Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:22:36.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the Genus Foersteria Szépl. and a Redescription of Foersteria laeviuscula Szépl. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John C. Martin
Affiliation:
Entomology Laboratory, Belleville, Ontario

Extract

In preparing a revision of the triaspidine genera which occur in North America, the author has considered all the genera of this group from the world, and has found some shifting of species necessary. The genus Foersterin was created in 1896 by Szépligeti for the reception of two new species described from Europe. At that time, both the genus and the two included species were rather inadequately characterized. This situation has continued to the present day and several authors have incorrectly placed several new species from other zoogeographical regions in this genus. This paper is an attempt to clarify the concept of Szépligeti's genus, and gives a redescription of F. laeviuscula Szépl.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. 1900. Classification of the ichneumon flies, or the superfamily Ichneumonoidea. Proc. US. Nat. Mus. 23: 1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brues, C. T. 1926. Studies on Ethiopian Braconidae, with a catalogue of the African species. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 61: 205436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, P. 1904. New Hymenoptera, mostly from Nicaragua, Invert. Pacif. 1: 4669.Google Scholar
Cameron, P. 1911. On the parasitic Hymenoptera collected by Mr. A. J. T. Janse, Transvaal. Ann. Transvaal Mus. 2: 173217.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C. G. de. 1898. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum system-aticus et synonymicus. 4: Braconidae.Google Scholar
De Saeger, H. 1948. Cardiochilinae et Sigalphinae (Hymenoptera Apocrita), Family Braconidae. Explor. Parc Nat. Albert, Miss, de Witte (1933–1935), Fasc. 53.Google Scholar
Fahringer, J. 1934. Opuscula Braconologica. Palaearkrische Region. Band 3.Google Scholar
Niezabitowski, E. L. 1910. Materyaly do fauny Brakonidow Polski, I. Akademia Umiejetnosci w Krakowie Sprawozdanie Komisyi Fizyograficzne j ciagu roku 1909 oraz Materyaly do fizyografii Krajowei 44: 49105.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. 1930. Die Hymenopteren Nord- und Mitteleuropas. Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. 1896. Ueber Polydegmon Foerster und eine neue Gattung der Sigalphidae. Wien. Ent. Zeit. 15: 145149.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. 1896. Adatok a Magyar fauna Braconidainak ismeretéhez. (Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Ungarischen Braconiden). Természetrajzi Füzetek, Kiadja a Magyar nemzeti Museum 19: 285321.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. 1901. A palaearktibus Braconidak meghatarozo tablazatai. Potfuzetek a Termeszettudomanyi Kozlonyhoz. (Beiblatter zu den naturwissenschaftlichen Mittheilungen) 33: 261288.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. 1904. Ubersicht der Gattung und Arten der palaarktischen Braconiden. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Berichte ans Ungarn mit Unterstutzung der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Koniglich Ungarischen Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft (1901) 19: 145203.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. 1904. Hymenoptera. Fam. Braconidae. In Genera Insectorum, by Wytsman, P., Fase. 22.Google Scholar
Telenga, N. A. 1941. Fam. Braconidae: sous-fam. Braconinae (cont.) et Sigalphinae. Faune de l'U.R.SS. Insectes Hyménoptères 5(3).Google Scholar
Viereck, H. L. 1914. Type species of the genera of ichneumon flies. US. Nat. Mus. Bull. 83.Google Scholar