Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:58:32.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on Insects and Other Arthropods in Red and White Pine Logging Slash1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Extract

Logging slash constitutes an environment supporting a particular association of insects and other arthropods. At first, the species in the community are governed by the character of the slash, but with the passage of time the condition of the slash changes, the rate of change being directly affected by bark beetles and other wood borers that facilitate entry of wood-destroying fungi. As the environment changes, those species for which the habitat is no longer suitable drop out, leaving in the association only those that can exist under the new conditions. Insect communities in slash, logs, and dying trees have been studied by Hopkins (1893, 1899), Clemens (1916), Blackman and Stage (1918, 1924), Graham (1925), DeLeon (1934), Beal and Massey (1945), Howden and Vogt (1951), and others. The succession of communities of animals inhabiting slash, logs, and dying and dead trees has been shown by Adams (1915) and Savely (1939) to continue until the wood has disintegrated completely.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. C. 1915. An ecological study of prairie and forest invertebrates. Bull. Ill. State. Lab. Nat. Hist. 11: 30280.Google Scholar
Beal, J. A. and Massey, C. L.. 1945. Bark beetles and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytoidea) with special reference to species occurring in North Carolina, 178 pp., Duke University, School of Forestry, Bull. 10.Google Scholar
Blackman, M. W. and Stage, H. H.. 1918. Notes on insects bred from the bark and wood of the American larch, Larix laricina (DuRoi) K. Koch., N.Y. State Coll. of Forestry Tech. Pub. 10: 11115.Google Scholar
Blackman, M. W. and Stage, H. H.. 1924. On the succession of insects living in the bark and wood of dying, dead and decaying hickory, N.Y. State Coll. of Forestry Tech. Pub. 17: 3272.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous insects, 688 pp., McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc. New York and London.Google Scholar
Clemens, W. A. 1916. The pine bark beetle, Cor. Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 383: 287298.Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1934. The families and genera of North American Diptera, 512 pp., The Ballou Press, New York.Google Scholar
DeLeon, D. 1934. An annotated list of the parasites, predators and other associated fauna of the mountain pine beetle in western pine and lodgepole pine. Can. Ent. 66 (3): 5166.Google Scholar
Graham, S. A. 1925. The felled tree trunk as an ecological unit. Ecol. 6 (4): 397411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, W. E. D. 1937. A forest classification for Canada, 50 pp., Canada Dept. of Resources and Development, Forestry Branch, For. Res. Div. Bull. 89.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1893. Catalogue of West Virginia Scolytidae and their enemies. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 31: 121168.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1899. Report on investigations to determine the cause of unhealthy conditions of spruce and pine from 1880–1893. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 56: 197461.Google Scholar
Howden, H. F. and Vogt, G. B.. 1951. Insect communities of standing dead pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.), Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 44 (4): 581595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaston, B. J. and Riggs, D. S.. 1937. Studies on the larvae of the native elm bark beetle. J. Econ. Ent. 30(1): 98108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A. 1951. Larvae of insects, Part II. 416 pp., Lithoprinted, Edwards Brothers Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Savely, H. E. Jr. 1939. Ecological relations of certain animals in dead pine and oak logs. Ecol. Monog. 9(3): 323385.Google Scholar