Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:48:33.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PARASITISM BY SCELIO CALOPTENI RILEY (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE) IN EGGS OF THE TWO DOMINANT MELANOPLINE SPECIES (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) IN SASKATCHEWAN1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M.K. Mukerji
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 107 Science Crescent, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2

Abstract

Parasitism by Scelio calopteni Riley in eggs of Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) and M. sanguinipes (Fabr.) in Saskatchewan during 1967–1980 was highly aggregated. There was no evidence of any numerical response of the parasites to adult grasshopper density and, furthermore, change in grasshopper population density was independent of percentage parasitism. Thus, it is concluded that parasitism by S. calopteni does not play a significant role in the population dynamics of the two grasshopper species. The relationship between parasitism and wetness in August was highly significant in both grasshopper species and showed that percentage parasitism increased, but at a decreasing rate, up to a certain wetness and levelled off thereafter.

Résumé

Le parasitisme exercé par Scelio calopteni sur les oeufs de Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) et de M. sanguinipes (Fabr.) en Saskatchewan de 1967 à 1980 est fortement groupé. Il n’existe aucune preuve de réaction numérique des parasites à la densité de population des criquets adultes et, bien plus, la variation de densité de population des criquets est indépendante du taux de parasitisme. L’auteur conclut donc que le parasitisme exercé par S. calopteni ne joue pas un rôle important dans la dynamique des populations des deux espèces de criquets. Le rapport entre le parasitisme et le temps pluvieux en août est très significatif sur les deux espèces de criquets et révèle que le taux de parasitisme augmente, mais à un rythme décroissant, jusqu’à un certain degré d’humidité, pour ensuite plafonner.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Criddle, N. 1921. Some phases of the present locust outbreak in Manitoba. Annu. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 51 (1920): 1923.Google Scholar
Gage, S.H., Mukerji, M.K., and Randall, R.L.. 1976. A predictive model for seasonal occurrence of three grasshopper species in Saskatchewan (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Can. Ent. 108: 245253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H.W. 1948. Parasitism of grasshopper eggs. In Third Report of committee on grasshopper research appointed by the A.A.E.E., Part III. Can. Dep. Agric. Div. Ent. Processed Publ. 26: 12.Google Scholar
Noble, N.S. 1938. The egg parasite of the plague grasshopper. N.S. Wales Agric. Gaz. 49: 143146.Google Scholar
Pickford, R. 1964. Life history and behavior of Scelio calopteni Riley (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a parasite of grasshopper eggs. Can. Ent. 96: 11671172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L.G. 1953. Observations on internal parasites (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) of eggs of pest grasshopper species in the Prairie Provinces in Canada. Can. Ent. 85: 255260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L.G., and Shklov, N.. 1956. Observation on the distribution of grasshopper egg pods in western Canadian stubble fields. Can. Ent. 88: 110117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature (Lond.) 189: 732735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar