Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T01:57:26.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PATHOGENICITY OF A GRANULOVIRUS TOWARDS CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

André J. Forté
Affiliation:
INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Québec, Canada H7V 1B7
Claude Guertin*
Affiliation:
INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Québec, Canada H7V 1B7
Jean Cabana
Affiliation:
Ministère des ressources naturelles, Direction de la recherche forestière, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1P 3W8
*
1Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Extract

The spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) is the most damaging insect of the balsam fir Abies balsema (L.) Mill. (Pinaceae) and the white spruce Picea glauca (Moench) Voss (Pinaceae) throughout eastern North America. In outbreak conditions, close to 100% tree mortality can occur in untreated mature fir stands (MacLean 1980). Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Bacillaceae) is currently used to reduce spruce budworm damage (Van Frankenhuyzen and Payne 1993). Other possible biological control agents, such as baculoviruses, are also investigated to complement the use of B. thuringiensis. Baculoviruses are advantageous because they occur naturally in several insect species and are generally host specific (Federici 1993).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J.R., McClintock, T. 1991. Baculoviridae. Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. Part 1. Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses of insects. pp. 87204in Adams, J.R., Bonami, J.R. (Eds.), Atlas of invertebrate viruses. Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Bird, F.T. 1959. Polyhedrosis and granulosis causing single and double infections in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens. Journal of Insect Pathology 1: 406–30Google Scholar
Comptois, B. 1988. Notions d'entomologie forestière. Mont-Royal: Modulo ÉditeurGoogle Scholar
Ebling, P.M., Kaupp, W.J. 1997. Pathogenicity of a nuclear polyhedrosis virus to forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). The Canadian Entomologist 129: 195–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federici, B.A. 1993. Viral pathobiology in relation to insect control. pp. 81100in Beckage, N.E., Thompson, S.N., Federici, B.A. (Eds.), Parasites and pathogens of insects. Vol. 2. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Guertin, C., Cabana, J. 1998. Granulovirus of spruce budworm as biological insecticide. p. 96in Joint Meeting of the Entomological Society of Canada and the Entomological Society of Quebec: Program and Abstracts. Saint-Foy: Minister of Public Works and Government Services CanadaGoogle Scholar
Kaupp, W.J., Ebling, P.M. 1990. Response of third-, fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-instar spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), larvae to nuclear polyhedrosis virus. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 1037–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeOra Software. 1994. POLO-PC A User's Guide to Probit and Logit Analysis. Berkley; LeOra SoftwareGoogle Scholar
MacLean, D.A. 1980. Vulnerability of fir-spruce stands during uncontrolled spruce budworm outbreaks: a review and discussion. Forest Chronicles 56: 213–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 97: 5862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, G.J. 1991. Purification of invertebrate viruses. pp. 3140in Adams, J.R., Bonami, J.R. (Eds.), Atlas of invertebrate viruses. Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Van Frankenhuyzen, K., Payne, N.J. 1993. Theoretical optimisation of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) for control of the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): estimates of lethal and sublethal dose requirements, product potency, and effective droplet sizes. The Canadian Entomologist 125: 473–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar