Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:18:21.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oviposition deterrence to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): a source of resistance for durum wheat (Gramineae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R.J. Lamb*
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
M.A.H. Smith
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
I.L. Wise
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
P. Clarke
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
J. Clarke
Affiliation:
Semi-Arid Prairie Agriculture Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 1030, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada S9H 3X2
*
2 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Over 250 durum wheats, Triticum durum Desf., and close relatives were screened for resistance to the wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin). Less than 2% showed consistently reduced egg and larval densities in field and laboratory trials. Two related accessions named ’Kahla’ had stable, low larval infestation levels, which were about 30% of those in commercial durum wheat cultivars. No antibiosis was detected in durum wheats. The reduction in infestation by larvae was associated with a similar reduction in oviposition. The resistance reduced egg densities by 80% or more in choice and no-choice laboratory tests and by about 70% in the field. Egg group size was not affected, and therefore reduced oviposition must have resulted from the number of egg groups deposited by females. The resistance was not associated with any of 12 morphological traits that were quantified for spikes. ’Kahla’ is the first durum wheat identified to have resistance against the wheat midge.

Résumé

La résistance à la Cécidomyiie du blé, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin), a été évaluée chez plus de 250 blés durs, Triticum durum Desf., et chez d’autres plantes fortement apparentées. La densité des oeufs et des larves n’a diminué de façon systématique que chez moins de 2% des plantes, en nature et en laboratoire. Deux accessions apparentées connues sous l’appellation de « Kahla » se sont révélées avoir des taux d’infestation de larves faibles et stables, équivalant à environ 30% des taux d’infestation des cultivars de blé dur commercial. Aucune antibiose n’a été observée chez les blés durs. La réduction de l’infestation de larves était associée à une réduction correspondante de la ponte. La résistance a réduit la densité des oeufs de 80% ou plus au cours de tests de choix et de tests sans choix en laboratoire et d’environ 70% en nature. Le nombre d’oeufs dans les groupes ne variait pas et on peut donc attribuer la réduction de la ponte à une réduction du nombre de masses d’oeufs pondues par les femelles. Il n’y avait pas de corrélation entre la résistance et 12 caractéristiques morphologiques mesurées sur les épis. Le « Kahla » est le premier blé dur à s’avérer résistant à la Cécidomyiie du blé.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 1798 of the Cereal Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

References

Canadian Grain Commission. 1998. Official Grain Grading Guide, Section 4, pp 1428. Winnipeg: Canadian Grain CommissionGoogle Scholar
Ding, H., Guo, Y. 1993. Studies on the relationship between the morphology of the wheat ear and resistance to wheat midge. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 20: 309–13Google Scholar
Ding, H., Lamb, R.J. 1999. Oviposition and larval establishment of Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on wheat (Gramineae) at different growth stages. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 475–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, H., Lamb, R.J.. Ames, N. 2000. Inducible production of phenolic acids in wheat and antibiotic resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 969–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J., Wise, I.L., Olfert, O.O., Gavloski, J., Barker, P.S. 1999. Distribution and seasonal abundance of Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 387–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J., McKenzie, R.I.H., Wise, I.L., Barker, P.S., Smith, M.A.H., Olfert, O.O. 2000 a. Resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist 132: 591605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J., Tucker, J.R., Wise, I.L., Smith, M.A.H. 2000 b. Trophic interaction between Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and spring wheat: implications for yield and seed quality. The Canadian Entomologist 132: 607–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivnick, K.A., Labbé, E. 1993. Daily patterns of activity of females of the orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist 125: 725–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT® user's guide, version 6, 4th edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.A.H., Lamb, R.J. 2001. Factors influencing oviposition by Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on wheat spikes (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist 133: 533–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, I.L., Lamb, R.J., Smith, M.A.H. 2001. Domestication of wheats (Gramineae) and their susceptibility to herbivory by Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist 133: 255–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A.T., Doane, J.F. 1987. Wheat midge infestation of spring cereals in northeastern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 67: 117–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., Konzak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar