Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:55:36.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NEW AMERICAN GENERA OF LAUXANIIDAE, BASED ON SPECIES OF EARLIER AUTHORS, AND A NOTE ON LYCIELLA RORIDA (FALLÉN) IN NORTH AMERICA (DIPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. E. Shewell
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6

Abstract

New genera Hirtodeceia, Marmarodeceia, Oncodometopus, Pachyopella, Poecilolycia, Trisapromyza, and Xeniconeura are described. The first two are exclusively Neotropical; the others occur also in the Nearctic Region. Relationships with other genera are discussed, and included species are listed. Homoneura (Euhomoneura) pictipennis Hendel is a preoccupied name, and the species is renamed and assigned to Marmarodeceia. Lyciella Collin is discussed, and L. rorida (Fallén) is recorded for the first time in North America.

Résumé

L’auteur décrit de nouveaux genres Hirtodeceia, Marmarodeceia, Oncodometopus, Pachyopella, Poecilolycia, Trisapromyza, et Xeniconeura. Les deux premiers sont exclusivement néotropicaux, les autres apparaissent aussi dans la région néarctique. L’interrelation avec les autres genres est discutée, et les espèces qui doivent être incluses sont énumérées. Homoneura (Euhomoneura) pictipennis Hendel est un homonyme, mais l’espèce est maintenant renommée et classifiée sous le nouveau genre Marmarodeceia. Le genre Lyciella Collin est discuté, et L. rorida (Fallén) est vu pour la première fois en Amérique du Nord.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, T. 1919. Diptères. Brachycères. In Mission du Service géographique de l'Armée pour la mesure d'un arc de méridien équatorial en Amérique du Sud. 1899–1906. Ministr. Instr. Publ. (Paris) 10 (2): 163215.Google Scholar
Collin, J.E. 1948. A short synopsis of the British Sapromyzidae (Diptera). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 99: 225242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1902. New acalyptrate Diptera from North America. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 10: 177191.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. Jr., 1920. Descriptions of new North American acalyptrate Diptera — II. (Trypetidae, Sapromyzidae). Ent. News 31: 6567.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1942. American Diptera. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 80(3): 5184.Google Scholar
Czerny, L. 1932. Fam. Lauxaniidae. pp. 176in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region. Lfg. 50. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.F. 1820. Ortalides Sveciae. Lund. pp. 2634.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1907. Neue und interessante Dipteren aus dem Kaiserl. Museum in Wien. Wien. ent. Ztg. 26: 223245.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1925/1926. Neue Ubersicht über die bisher bekannt gewordenen Gattungen der Lauxaniidae, nebst Beschreibung neuer Gattungen u. Arten. Encycl. ent. B. Dipt. 11: 103–112 (1925), 113142 (1926).Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1936. Ergebnisse einer zoologischen Sammelreise nach Brasilien, insbesondere in das Amazonasgebiet, ausgeführt von Dr. H. Zerny. X. Diptera: Muscidae acalyptratae (excl. Chloropidae). Annln. naturh. Mus. Wien. 47: 61106.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.W. 1919. A revised list of the Diptera of Jamaica. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 41(8): 421449.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1861 a. Diptera Americae septentrionalis indigena. Centuria prima. Berl. ent. Z. 5: 307359.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1861 b. Beschreibung einiger neuer europäischen Dipteren. Wien. ent. Mschr. 5: 348353.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1863. Diptera Americae septentrionalis indigena. Centuria tertia. Berl. ent. Z. 7: 155.Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1835. Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Diptères. II. 703 pp.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1924. In Malloch, J.R., and McAtee, W.L., Keys to flies of the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, and Sapromyzidae of the eastern United States, with a list of the species of the District of Columbia region. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 65 (12): 126.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1926. New genera and species of acalyptrate flies in the United States National Museum. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 68(21): 135.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1933. Acalyptratae. pp. 177391in Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile. VI., Fasc. 4. British Mus. (nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
Melander, A.L. 1913. A synopsis of the Sapromyzidae. Psyche, Camb. 20: 5782.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. et al. , 1981. Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 1. Res. Br., Agric. Can. Monogr. 27. 674 pp. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Miller, R.M., and Foote, B.A., 1975. Biology and immature stages of eight species of Lauxaniidae (Diptera). I. Biological observations. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 77: 308328.Google Scholar
Miller, R.M., and Foote, B.A., 1976. II. Descriptions of immature stages and discussion of larval feeding habits and morphology. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 78: 1637.Google Scholar
Papp, L. 1978. Contribution to the Revision of the Palaearctic Lauxaniidae (Diptera). Annls. hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 70: 213231.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J.B. 1830. Essai sur les Myodaires. Mém. Acad. Sci. Inst. Fr. (Paris) 2: 1813.Google Scholar
Shewell, G.E. 1965. Lauxaniidae. In Stone, A. et al. (Ed.) A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S.D.A., Agric. Res. Serv., Agric. Handbk. 276. 1696 pp.Google Scholar
Steyskal, G.C. 1971. The species related to Minettia obscura (Loew), with one new species and one new synonym (Diptera): Lauxaniidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 73: 1722.Google Scholar
Stone, A. et al. , 1965. A Catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S.D.A., Agric. Res. Serv., Handbk. 276. 1696 pp. Washington.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C.R.W. 1824. Analecta entomologica ex Museo regio Havniensi. Kiel. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C.R.W. 1830. Aussereuropäische zweiflügelige Insekten. Hamm. Vol. 2. pp. 1608.Google Scholar