Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T05:22:46.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nearctic Species of Macrosteles (Homoptera: Cicadellidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Bryan P. Beirne
Bryan P. Beirne
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology, Division of Entomology, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The correct identifications of North American species of leafhoppers of the genus Macrosteles (sensu lato) are important because of the economic significance of one of them as a carrier of a virus disease of many species of plants. In the past, such identifications have been difficult to make because the extent of the variation in colour, markings, and structure that occurs has not been appreciated fully, because some species were misidentified in previous revisions, and because there were a number of unrecognized species in the fauna.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 84 , Issue 7 , July 1952 , pp. 208 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. 1904. The Homoptera of Alaska. Harriman Alaskan Expedition 8: 129–137.Google Scholar
Ball, E. D. 1900. Additions to the western jassid fauna. Canadian Ent. 32: 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Long, D. M. 1923. Family Cicadellidae. In Guide to the insects of Connecticut. Part IV. The Hemiptera or sucking insects of Connecticut, ed. by Britton, W. E., pp. 53–163. Connecticut Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 34.Google Scholar
De Long, D. M. 1924. Some new Cicadellidae (Homoptera) from the southern United States. J. New York Ent. Soc. 32: 63–67.Google Scholar
De Long, D. M. 1942. The leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 24: 97–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Long, D. M., and Davidson, R. H.. 1934. Some new species of Cicadellidae (Homoptera) from the United States, J. New York Ent. Soc. 42: 221–224.Google Scholar
Dorst, W. E. 1931. Studies on the genus Cicadula (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Kansas Ent. Soc. 4: 39–48.Google Scholar
Dorst, W. E. 1937. A revision of the leafhoppers of the Macrosteles group (Cicadula of authors) in America north of Mexico. U.S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Pub. 271.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1891. On the British species of the genus Cicadula (Zett.) Fieber. Ent. Mon. Mag. 27: 27–32.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1924. Some new or little-known British Cicadina. Ent. Mon. Mag. 60: 52–58.Google Scholar
Fallen, C. F. 1806. Forsok till Svenska cicad-artens uppstallning och beskrifning. Nya Handl. Svenska Vet. Akad. 27: 6–43.Google Scholar
Fallen, C. F. 1826. Cicadriae, earumque familiae, affines. Hemipt. Sueciae 2: 1–80.Google Scholar
Fieber, F. X. 1866. Neue gattungen und arten in Homoptera (Cicadina Bur.). Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien 6: 497–516.Google Scholar
Fieber, F. X. 1885. Description des cicadines d'Europe des genres Cicadula et Thamnotettix. Rev. Ent. 4: 40–110.Google Scholar
Forbes, S. A. 1885. Report of the State Entomologist on the noxious and beneficial insects of the State of Illinois 14: 1–136.Google Scholar
Gillette, C. P., and Baker, C. F.. 1895. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of Colorado. Colorado Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 31: 1–137.Google Scholar
Herrich-Schaffer, G. A. W. 1838. [Descriptions of species in] Deutschlands Insecten 153: 1–5.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. 1929. Leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) found on sugar beet in Iowa. J. Econ. Ent. 22: 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lethierry, L. F. 1878. Description de deux Homopteres nouveaux. Soc. Hist. Nat. Metz. Bull. 15: 127–130.Google Scholar
Linn, M. B. 1940. The yellows disease of lettuce and endive. Cornell Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 742. 3–33.Google Scholar
Medler, J. T. 1942. The leafhoppers of Minnesota. Univ. Minnesota Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 115.Google Scholar
Oman, P. W. 1934. Some new species and a new genus of North American deltocephaline leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Homoptera). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 36: 75–81.Google Scholar
Oman, P. W. 1949. The Nearctic leafhoppers. Mem. Ent. Soc. Washington 3.Google Scholar
Osborn, W. 1915. Leafhoppers of Maine. Maine Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 238: 81–160.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1948. Catalogus insectorum Sueciae, VIII. Hemiptera Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha. Opusc. Ent. 1948, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1886. (Nya former af Hemiptera). Medd. Soc. Fauna FI. Fennica 13: 211.Google Scholar
Ribaut, H. 1927. Trois especes nouvelles du genre Cicadula. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse Bull. 56: 162–169.Google Scholar
Ribaut, H. 1948. Demembrement de quelques genres de Jassidae. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse Bull. 83: 57–59.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J. R. 1871. Ofversigt af Finlands och den Skandinaviska hälfrons Cicadariae I. Not. Fennica 9: 1–506.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1875. On certain British Hemiptera-Homoptera. Ent. Mon. Mag. 11: 229–232.Google Scholar
Severin, H. H. P. 1940. Potato naturally infected with California aster yellows. Phytopathology 30: 1049–1051.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1858. Beitrag zur Hemipteren-fauna Siberiens und des Russischen Nord-Amerika. Stettiner Ent. Zeit. 19: 175–198.Google Scholar
Uhler, P. R. 1876. List of Hemiptera of the region west of the Mississippi River, including those collected during the Hayden Explorations of 1873. U.S. Geol. Geogr. Sur. Terr. Bull. 1: 269–361.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1891. New North American Homoptera.—III. Canadian Ent. 23, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1893. New North American Homoptera.—VI. Canadian Ent. 25: 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1894. New North American Homoptera—VIII. Canadian Ent. 26: 136–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetrerstedr, J. W. 1840. Ordo III. Hemiptera. Insecta Lappanica 1: 1–314.Google Scholar