Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:40:20.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION OF THE HOST TREE AND POPULATION GROWTH OF THE BALSAM WOOLLY APHID, ADELGES PICEAE (HOMOPTERA: ADELGIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. Roderick Carrow
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Victoria, British Columbia
K. Graham
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia

Abstract

The relationship between nutrition of the host tree, Abies amabilis (Dougl.) Forbes, as influenced by nitrogen fertilizers, and the growth of populations of the balsam woolly aphid, Adelges piceae (Ratz.), was investigated. Sixty trees, growing in a greenhouse in two soil types, a nutrient-deficient mineral soil and an enriched humic soil, were infested with woolly aphid larvae. Subsequently, groups of 10 trees received foliar treatments of various concentrations of ammonium nitrate and urea. The following year, 32 young trees in Seymour Valley, B.C., were studied to determine the effect of fertilization of uninfested trees on establishment of aphid larvae.

In the greenhouse, foliar sprays of 1% ammonium nitrate solution resulted in a 23% decrease in population in 10 weeks, as contrasted with a 31% increase in the control population. In the field, larval establishment was 31% to 37% lower on the ammonium nitrate-treated trees than on the control trees. Inasmuch as there was no evidence of increased mortality of aphids in situ, we infer that the fertilizer acts primarily by inhibiting initial settling of larvae on the host trees.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Based in part on research conducted by J. R. Carrow in partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., and supported by aid from Canada Department of Forestry and Rural Development.

References

Balch, R. E. 1952. Studies of the balsam woolly aphid, Adelges piceae (Ratz.), and its effects on balsam fir, Abies balsamea (L.) Mill. Can. Dep. Agric. Publ. 867.Google Scholar
Beck, S. D. 1965. Resistance of plants to insects. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. C., and Larsen, H. S.. 1965. Soil nutrients and loblolly pine xylem sap composition. Forest Sci. 11(2): 216220.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. E. 1965. The balsam woolly aphid, Adelges piceae (Ratz.) in British Columbia. Rep. For. Res. Lab., Forest Insect and Disease Surv., Can. Dep. For., Victoria.Google Scholar
House, H. L. 1961. Insect nutrition. A. Rev. Ent. 6: 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L. 1965. Effects of low levels of nutrient content of a food and of nutrient imbalance on the feeding and nutrition of a phytophagous larva, Celerio euphorbiae . Can. Ent. 97: 6268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L. 1966 a. The role of nutritional principles in biological control. Can. Ent. 98: 11211134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L. 1966 b. Effects of varying the ratio between amino acids and other nutrients in conjunction with a salt mixture on the fly, Agria affinis . J. Insect Physiol. 12: 299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBeath, D. K. et al. , 1960. The nutritional value of increased levels of protein resulting from nitrogen fertilization of barley. Can. J. Animal Sci. 40: 5758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merker, E. 1962. Augenblicltlicher Stand der Untersuchungen über die schädigende Wirkungsweise von Düngestoffen auf Waldschädlinge. Allgem. Forst-u. Jagdztg. 133: 8183.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. G., Johnson, N. E., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1961. Seasonal history of the balsam woolly aphid in the Pacific Northwest. Can. Ent. 93: 794798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E., and Dadd, R. H.. 1965 a. Feeding behaviour of the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) in relation to the suitability of host plants. Proc. XII int. Congr. Ent. (London). p. 548.Google Scholar
Mittler, T. E., and Dadd, R. H.. 1965 b. Differences in probing responses of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) elicited by different feeding solutions behind a Parafilm membrane. Entomologia exp. appl. 8: 107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnesorge, B. 1957. Untersuchungen über die Populationsdynamik der Kleinen Fichtenblattwespe. Z. angew. Ent. 40: 433493.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. G. 1960. Nutrition of the host and reaction to pests. Publs Am. Ass. Advmt Sci. 61: 149167.Google Scholar
Stark, R. W. 1965. Recent trends in forest entomology. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 303324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar