Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:53:53.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OBSERVATIONS ON A TRIAL OF BROADCAST BURNING TO CONTROL AN INFESTATION OF THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A.J. Stock  and
R.A. Gorley
A.J. Stock
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Bumaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
R.A. Gorley
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Bumaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk., causes extensive mortality of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm., throughout western North America (Van Sickle 1982). The Prince Rupert Forest Region, in the northwest of British Columbia, initiated an aggressive beetle management program in 1981. Logging of infested stands, and winter felling and burning of individual infested trees are the most common direct control techniques.

The “Bristol Lake” infestation developed in the Bulkley Forest District, approximately 55 km northwest of Smithers, B.C., on a steep rocky ridge within the valley of Harold Price Creek. The area contained large volumes of mature lodgepole pine, and control of the infestation was therefore considered critical to the local beetle management plan, but the size (50 ha) and rough topography of the infested area precluded normal direct control measures.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 121 , Issue 6 , June 1989 , pp. 521 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klinka, K., Green, R.N., Trowbridge, R.L., and Lowe, L.E.. 1981. Taxonomic classification of humus forms in ecosystems of British Columbia. B.C. Min. For. Land Manage. Rep. 8. Victoria, B.C.Google Scholar
Lindgren, S., Borden, J.H., Cushon, J.H., Chong, L.J., and Higgins, C.J.. 1989. Reduction of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacks by verbenone in lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. In press.Google Scholar
Muraro, S.J. 1977 a. Preliminary results of using fire to control mountain pine beetle. Paper presented at Western Forest Pest Comm. meeting, Feb. 1977, Victoria, B.C. Can. For. Serv., Pacific For. Rest. Cent. File Report.Google Scholar
Muraro, S.J. 1977 b. The use of prescribed fire in the management of lodgepole pine. pp. 82–89in Dube, D.E. (Ed.), Fire Ecology in Resource Management: Workshop Proceedings, Dec. 1977. Environ. Can., Can. For. Serv., North. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. Nor-X-210.Google Scholar
Rust, H.J. 1933. Final report on the study of the relation of fire injury to beetle attack in ponderosa pine, Tubbs Hill Bum. Unpubl. Rep. Cited in Miller, J.M., and Keen, F.P.. 1960. Biology and control of the western pine beetle. USDA Misc. Publ. 800. Pacific Southwest For. and Range Exp. Sm., Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, G.A. 1982. The mountain pine beetle situation in Canada. pp. 13–15in Shrimpton, D.M. (Ed.), Proc. of the Joint Canada/U.S.A. Workshop on Mountain Pine Related Problems in Western North America. Environ. Can., Can. For. Serv., Pacific For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC-X-230.Google Scholar