Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:15:09.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on a Laboratory Infection of Diptera Caused by the Fungus Empusa muscae Cohn1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Ronald B. Baird
Affiliation:
Entomology Laboratory, Belleville, Ontario

Extract

The signs of an Empusa muscae Cohn infection in dead flies were described over two centuries ago by de Geer (Kirby and Spence, 1826), who, however, attributed the cause to some factor other than a microorganism. Though the validity of the name Empusa has often been questioned, it is used in this paper following the suggestion by MacLeod (1956).

The following account deals with the transmission of E. muscae to species of Diptera under controlled laboratory conditions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dustan, A. G. 1924. The control of the European apple sucker, Psylla mali Schmidb., in Nova Scotia. Canada Dept. Agr. Pam. 45 (n.s.).Google Scholar
Harris, M. R. 1948. A phycomycete parasitic on aphids. Phytopathology 38: 118122.Google Scholar
Kirby, W., and Spence, W.. 1826. An introduction to entomology: or elements of the natural history of insects. Vol. 4. Longman, London.Google Scholar
MacLeod, D. M. 1956. Notes on the genus Empusa Cohn. Canadian J. Bot. 34: 1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, G. 1947. Uber die Kultur von Empusa muscae Cohn und anderen Entomophthoracean auf kalt sterilisierten Nährböden. Planta 35: 132176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speare, A. T. 1912. Fungi parasitic upon insects injurious to sugar cane. Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Assoc. Expt. Sta., Path. Physiol. Bull. 12.Google Scholar
Thaxter, R. 1888. The Entomophthoreae of the United States. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 4: 133201.Google Scholar