Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:59:26.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olfactory and feeding preferences of Cryptorhynchus lapathi among hosts and nonhosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Cynthia L. Broberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
John H. Borden
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Regine Gries
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

In British Columbia, native willows (Salix spp.) (Salicaceae) and, to a lesser extent, black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray) (Salicaceae) are frequently attacked by the poplar and willow borer, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) (Betulaceae), trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Pursh) (Aceraceae) are not attacked. We studied olfaction and feeding preferences in the laboratory and feeding, oviposition, and emergence in the field. Female C. lapathi preferred Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana Barratt ex Hook.) over all other species by olfaction, but males did not discriminate between Scouler's willow and black cottonwood or trembling aspen. All species elicited at least some attraction in no-choice situations. Willow was generally preferred for feeding, but black cottonwood and red alder were also acceptable, unlike trembling aspen or bigleaf maple. In field caging experiments, adult weevils emerged from willow, black cottonwood, and red alder. We conclude that olfaction and feeding preferences are sufficiently powerful to mediate the frequent attack observed on native willows, the intermediate levels of attack on cottonwood, and the absence of attack on red alder. Successful development on red alder suggests that C. lapathi could expand its host range to include this species.

Résumé

En Colombie-Britannique, les saules indigènes (Salix spp.) (Salicaceae) et dans une moindre mesure le peuplier de l'Ouest (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray) (Salicaceae) sont attaqués par le charançon du saule, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.) (Coleoptera : Curculionidae). L'aulne rouge (Alnus rubra Bong.) (Betulaceae), le peuplier faux-tremble (Populus tremuloides Michx.) et l'érable à grandes feuilles (Acer macrophyllum Pursh) (Aceraceae) ne sont pas attaqués. Nous avons étudié l'olfaction et les préférences alimentaires en laboratoire ainsi que l'alimentation, la ponte et l'émergence sur le terrain. Les femelles de C. lapathi préfèrent par olfaction le saule de Scouler (Salix scouleriana Barratt ex Hook.) à toute autre espèce; les mâles sont cependant incapables de distinguer le saule de Scouler du peuplier de l'Ouest ou du peuplier faux-tremble. Toutes les espèces génèrent au moins une certaine attraction dans les situations sans choix. Les charançons préfèrent s'alimenter de saules, mais ils trouvent le peuplier de l'Ouest et l'aulne rouge acceptables, mais non le peuplier faux-tremble, ni l'érable à grandes feuilles. Dans des expériences en cages en nature, les charançons émergent des saules, des peupliers de l'Ouest et des aulnes rouges. L'olfaction et les préférences alimentaires sont donc suffisamment fortes pour provoquer les attaques fréquentes observées sur les saules indigènes, les attaques de niveau intermédiaire sur les peupliers de l'Ouest et l'absence d'attaques sur les aulnes rouges. Le développement complet de l'insecte effectué sur l'aulne rouge laisse croire que C. lapathi pourrait élargir sa gamme d'hôtes pour inclure cette espèce.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broberg, C.L., and Borden, J.H. 2005. Hybrid poplar clones demonstrate post-oviposition antibiotic resistance to Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 22542259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, C.L., Borden, J.H., and Humble, L.M. 2001. Host range, attack dynamics, and impact of Cryptorhynchus lapathi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Salix (Salicaceae) spp. The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 119130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, C.L., Borden, J.H., and Humble, L.M. 2002. Distribution and abundance of Cryptorhynchus lapathi on Salix spp. in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32: 561568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, C.L., Borden, J.H., and Gries, R. 2005. Olfactory and feeding preferences of Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) among hybrid poplar clones and natural poplars. Environmental Entomology, 34: 16061613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadahia, D. 1965. Preferencias clonales del gorgojo perforador del chopo Cryptorhynchus lapathi L. (Cole. Curculionidae). Boletin del Servicio de Plagas Forestales, 16: 115125.Google Scholar
Dafauce, C. 1976. Susceptibilidad de clones de chopo al ataque de Cryptorrhynchus lapathi L. (Col. Curculionidae). Boletin de la Estacion Central de Ecologia, 5: 3966.Google Scholar
Daniel, W.W. 1995. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Harris, J.W.E. 1964. The poplar-and-willow borer, Sternochetus lapathi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Harris, J.W.E., and Coppel, H.C. 1967. The poplar-and-willow borer, Sternochetus (= Cryptorhynchus) lapathi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist, 99: 411418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.D., and Johnson, K.R. 2003. Hybrid poplar genotype affects attack incidence by the poplar-and-willow borer (Cryptorhynchus lapathi). Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 18: 276280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Schlyter, F., and Birgersson, G.A. 1999. Forest beetles. In Pheromones of non-lepidopteran insects associated with agricultural plants. Edited by Hardie, J. and Minks, A.K.. CABI Publishing, New York. pp. 113148.Google Scholar
Smith, B.D., and Stott, K.G. 1964. The life history and behaviour of the willow weevil Cryptorrhynchus lapathi L. Annals of Applied Biology, 54: 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.B., and Rose, A.H. 1979. Insect damage to hybrid poplar plantings. In Proceedings of the North American Poplar Council Annual Meeting: Poplar Research, Management and Utilization in Canada, Brockville, Ontario, 6–9 September 1977. Edited by Fayle, D.C.F., Zsuffa, L., and Anderson, H.W.. Forest Research Information Paper 102, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, pp. 21–1.Google Scholar
Tomlin, E.S., and Borden, J.H. 1996. Feeding responses of the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Peck) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in relation to host resistance in British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist, 128: 539549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallée, G. 1979. Recherches et développement en populiculture au ministère des terres et forêts du Québec. In Proceedings of the North American Poplar Council Annual Meeting: Poplar Research, Management and Utilization in Canada, Brockville, Ontario, 6–9 September 1977. Edited by Fayle, D.C.F., Zsuffa, L., and Anderson, H.W.. Forest Research Information Paper 102, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, pp. 2–1.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar