Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:24:42.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PERIODICITY IN THE RESPONSIVENESS OF MALE SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) TO SYNTHETIC SEX ATTRACTANT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. W. Thomas
A. W. Thomas
Affiliation:
Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5P7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Past experiments concerned with the elucidation of the daily activity pattern of male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), have used the response of males to virgin females as the criterion of activity. Males showed a peak response just after sunset and little activity in the early afternoon (Greenbank 1963; Sanders 1971a). Difficulty arises in interpreting such data in terms of male activity patterns. It is obvious that males are active after sunset; however, there is no way of knowing whether the reduced activity in the early afternoon is a result of changing response thresholds by the males or whether it is a result of the females releasing insufficient, if any, pheromone (see Morse et al. 1982). After the identification of the components of the female sex pheromone (Sanders and Weatherston 1976) a synthetic sex attractant was developed and the inherent daily activity pattern of male spruce budworm could be determined.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 6 , June 1983 , pp. 713 - 714
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Green, G. W. and Henson, W. R.. 1953. A new type of coprometer for laboratory and field use. Can. Ent. 85: 227–230.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. The analysis of moth survival and dispersal in the unsprayed area: Normal flight activity. In Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The Dynamics of Epidemic Spruce Budworm Populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. M., Jennings, D. T., and Houseweart, M. W.. 1982. A large-capacity pheromone trap for spruce budworm moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 114: 461–463.Google Scholar
Morse, D., Szittner, R., Grant, G. G., and Meighen, E. A.. 1982. Rate of pheromone release by individual spruce budworm moths. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 863–886.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971 a. Daily activity patterns and sex pheromone specificity as sexual isolating mechanisms in two species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971 b. Laboratory bioassay of the sex pheromone of the female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 631–637.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1981. Release rates and attraction of PVC lures containing synthetic sex attractant of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 113: 103–111.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Weatherston, J.. 1976. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): optimal blend of trans- and cis-11-tetradecenal. Can. Ent. 108: 1285–1290.Google Scholar