Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:31:19.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the misidentification of chalcid (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) parasitoids of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Gary A.P. Gibson ,
Hannes Baur ,
Bryan Ulmer ,
Lloyd Dosdall  and
Franck Muller
Gary A.P. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Biodiversity and Integrated Pest Management, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Hannes Baur
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrates, Naturhistorisches Museum, Bernstrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland
Bryan Ulmer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4–10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Lloyd Dosdall
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4–10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Franck Muller
Affiliation:
CABI Bioscience Centre, Rue des Grillons, Delémont, Switzerland
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous identifications in North America of Trichomalus perfectus (Walker, 1835) and Mesopolobus morys (Walker, 1848) (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae), the principal chalcid parasitoids of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus Marsham, 1802) in Europe, are shown to be misidentifications of Trichomalus lucidus (Walker, 1835) and Mesopolobus (Xenocrepis) moryoidessp. nov., respectively. Necremnus duplicatus Gahan, 1941 (Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae) is synonymized formally under Necremnus tidius (Walker, 1839) syn. nov., confirming a previous, tentative synonymy. Both sexes of N. tidius, M. moryoides, and T. lucidus are illustrated and compared with those of similar species using macrophotography and scanning electron microphotography. Hypotheses are offered to explain why the principal chalcid parasitoids of the cabbage seedpod weevil differ between North America and Europe and how the three treated species came to be in North America.

Résumé

Les insectes connus jusqu'ici en Amérique du Nord comme Trichomalus perfectus (Walker, 1835) et Mesopolobus morys (Walker, 1848) (Chalidoidea: Pteromalidae), les principaux chalcidiens parasitoïdes du charaçon de la graine de chou (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus Marsham, 1802) en Europe, sont mal identifiés; il s'agit, en fait, respectivement de Trichomalus lucidus (Walker, 1835) et de Mesopolobus (Xenocrepis) moryoidessp. nov.Necremnus duplicatus Gahan, 1941 (Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae) devient formellement un synonyme plus récent de Necremnus tidius (Walker, 1839) syn. nov., confirmant ainsi une synonymie préliminaire antérieure. Des macrophotographies et des microphotographies au microscope électronique à balayage viennent illustrer les deux sexes de N. tidius, de M. moryoides et de T. lucidus et permettent des comparaisons avec les espèces similaires. Des hypothèses cherchent à expliquer pourquoi les chalcidiens parasitoïdes du charançon de la graine de chou sont différents en Amérique du Nord et en Europe et comment les trois espèces en question se sont retrouvées en Amérique du Nord.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 137 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 381 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Wm. W. 1936. Notes on a European weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk., recently found in the state of Washington. The Canadian Entomologist, 68: 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, A.B. 1949. The Canadian Insect Pest Review, 27: 268–288.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1959. A study of central European Eulophidae. I. Eulophinae (Hymenoptera). Sborník Entomologického Oddeleni Národního Musea v Praze, 33: 117–170.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1993. New taxa of North American Pteromalidae and Tetracampidae (Hymenoptera), with notes. Journal of Natural History, 27: 1239–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouček, Z., and Askew, R.R. 1968. Index of entomophagous insects. Palearctic Eulophidae (excl. Tetrastichinae). (Hym. Chalcidoidea). Le François, Paris.Google Scholar
Bouçek, Z., and Heydon, S.L. 1997. Chapter 17. Pteromalidae. In Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Edited by Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., and Woolley, J.B.. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 541–692.Google Scholar
Bouçek, Z., and Rasplus, J.-Y. 1991. Illustrated key to West-Palaearctic genera of Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Breakey, E.P., Webster, R.L., and Carlson, E.C. 1944. The cabbage seed pod weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis, in western Washington. Western Washington Experiment Station. Entomology. Bulletin of the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, 455: 118–119.Google Scholar
Brodeur, J., Leclerc, L.-A., Fournier, M., and Roy, M. 2001. Cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): new pest of canola in northeastern North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 709–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buntin, G.D. 1998. Cabbage seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis, Paykull) management by trap cropping and its effect on parasitism by Trichomalus perfectus (Walker) in oilseed rape. Crop Protection, 17: 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buntin, G.D., McCaffrey, J.P., Raymer, P.L., and Romero, J. 1995. Quality and germination of rapeseed and canola seed damaged by adult cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Paykull) [Coleoptera: Curculionidae]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 75: 539–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979. Family Pteromalidae. In Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Vol. I. Edited by Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D.. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, District of Columbia. pp. 768–835.Google Scholar
Cárcamo, H.A., Dosdall, L., Dolinski, M., Olfert, O., and Byers, J.R. 2001. The cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) — areview. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 98: 201–210.Google Scholar
Carlson, E.C., Lange, W.H. Jr., and Sclaroni, R.H. 1950. Brussels sprouts seed loss in California caused by the cabbage seedpod weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology, 43: 389–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, E.C., Lange, W.H. Jr., and Sclaroni, R.H. 1951. Distribution and control of the cabbage seedpod weevil in California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 44: 958–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonnelli, E. 1998. Systematic and synonymic notes on Ceutorhynchinae, with lectotype and neotype designations, and descriptions of three new genera (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Fragmenta Entomologica, 30: 105–175.Google Scholar
Cory, E.N., and Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1960. Arthur Burton Gahan 1880–1960. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 62: 198–204.Google Scholar
Crowell, H.H. 1952. Cabbage seedpod weevil control with Parathion. Journal of Economic Entomology, 45: 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalla Torre, K.W. von. 1898. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. V. Chalcididae et Proctotrupidae. Lepzig.Google Scholar
Delucchi, V., and Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1956. La révision du genre Trichomalus Thomson (1878) (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae). Beiträge zur Entomologie, 6: 543–576.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M., Moisey, D., Cárcamo, H., and Dunn, R. 2001. Cabbage seedpod weevil factsheet. Agdex 622–21, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Doucette, C.F. 1948. Field parasitization and larval mortality of the cabbage seedpod weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology, 41: 765–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucette, C.F. 1944. The cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Payk). Western Washington Experiment Station. Entomology. Bulletin of the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, 455: 123–125.Google Scholar
Förster, A. 1841. Beiträge zur monographie der Pteromalinen Nees 1 Heft. Aachen.Google Scholar
Frankton, C., and Mulligan, G.A. 1971. Weeds of Canada. Publication 948, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1941. A revision of the parasitic wasps of the genus Necremnus Thomson (Eulophidae; Hymenoptera). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 31: 196–203.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1995. Parasitic wasps of the subfamily Eupelminae: classification and revision of world genera (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eupelmidae). Memoirs on Entomology International, 5: 1–421.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1997. Chapter 2. Morphology and terminology. In Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Edited by Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., and Woolley, J.B.. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 16–44.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 2003. Phylogenetics and classification of Cleonyminae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae). Memoirs on Entomology International, 16: 1–339.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P., and Baur, H. 2005. Mesopolobus trasullus (Walker, 1839), a valid species and senior synonym of Mesopolobus roseni Graham, 1984. Entomologist's Gazette, 56: 129–132.Google Scholar
Gomez, J.M., and Zamora, R. 1994. Top-down effects in a tritrophic system: parasitoids enhance plant fitness. Ecology, 75: 1023–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goureau, C.C. 1851. Mémoire pour servir à l'histoire des Diptères don't les larves minent les feuilles des plantes et à celle de leurs parasites. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 9(2): 131–176, 3 plates.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1956. A revision of the Walker types of Pteromalidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Part 2 (including descriptions of new species). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 92: 246–263.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1957. A revision of the Walker types of Pteromalidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Part 3 (including descriptions of new species). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 93: 217–236.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1959. Keys to the British genera and species of Elachertinae, Eulophinae, Entedontinae, and Euderinae (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Transactions of the Society for British Entomology, 13: 169–204.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1963. Additions and corrections to the British list of Eulophidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Transactions of the Society for British Entomology, 15(9): 167–275.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1969. The Pteromalidae of north-western Europe (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 16(Suppl.): 1–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1984. New Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) mainly from France, including several species of Eurytoma and Pteromalus associated with Euphorbia. Journal of Natural History, 18: 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1991. Type material in the University Museum, Oxford, of one Kirby and five Walker species of Eulophidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea) with new synonymy and designation of lectotypes. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 127: 7–9.Google Scholar
Hanson, A.J., Carlson, E.C., Breakey, E.P., and Webster, R.L. 1948. Biology of the cabbage seedpod weevil in northwestern Washington. State College of Washington Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, 498: 1–15.Google Scholar
Harmon, B.L., and McCaffrey, J.P. 1997. Parasitism of adult Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by Microctonus melanopus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in northern Idaho and eastern Washington. Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 14: 55–59.Google Scholar
Heymons, R. 1921. Mitteilungen über den Rapsrüssler, Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk. und seinen Parasiten, Trichomalus fasciatus Thoms. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 8: 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klander, B. 2001. Die Rüsselkäfer der Unterfamillie Ceutorhynchinae und deren Parasitoide auf Winterraps und begleitenden Unkräutern in Schleswig-Holstein. M.Sc. thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, U., Toepfer, S., Grossrieder, M., White, H., Klander, B., Reimer, L. et al. 2000. Summary report — progress in 2000. Agricultural pest research. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, Delémont, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, U., Toepfer, S., Grossrieder, M., Zhang, F., Hunt, E., Hemachandra, K.S. et al. 2001. Summary report — progress in 2001. Agricultural pest research. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, Delémont, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, U., Dosdall, L.M., and Mason, P.G. 2002. 11. Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham), cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). In Biological control programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. Edited by Mason, P.G. and Huber, J. T.. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom. pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
Laborius, A. 1972. Untersuchungen über die Parasitierung des Kohlschotenrüsslers (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.) und der Kohlschotengallmücke (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.) in Schleswig-Holstein. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 72: 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, P.G., Baute, T., Olfert, O., and Roy, M. 2004 (2003). Cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Ontario and Quebec. Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 134: 107–113.Google Scholar
McKenna, D. 1992. Study of the effects of insecticide management on the seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.) and its parasites. M.Sc. thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar
McLeod, J.H. 1951. Biological control investigations in British Columbia. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 47: 27–36.Google Scholar
McLeod, J.H. 1953. Notes on the cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Payk.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and its parasites. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 49: 11–18.Google Scholar
McLeod, J.H. 1962. Part I. Biological control of pests of crops, fruit trees, ornamentals and weeds in Canada up to 1959. In A review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada. Technical Communication No. 2, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Trinidad. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal. pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Miczulski, B. 1968. Community studies on Hymenoptera found on Brassica napus L. Part VI. Chalcidoidea. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 38: 341–385. [Polish with English summary.]Google Scholar
Muller, F., Gariepy, T.D., and Kuhlmann, U. 2003. Biological control of cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus. Annual report 2002–2003. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, Delémont, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Muller, F., Cuenot, E., and Kuhlmann, U. 2004. Cabbage seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus Marsham). Annual report 2003–2004. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre, Delémont, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Murchie, A.K., and Williams, I.H. 1998. A bibliography of the parasitoids of the cabbage seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.). IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 21(5): 163–169.Google Scholar
Nasredlin, N. 1973. A study of the weevil complex on mustard with special reference to the seedpod weevil. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar
Noyes, J.S. 2002. Interactive catalogue of world Chalcidoidea. 2nd ed. [CD-ROM]. Taxapad, Vancouver, British Columbia, and The Natural History Museum, London.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta; Hymenoptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 30(Suppl.): 1–1092.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.B., Bousfield, W.E., Johanningmeier, C.W., Parsons, G.B., Schmitz, R.F., and Theroux, L.J. 1977. Releases of recently imported larch casebearer parasites for biological control in the western United States, including relocations of Agathis pumila. United States Forest Service Research Note PNW-290.Google Scholar
Schauff, M.E., LaSalle, J., and Coote, L.D. 1997. Chapter 10. Eulophidae. In Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Edited by Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., and Woolley, J.B.. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 327–429.Google Scholar
Spaic, I. 1972. Prilog poznavanjii parazita jelinog iglivcara Argyresthia fundella F.R. Acta Entomologica Jugoslavica, 8: 99–103.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1878. Hymenoptera Scandinaviae 5. Pteromalus (Svederus) continuatio. Lund.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1834. Monographia Chalciditum. Entomological Magazine, 2: 340–369.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1835. Monographia Chalciditum. Entomological Magazine, 2: 476–502.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1836. Monographia Chalciditum. Entomological Magazine, 3: 465–496.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1839. Monographia Chalciditum 1. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1848. List of the specimens of Hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. E. Newman, London.Google Scholar
Walz, A.J. 1957. Observations on the biologies of some hymenopterous parasites of the cabbage seedpod weevil in northern Idaho. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 50: 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, S.I., Francis, A., and Mulligan, G.A. 2004. Brassicaceae of Canada [online]. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Available from http://www.scib.gc.ca/spp_pages/brass/index_e.php [accessed August 2004].Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1833. Descriptions of several new British forms amongst the parasitic hymenopterous insects. Philosophical Magazine, 3(3): 342–344.Google Scholar
Williams, I.H. 2003. Parasitoids of cabbage seed weevil. In Biocontrol of oilseed rape pests. Edited by Alford, D.V.. Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar