Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:47:51.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THE FACE FLY, MUSCA AUTUMNALIS (DIPTERA: MUSCIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. J. Teskey
H. J. Teskey
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, is continuously present in the field at Guelph, Ont., from April to late October, with peak populations occurring near 1 August. The flies enter buildings only to hibernate, the females doing so in an unfertilized, nulliparous condition. The flies feed only during the daylight hours and primarily on cattle and horses. Infestations on these hosts arc subject to wide daily and hourly variation dependent on temperature, light, precipitation, wind, and behavior of the host.Mating normally occurs as a result of males waiting at particular stations in the pasture to apprehend females flying past. Experiments and observations on a laboratory colony of face flies has disclosed other facets of their sexual behavior.Provided with a suitable proteinaceous diet the face fly can produce an average of 26 eggs per ovarial cycle and a probable maximum of near 230 eggs in a lifetime. Oviposition and (or) successful development will apparently occur only in bovine feces having a certain consistency. Face flies are among the first of the coprophagous insects to reach a dropping; arriving normally within 5 to 10 minutes of its deposition. The dropping remains suitable for oviposition for up to about 3 hours, depending on the rate of drying of its surface.Under normal summer temperature conditions eggs hatched within about 24 hours. The young larvae were initially restricted to the surface layers of the dropping by their respiratory requirements but by the end of the normal 5 to 7 day development period the larvae occupied the entire dropping. Mature third stage larvae pupated in the soil surrounding the dropping.Two hymenopterous pupal parasites Aphaereta pallipes (Say) and Xylaphora sp. accounted for approximately 10% mortality. Face fly adults were preyed upon by the staphylinid beetle Ontholestes cingulatus Gravelle, and the common dung fly, Scatophaga stercoraria (L.).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 6 , June 1969 , pp. 561 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Service. 1967. Distribution of face fly, Musca autumnalis. Co-op. Econ. Ins. Rept. 17. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Barnhart, C. S., and Chadwick, L. E.. 1953. A “fly factor” in attractant studies. Science, N.Y. 117: 104–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, O. L., and Wingo, C. W.. 1963. Investigations of the face fly in Missouri. J. econ. Ent. 56: 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blickle, R. L. 1961. Parasites of the face fly, Musca autumnalis, in New Hampshire. J. econ. Ent. 54: 802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creelman, I. S. (ed.). 1966. Face fly. Can. Insect Pest Rev. 44: 22.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. 1940. Report on terminology in malaria. Bull. Hlth Org. 9: 131–246.Google Scholar
Derbeneva-Ukhova, V. P. 1942. On the development of ovaries and on the imaginal nutrition in dung flies (in Russian). Med. Parasit. Moscow 11: 85–97.Google Scholar
Dorsey, C. K. 1966. Face fly control experiments on quarter horses – 1962–64. J. econ. Ent. 59: 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, O. 1942. Biological and ecological investigations on flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement. Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren 105: 141–393.Google Scholar
Hansens, E. J., and Valiela, I.. 1967. Activity of the face fly in New Jersey. J. econ. Ent. 60: 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, B. C. 1950. Techniques of observing the weather. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Killough, R. A., et al. 1965. Face fly dispersal, nocturnal resting places, and activity during sunset as observed in 1963. J. econ. Ent. 58: 711–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killough, R. A., and McClellan, E. S.. 1965. Face fly oviposition studies. J. econ. Ent. 58: 716–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E. 1960. The structure and function of the respiratory horns of the eggs of some flies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 243: 45–73.Google Scholar
Kobayaski, H. 1919. Flies in Korea. Report I (in Korean). J. Chosen med. Soc. No. 24 (Rev. appl. Ent (B) 7: 142 (1919)).Google Scholar
Matthysse, J. G. 1962. The face fly, Musca autumnalis DeGeer on livestock, habits of the fly as related to dairy farming, successes and failures in control efforts. Proc. chem. Spec. Mfrs Ass., 48th Ann. Meet. 1961, New York.Google Scholar
Mer, G. G. 1936. Experimental study on the development of the ovary in Anopheles Edw. (Dept. Culic). Bull. ent. Res. 27: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubaud, E. 1927. Sur l'hibernation de quelques mouches communes. Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 1927: 24–25 (Rev. appl. Ent. (B) 15: 85 (1927)).Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. 1956. Musca autumnalis in upstate New York. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 58: 347.Google Scholar
Stoffolano, J. G., and Matthysse, J. G.. 1967. Influence of photoperiod and temperature on diapause in the face fly, Musca autumnalis (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 1242–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teskey, H. J. 1960. A review of the life history and habits of Musca autumnalis DeGeer (Diptera: Muscidae). Can. Ent. 92: 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treece, B. E. 1960. Distribution, life history and control of the face fly in Ohio. Proc. N. cent. Brch ent. Soc. Am. 15: 107.Google Scholar
Turner, F. C. Jr., and Hair, J. A.. 1967. Effects of diet on longevity and fecundity of laboratory reared face flies. J. econ. Ent. 60: 857–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainshtein, B. A., and Rodova, R. A.. 1940. Les lieux de development des mouches de fumier dans les conditions du Tadjikistan montagneux (in Russian). Med. Parasit. Moscow 9: 364–368. (Rev. appl. Ent. (B) 31: 126 (1943)).Google Scholar
Vockeroth, J. R. 1953. Musca autumnalis Deg. in North America (Diptera: Muscidae). Can. Ent. 85: 422–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. M. 1964. Laboratory observations on the life history and habits of the face fly, Musca autumnalis (Diptera, Muscidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1957. The synoptic approach to studies of insects and climate. A. Rev. Ent. 2: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimin, L. S. 1951. Musca autumnalis in Family Muscidae, Tribus Muscine, Stomoxydine. Fauna SSSR 18 (4): 139–145.Google Scholar