Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:55:56.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PHYSICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING EUXOA SPECIES ABUNDANCE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. F. Hardwick
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
L. P. Lefkovitch
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

In an attempt to evaluate the importance of physical and biotic factors affecting the distribution of species of the cutworm genus Euxoa, a multivariate regression analysis, as based on a light-trapping survey in western North America, has been conducted. The possible contributory factors have been grouped into four major categories relating to geography, habitat, period of flight, and sample size. Sample size is a composite value reflecting both suitability of habitat and suitability of weather conditions at the time the sample was taken. Geographic factors considered were latitude, altitude, and longitude; habitat factors were mean annual temperature, mean July temperature, mean January temperature, mean annual rainfall and plantform; factors relating to period of flight were calendar date, mean temperature on date of sample, photoperiod, and the phenological date. Except for photoperiod, the variables listed were considered in a quadratic as well as a natural function in the regression analysis. With the number of species of Euxoa as the dependent variable and the factors listed above as the independent variables a total reduction of 76.0% in the residual variance was obtained. When only four variables, sample size, mean annual temperature, mean annual rainfall, and phenological date were employed in a similar regression analysis, however, a reduction of 68.7% in the residual variance was obtained. On the basis of present evidence, it appears that temperature and rainfall are primary factors governing the abundance of species of Euxoa in a given habitat.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cook, W. C. 1924. The distribution of the pale western cutworm, Porosagrotis orthogonia Morr.: A study in physical ecology. Ecology 5: 6069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, W. C. 1926. Some weather relations of the pale western cutworm (Porosagrotis orthogonia Morr.). A preliminary study. Ecology 7: 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, W. C. 1930. Field studies of the pale western cutworm (Porosagrotis orthogonia (Morr.)). Bull. Montana agric. Exp. Stn. No. 225.Google Scholar
Dudal, R. 1968. Definitions of soil units for the soil map of the world. FAO World Soil Resources Rep. 33.Google Scholar
Eckert, W. J. and Clemence, G. M. (compilers). 1946. Tables of sunrise, sunset, and twilight. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B.. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. anim. Ecol. 12: 4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, D. F. 1971. The “phenological date” as an indicator of the flight period of noctuid moths. Can. Ent. 103: 12071216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A.. 1961. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A.. 1966. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 3. London.Google Scholar
Seamans, H. L. 1923. Forecasting outbreaks of the pale western cutworm in Alberta. Can. Ent. 55: 5153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar