Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:24:52.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MULTIPLE PARASITISM OF ARMORED COCCIDS (HOMOPTERA) BY HOST-REGULATIVE APHELINIDS (HYMENOPTERA); ECTOPARASITES VERSUS ENDOPARASITES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S. E. Flanders
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside

Abstract

When a host-regulative ectoparasite and a host-regulative endoparasite compete for the same host population (multiple parasitism) the former largely replaces the latter when the host’s density is high, the ectoparasite then being relatively numerous and the endoparasite scarce. However, after the ectoparasite has reduced the host population to a low density the converse is true, the endoparasite being more numerous. This difference is an effect of the endoparasite being able to operate at lower host densities; an essential adaptation if it is to survive competition with a host-regulative ectoparasitic population. The above conclusions are based (1) on the statistical analyses of numerous population samples of ectoparasitic and endoparasitic species of the family Aphelinidae (Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera) imported into California while inhabiting host coccids (Diaspididae: Homoptera); (2) on field observations by the writer and the reports of others on the numerical status of such hosts and their specific parasites in gardens and orchards in various countries, those in which the species are indigenous as well as in those where they are exotic; (3) on the principles of multiple parasitism as elucidated by Harry S. Smith; and (4) on multiple parasitism by an ectoparasite and a host-specific endoparasite being characterized by the ectoparasite always destroying the endoparasite when both are attacking the same host individual and the endoparasite replacing the ectoparasite when populations of both are subsisting on a low density host population.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davenport, V. P. 1949. Studies in the pharmacology of the heart of the Orthopteran, Stenopelmatus. Physiosl. Zool. 22: 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florey, E. 1966. General and comparative animal physiology. Oliver and Boyd, Philadelphia and London.Google Scholar
Krijgsman, B. J. and Krijgsman-Berger, N. E.. 1951. Physiological investigations into the heart function of Arthropods. The heart of Periplaneta americana. Bull. ent. Res. 42: 143155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, J. E. 1967. Aging in an adult insect heart. Can. J. Zool. 45: 10731081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. 1968. Response of cockroach cardiac neurons to cholinergic compounds. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 17131717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Župančič, A. O. 1965. The equilibrium constant for the reaction between (+) — tubocurarine and the anionic centres of horse-plasma cholinesterase. Biochem. biophys. Acta 99: 325330.Google ScholarPubMed