Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:41:09.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new standard pupation shelter for sampling pupae and estimating mortality of the hemlock looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Christian Hébert ,
Luc Jobin ,
Richard Berthiaume ,
Jean-François Mouton ,
Alain Dupont  and
Clément Bordeleau
Christian Hébert*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 du P.E.P.S., PO Box 3800, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4C7
Luc Jobin
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 du P.E.P.S., PO Box 3800, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4C7
Richard Berthiaume
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 du P.E.P.S., PO Box 3800, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4C7
Jean-François Mouton
Affiliation:
CLC-Camint Inc, 227 boulevard St-Joseph (2e étage), Gatineau (secteur Hull), Québec, Canada J8Y 3X5
Alain Dupont
Affiliation:
Société de protection des forêts contre les insectes et maladies, 1780 Semple, Québec, Québec, Canada G1N 4B8
Clément Bordeleau
Affiliation:
Ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs, Direction de la conservation, Complexe scientifique, 2700 Einstein, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1P 3W8
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new standard pupation shelter for sampling hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria) pupae is described and compared with the burlap band method developed by Otvos (1974; The Canadian Entomologist106: 329–31). The new pupation shelter is placed on the bole, at breast height or in the crown, to estimate population abundance and mortality. The utilization of two shelters at breast height was as efficient as the use of burlap bands to estimate hemlock looper abundance and more efficient for sampling braconid cocoons. It provided reliable estimates of braconid and tachinid parasitism but overestimated that by ichneumonids. This new pupation shelter is an inexpensive tool that can be used easily by nonspecialized personnel, thus allowing increases in the number of sample plots, which is necessary to improve detection of outbreaks of the hemlock looper. This new shelter could be used to sample other lepidopterans whose late-instar larvae aggregate in concealed pupation sites.

Résumé

Un nouveau gîte de nymphose standard pour échantillonner les chrysalides de l'arpenteuse de la pruche (Lambdina fiscellaria) est décrit et comparé avec la méthode des bandes de jute développée par Otvos (1974; The Canadian Entomologist106: 329–31). Le nouveau gîte de nymphose est placé sur le tronc, à hauteur de poitrine ou dans la cime, pour estimer l'abondance et la mortalité des populations. L'utilisation de deux gîtes de nymphose à hauteur de poitrine est aussi efficace que les bandes de jute pour estimer l'abondance de l'arpenteuse de la pruche et plus efficace pour échantillonner les cocons de braconidae. Il procure des estimations fiables du parasitisme par les braconidae et les tachinidae mais surestime celui fait par les ichneumonidae. Ce nouveau gîte de nymphose est un outil peu coûteux qui peut être utilisé par du personnel non-spécialisé, permettant ainsi d'augmenter le nombre de parcelles d'échantillonnage nécessaires afin d'améliorer la détection des épidémies de l'arpenteuse de la pruche. Ce nouveau gîte de nymphose pourrait être utilisé pour échantillonner d'autres Lépidoptères dont les larves âgées se rassemblent dans des sites de pupaison leur permettant de se dissimuler.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 136 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 879 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brodeur, J., McNeil, J.N. 1989. Seasonal microhabitat selection by an endoparasitoid through adaptive modification of host behavior. Science (Washington, D.C.) 244: 226–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodeur, J., McNeil, J.N. 1992. Host behaviour modification by the endoparasitoid Aphidius nigripes: a strategy to reduce hyperparasitism. Ecological Entomology 17: 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, W.J. 1956. History of the hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Guen.), (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Newfoundland, and note on its biology. The Canadian Entomologist 88: 587–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobesberger, E.J. 1989. A sequential decision plan for the management of the eastern hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), in Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 911–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenden, M.L., Borden, J.H., Van Sickle, G.A., Gries, G. 1995 a. Development of a pheromone-based monitoring system for western hemlock looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): effect of pheromone dose, lure age, and trap type. Environmental Entomology 24: 923–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenden, M.L., Borden, J.H., Van Sickle, G.A. 1995 b. Predictive capabilities of a pheromone-based monitoring system for western hemlock looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Environmental Entomology 24: 933–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, C., Jobin, L. 2001. The hemlock looper. Revised. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre Information Leaflet LFC-4Google Scholar
Hébert, C., Jobin, L., Berthiaume, R., Coulombe, C., Dupont, A. 2001. Changes in hemlock looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) pupal distribution through a 3-year outbreak cycle. Phytoprotection 82: 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, C., Jobin, L., Auger, M., Dupont, A. 2003. Oviposition traps to survey eggs of Lambdina fiscellaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 768–76Google Scholar
Jervis, M.A., Kidd, N.A.C. 1986. Host-feeding strategies in hymenopteran parasitoids. Biological Reviews 61: 395–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobin, L.J., Desaulniers, R. 1981. Results of aerial spraying in 1972 and 1973 to control the eastern hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Guen.)) on Anticosti Island. Environment Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forest Research Centre Information Report LAU-X-49EGoogle Scholar
Liang, Q., Otvos, I.S., Bradfield, G.E. 1996. Distribution pattern and sampling of eggs of the western hemlock looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in mature western hemlock stands. Journal of Economic Entomology 89: 1531–6Google Scholar
Liang, Q., Otvos, I.S., Bradfield, G.E. 1997. Forest roadside sampling of larvae and adults of the western hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa. Forest Ecology and Management 93: 45–53Google Scholar
Liang, Q., Otvos, I.S., Bradfield, G.E. 1998. Pupal sampling of the western hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) using burlap traps. Journal of Applied Entomology 122: 85–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, D.A., Ebert, P. 1999. The impact of hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Guen.)) on balsam fir and spruce in New Brunswick, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 120: 77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otvos, I.S. 1974. A collecting method for pupae of Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The Canadian Entomologist 106: 329–31Google Scholar
Otvos, I.S., Bryant, D.G. 1972. An extraction method for rapid sampling of eastern hemlock looper eggs, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The Canadian Entomologist 104: 1511–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otvos, I.S., Clarke, L.J., Durling, D.S. 1979. A history of recorded eastern hemlock looper outbreaks in Newfoundland. Environment Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Newfoundland Forest Research Centre Information Report N-X-179Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT® user's guide. Version 8. Volumes 1, 2, and 3. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, R.F., Gray, T.G. 1972. Solution separation and maximum likelihood density estimates of hemlock looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) eggs in moss. The Canadian Entomologist 104: 751–4Google Scholar
Shore, T.L. 1989. Sampling western hemlock looper pupae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) using burlap traps. Journal of Entomological Science 24: 348–54Google Scholar
Shore, T.L. 1990. Recommendations for sampling and extracting the eggs of the western hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa, (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 87: 30–5Google Scholar
Watson, E.B. 1934. An account of the eastern hemlock looper, Ellopia fiscellaria Gn., on balsam fir. Science in Agriculture 14: 669–78Google Scholar
Weseloh, R.M. 1974. Relationships between different sampling procedures for the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and its natural enemies. The Canadian Entomologist 106: 225–31Google Scholar
Weseloh, R.M. 1983. Population sampling method for cocoons of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) parasite, Apanteles melanoscelus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and relationship of its population levels to predator- and hyperparasite-induced mortality. Environmental Entomology 12: 1228–31Google Scholar
Weseloh, R.M. 1987. Accuracy of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) population estimates based on counts of larvae in artificial resting sites. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 80: 361–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar