Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T17:03:46.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New species of the genus Camisia (Acari: Oribatida): an arboreal mite with enclosed sensilli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Z. Olszanowski
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, A Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 91 A, 60-569 Poznań, Poland
M.R. Clayton*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8Z 1M5
L.M. Humble
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8Z 1M5
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

A new oribatid mite (Acari), Camisia abdosensillasp.nov., is described from all instars, based on specimens from British Columbia, Canada. This species occurs on branches and foliose lichens in the canopies of western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg., 1898 (Pinaceae), and Pacific silver fir, Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex J. Forbes, 1939 (Pinaceae), growing in high elevation coastal forests. The most unusual feature of this species is the distinctive structure of the prodorsal trichobothrium in adults; the significantly reduced sensillus is completely enclosed within the bothridium. A resemblance between the structure of this organ and those of the superfamily Crotonioidea appears to have resulted from parallel evolution rather than being evidence of a sister-group relationship. Another species, Camisia islandica Gjelstrup and Solhøy, 1994, is herein recognized as a junior synonym of Camisia solhoeyi Colloff, 1993. A key of the Nearctic species of the genus Camisia is given.

Résumé

Un nouvel acarien (Acari) oribate, Camisia abdosensillasp.nov., est décrit à tous ses stades, à partir de spécimens recueillis en Colombie-Britannique (Canada). Cette espèce est présente sur les branches et les lichens foliacés du houppier de proches de l'Ouest, Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg., 1898 (Pinaceae), et de sapins gracieux, Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex J. Forbes, 1939 (Pinaceae), poussant dans les forêts côtières en haute altitude. La caractéristique la plus inhabituelle de cette espèce est la structure distinctive de la trichobothrie prodorsale chez l'adulte : cette sensille, notablement réduite, est complètement enfermée à l'intérieur de la bothridie. La ressemblance entre la structure de cet organe et la structure du même organe dans la superfamille des Crotonioidea semble être le résultat d'une évolution parallèle plutôt qu'une indication d'un lien de parenté. Une autre espèce, Camisia islandica Gjelstrup et Solhøy, 1994, est considérée ici comme un synonyme de Camisia solhoeyi Colloff, 1993. Une clé d'identification des espèces néarctiques de genre Camisia est présentée.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, G. 1998. Fine structure of receptor organs in oribatid mites (Acari). pp 2777in Ebermann, E. (Ed), Arthropod biology: contributions to morphology, ecology and systematics. Biosystematics and Ecology Series 14Google Scholar
André, H.M. 1980. Description of Camisia carolli n.sp., with a comparison to two other arboreal Camisia (Acari, Oribatida). International Journal of Acarology 6(2): 141–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, H.M., Lebrun, P., Leroy, S. 1984. The systematic status and geographical distribution of Camisia segnis (Acari: Oribatida). International Journal of Acarology 10(3): 153–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, J. 1973. Soil mites (Oribatids) climbing trees. pp 5965in Daniel, M. and Rosický, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Acarology, Prague, 31 August – 6 September 1971. The Hague, the Netherlands: Dr W Junk BVCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.L. 1979. Critical point drying—principles and procedures. Scanning Electron Microscopy 2: 303–22Google Scholar
Colloff, M.J. 1993. A taxonomic revision of the oribatid mite genus Camisia (Acari: Oribatida). Journal of Natural History 27: 1325–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1936. Les Oribates de Jean Frédéric Hermann et de son pere (Arachn. Acar.). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France 105: 27110Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1939. Observations sur les Oribates (12e série). Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle du Paris 11: 300–7Google Scholar
Grandjean, F. 1950. Observations éthologiques sur Camisia segnis (Herm.) et Platynothrus peltifer (Koch) (Acariens). Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle du Paris 22: 204–31Google Scholar
Green, R.N., Klinka, K. 1994. A field guide for site identification and interpretation for the Vancouver Forest Region. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Land Management Handbook 28Google Scholar
Hayes, T.L., Pawley, J.B. 1975. Very small biological specimens. pp 4581in Hayat, M.A. (Ed), Principles and techniques of scanning electron microscopy. Biological applications. Volume 3. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold CoGoogle Scholar
Norton, R.A., Palacios-Vargas, J.G. 1982. Nueva Belba (Oribatei: Damaeidae) de musgos epifitos de Mexico. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 52: 6173Google Scholar
Olszanowski, Z. 1997. On the genus Holonothrus (Acari: Oribatida) in the Australian region. Acarologia 38(4): 385402Google Scholar
Palmer, S.C., Norton, R.A. 1991. Taxonomic, geographic and seasonal distribution of thelytokous parthenogenesis in the Desmonomata (Acari: Oribatida). Experimental and Applied Acarology 12: 6781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seniczak, S. 1991. The morphology of juvenile stages of moss mites of the family Camisiidae (Acari: Oribatida), V. Zoologischer Anzeiger 227(3–4): 173–84Google Scholar
Travé, J., Vachon, M. 1975. François Grandjean, 1882–1975 (Notice Biographique et Bibliographique). Acarologia 17: 119Google Scholar