Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:13:45.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

POPULATION CHANGE IN AN OUTBREAK OF THE DOUGLAS-FIR TUSSOCK MOTH, ORGYIA PSEUDOTSUGATA (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE), IN CENTRAL ARIZONA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Richard R. Mason
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, Oregon

Abstract

Changes in population density were evaluated over an outbreak cycle of the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Growth rate of populations was independent of larval density in the first year, but thereafter became a reciprocal function of density, terminated by complete population collapse at the end of the third year. Through correlation analyses, it was found that density of small larvae accounted for a large proportion of the change in population density between years. This suggests that the local infestations developed largely from resident populations of at least 2 years and not from spread of early instar larvae during the outbreak.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, J. F. 1973. Some problems of testing for density-dependence in animal populations. Oecologia 13: 183190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlsten, D. L. and Thomas, G. M.. 1969 A nucleopolyhedrosis virus in populations of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Hemerocampa pseudotsugata, in California. J. invert. Path. 13: 264271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhardt, L. L. 1970. Correlation, regression and density dependence. Ecology 51: 306310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maelzer, D. A. 1970. The regression of log Nn+1 on log Nn as a test of density dependence: an exercise with computer-constructed density-independent populations. Ecology 51: 810822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. R. 1969. Sequential sampling of Douglas-fir tussock moth populations. Forest Res. Note Pacif. NW. Forest Exp. Stn, PNW-102.Google Scholar
Mason, R. R. 1970. Development of sampling methods for the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Hemerocampa pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can. Ent. 102: 836845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. R. and Thompson, C. G.. 1971. Collapse of an outbreak of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Hemerocampa pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Forest Res. Note Pacif. NW. Forest Exp. Stn, PNW-139.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. 1964. Density dependence in population fluctuations. Can. Ent. 96: 11471148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickman, B. E. 1963. Mortality and growth reduction of white fir following defoliation by the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Forest Res. Pap. Pacif. SW. Forest Exp. Stn, PSW-7.Google Scholar
Wickman, B. E., Mason, R. R., and Thompson, C. G.. 1973. Major outbreaks of the Douglas-fir tussock moth in Oregon and California. Gen. Tech. Rep. Pacif. NW. Forest Exp. Stn, PNW-5.Google Scholar