Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:28:35.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NOTES ON THE NATIVE HOSTS OF SOME ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTH PARASITES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

WM. L. Putman
Affiliation:
Dominion Entomologica1 Laboratory, Vineland Station, Ont.

Extract

Within the last few years parasites have become of increasing importance in the control of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta Busck. Dr. Van Steenburgh, in a paper to be published in the Report of the Entomological Society of in Ontario for 1934, has reviewed their importance in Ontario and has shown that Glypta rufiscutellaris Cress. is the predominant native species, ranking next to the introduced Macrocentrus ancylivorus Roh. Cremastus minor Cush. is of secondary importance, while the other species occur only in small numbers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, H. W., and Lott, Earl (1930). Epiblema strenuana Walk., the host of certain parasites of the oriental fruit moth, Laspeyresia molesta Busck. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 32 (7): 135136.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. W. (1933). Glypta rufiscutellaris Cresson, an ichneumonid larval parasite of the oriental fruit moth. N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta. Te,ch. Bull. 217.Google Scholar
Montgomery, B. Elwood (1933). Preliminary studies of insect parasites in Indiana. Can. Ent. 65 (8): 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, B. B., and Driggers, , Byrley, F. (1934). Non-economic insects as intermediate hosts of parasites of the oriental fruit moth. Am. Ent. Soc. Am. 27 (4): 593598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Steenburgh, W. E. Mss.Parasites of the orient fruit moth (Laspeyresia molesta Busck.) in Ontario; a summary of 1932-33-34. To be published in Rep. Ent. Soc. Ont. 1934.Google Scholar