Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:36:48.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NATIVE HOST PLANTS OF THE LARVAE OF THE RED TURNIP BEETLE, ENTOMOSCELIS AMERICANA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. H. Gerber
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2M9

Abstract

The suitability of four indigenous species (Descurainia pinnata (Walt.) Britt., D. richardsonii (Sweet) O.E. Schulz, Lepidium densiflorum Schrad., and Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser) and one introduced species (Erysimum cheiranthoides L.) of Cruciferae as host plants for the larvae of the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana Brown, was tested in the laboratory using excised true leaves as food and Brassica napus L. and D. sophia (L.) Webb as control treatments. R. palustris was a suitable food plant. D. pinnata, D. richardsonii, E. cheiranthoides, and L. densiflorum were marginally suitable. Of the four indigenous species, R. palustris probably is the only one that normally is a host plant of the larvae in nature.

Résumé

On a mené des essais en laboratoire afin de déterminer si quatre crucifère indigènes (Descurainia pinnata (Walt.) Britt., D. richardsonii (Sweet) O.E. Schulz, Lepidium densiflorum Schrad. et Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser) ainsi qu'une espèce introduite (Erysimum cheiranthoides L.) étaient des plantes hôtes appropriées pour la chrysomèle du navet, Entomoscelis americana Brown, en utilisant comme aliment les premières feuilles fraîchement coupées de ces plantes, et Brassica napus L. et D. sophia (L.) Webb comme traitements témoins. R. palustris est une plante adéquate, tandis que D. pinnata, D. richardsonii, E. cheiranthoides et L. densiflorum conviennent à la limite. Des quatres espèces indigènes, R. palustris est probablement la seule qui soit normalement une plante hôte des larves en nature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, S. (Ed.). 1983. Herbivorous Insects. Host-Seeking Behavior and Mechanisms. Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Brown, W. J. 1942. The American species of Entomoscelis and Hippuriphila (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 74: 172176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J. 1905. Insects injurious to grain and fodder crops, root crops and vegetables. Can. Exp. Farm Bull. 52. 48 pp.Google Scholar
Frankton, C. and Mulligan, G. A.. 1970. Weeds of Canada. Can. Dep. Agric. Publ. 948. 217 pp.Google Scholar
Gerber, G. H. 1981. Cold-hardiness in the eggs of the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 113: 795800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, G. H. 1982. A pest management system for the red turnip beetle on rapeseed and canola. Can. Agric. 27(3): 811.Google Scholar
Gerber, G. H. 1984. Effects of starvation in the first instar larva on growth, development and survival in the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 116: 529536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, G. H. and Lamb, R. J.. 1982. Phenology of egg hatching for the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Ent. 11: 12581263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, G. H. and Obadofin, A. A.. 1981 a. Growth, development, and survival of the larvae of the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on Brassica campestris and B. napus (Cruciferae). Can. Ent. 113: 395406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, G. H. and Obadofin, A. A. 1981 b. The suitability of nine species of Cruciferae as hosts for the larvae of the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 113: 407413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, F. R. and Berkenkamp, B.. 1975. Revised growth-stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 55: 657658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedge, I. C. 1976. A systematic and geographic survey of the old world Cruciferae. pp. 1–45 in Vaughan, J. G., MacLeod, A. J., and Jones, B. M. G. (Eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Cruciferae. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Porsild, A. E. and Cody, W. J.. 1980. Vascular Plants of Continental Northwest Territories, Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. 1975. Insect Ecology. Wiley, New York and London.Google Scholar
Scoggan, H. J. 1978. The Flora of Canada. Part 3 — Dicotyledoneae (Saururaceae to Violaceae). National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Scriber, J. M. and Slansky, F. Jr., 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. A. Rev. Ent. 26: 183211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. B. 1973. The red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana Brown (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), biology and plant relationships. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Alberta, Edmonton. 86 pp.Google Scholar
The Canadian Insect Pest Review. 1951. Can. Dep. Agric., Div. Ent. 29: 175A.Google Scholar