behavior of the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus (L.) under laboratory conditions. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Mich. State Univ. 153 p. (Diss. Abst. 28: 5068-B.)Google Scholar