Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:39:51.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE STATUS OF SEVEN NEARCTIC SPECIES CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE GENUS LYGUS HAHN (HETEROPTERA: MIRIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Leonard A. Kelton
Leonard A. Kelton
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seven species originally described in the genus Lygus Hahn are here removed from that genus. The new combinations are: Lygus fortinensis Distant is transferred to Ellenia Reuter, Lygus hospitus Distant and Lygus pellitus Distant are transferred to Dagbertus Distant, Lygus lanuginosus Distant is transferred to Polymerus Hahn, Lygus vicarius Reuter is transferred to Proba Distant, Lygus repletus Heidemann is transferred to Dichrooscytus Fieber, and Lygus irroratus Blatchley is transferred to Lygocoris Reuter. Dagbertus olivaceus Reuter is a new synonym of hospitus.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 4 , April 1974 , pp. 377 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akingbohungbe, A. 1972. Miridae of Wisconsin (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Univ. Wisc. Coll. Agric. Life Sciences, R.2396.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S. 1926. Heteroptera or true bugs of eastern North America with especial reference to the faunas of Indiana and Florida. Nature Publ., Indianapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1948. Mirideos neotropicais, 30. Gêneros Ellenia Reuter, Eurychilopterella Reuter, e Rhinocloa Reuter, com descriçoes de espécies novas (Hemiptera). Bol. Mus. nac. Zool. 85: 1–13.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1959. Catalogue of the Miridae of the World. Arch. Mus. nac. Rio de J. 48. 384 pp.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1884–1893. Insecta. Rhynchota. Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Biologia cent-am. I. 462 pp.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1904. Rhynchotal notes. 21. Heteroptera, fam. Capsidae (Part 2). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 13: 203.Google Scholar
Froeschner, R. C. 1949. Contributions to a synopsis of the Hemiptera of Missouri. IV. Am. Midl. Nat. 42: 123–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, C. W. 1831. Die Wanzenartigen Insecten. Nurnberg.Google Scholar
Heidemann, O. 1892. Note on the food-plants of some Capsidae from the vicinity of Washington, D.C. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 11: 224–226.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1963. Bull. zool. Nomencl. 20: 270–271.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1972. Bull. zool. Nomencl. 29: 185–186.Google Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1972. Species of Dichrooscytus found in Canada, with descriptions of four new species (Heteroptera: Miridae). Can. Ent. 104: 1033–1049.Google Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1974 a. Knightomiris new genus, for Lygus distinctus Knight (Heteroptera: Miridae). Can. Ent. 105: 1417–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1974 b. Two new species of Lygus from North America, and a note on the status of Lygus abroniae Van Duzee (Heteroptera: Miridae). Can. Ent. 105: 1545–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerzhner, I. M. 1972. New and little-known Heteroptera from the Far East of the USSR. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR 52: 276–295.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1918. Interesting new species of Miridae from the United States with a note on Orthocephalus mutabilis (Fallén) (Hemip. Miridae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 13: 111–116.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1923. The Miridae (or Capsidae) of Connecticut. In Britton, W., The Hemiptera, or sucking insects, of Connecticut. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv., No. 34.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1928. Family Miridae. In Leonard, M.D., A list of the insects of New York. Bull. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn 101: 110–134.Google Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1941. The plant bugs, or Miridae of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. nat. Hist. Surv., No. 22.Google Scholar
Moore, G. A. 1944. A list of Hemiptera taken at Hudson Heights, Quebec. Can. Ent. 76: 40–44.Google Scholar
Moore, G. A. 1950. Liste des Hemiptères de la Province de Québec. Naturaliste Can. 77: 1–49.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1875. Revisio critica Capsinarum, praecipue Scandenaviae et Fennicae. Akad. Afhandl. Helsingfors., Vol. I, 101 pp.; Vol. II, 190 pp.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1907. Capsinae mexicanae. Ann. nat. Hofmus. 22: 168.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1906. Capsidae novae in insula Jamaica. Öfvers. Finska vet-Soc. Förh. 49: 6.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1910. Neue Beiträge zur Phylogenie und systematik der Miriden. Acta Soc. Sci. fenn. 37: 168.Google Scholar
Watson, S. A. 1928. The Miridae of Ohio. Bull. Ohio St. Univ., No. 33.Google Scholar
Wray, D. C. 1950. Insects of North Carolina. Dep. Agric., Div. Ent., Raleigh, N.C.Google Scholar