Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:34:31.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphology of antennae of Dendroctonus vitei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), with special reference to sensilla clustered into pit craters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2018

María Fernanda López
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Variación Biológica y Evolución, Departamento de Zoología. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomás, México D.F., CP 11340, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Francisco Armendáriz-Toledano
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Variación Biológica y Evolución, Departamento de Zoología. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomás, México D.F., CP 11340, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Arnulfo Albores-Medina
Affiliation:
Departamento de Toxicología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, San Pedro Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Gerardo Zúñiga*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Variación Biológica y Evolución, Departamento de Zoología. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomás, México D.F., CP 11340, Ciudad de México, Mexico
*
1Corresponding author: (e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected])

Abstract

As reported recently by the authors, the third and fourth antennomeres of the antennal club of the bark beetle Dendroctonus vitei Wood (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) possess conoid sensilla clustered inside spherical or bulb-shaped invaginations of the cuticle that resemble geological pit craters. These structures are novel relative to other Dendroctonus Erichson species examined. The morphology and ultrastructure of different sensilla types on the antennal club and within the pit craters of D. vitei are herein described in detail with the aid of light, environmental scanning electron, and transmission electron microscopy. Five types of sensilla were found: fluted, basiconica type I, and trichodea types I, II, and III. The pit craters were composed of clusters of multiporous sensilla basiconica arising from the inner surface of the concavities, and the morphology and ultrasructure of these sensilla are consistent with an olfactory function. The presence of pit craters in the D. vitei on the anterior side of the antennal club is an diagnostic character for this species and an autapomorphy of great taxonomic importance within the Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann species complex.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Barbara Bentz

References

Altner, H. and Prillinger, L. 1980. Ultrastructure of invertebrate chemo-, thermo-, and hygroreceptors and its functional significance. International Review of Cytology, 67: 69139.Google Scholar
Armendáriz-Toledano, F., García-Román, J., López, M. F., Sullivan, B.T., and Zúñiga, G. 2017. New characters and redescription of Dendroctonus vitei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). The Canadian Entomologist, 149: 413433.Google Scholar
Armendáriz-Toledano, F., Niño, A., Macías-Sámano, J., and Zúñiga, G. 2014. Review of the geographical distribution of Dendroctonus vitei (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) based on geometric morphometrics of the seminal rod. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107: 748755.Google Scholar
Armendáriz-Toledano, F. and Zúñiga, G. 2017. Illustrated key to species of genus Dendroctonus (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) occurring in Mexico and Central America. Journal of Insect Science, 17: 115.Google Scholar
Bay, D.E. and Pitts, C.W. 1976. Antennal olfactory sensilla of the face fly, Musca autumnalis DeGeer (Diptera: Muscidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 5: 116.Google Scholar
Chen, H.B., Zhang, Z., Wang, H.B., and Kong, X.B. 2010. Antennal morphology and sensilla ultrastructure of Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), an invasive forest pest in China. Micron, 41: 735741.Google Scholar
Dickens, J.C. and Payne, T.L. 1977. Bark beetle olfaction: pheromone receptor system in Dendroctonus frontalis . Journal of Insect Physiology, 23: 481489.Google Scholar
Dickens, J.C. and Payne, T.L. 1978. Structure and function of the sensilla on the antennal club of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Zimmerman) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 7: 251265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, J.C., Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C., and Rudinsky, J.A. 1985. Multiple acceptors for pheromonal enantiomers on single olfactory cells in the douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Curculinidae: Scolytinae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 11: 13591370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, P.A., Vlimant, M., Guerenstein, P., and Guerin, P.M. 2007. Ultrastructure and receptor cell responses of the antennal grooved peg sensilla of Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Arthropod Structure and Development, 31: 271285.Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Luo, L., and Hammond, A. 2006. Antennal morphology, structure and sensilla distribution in Microplitis pallidipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Micron, 38: 684693.Google Scholar
Hallberg, E. 1982. Sensory organs in Ips typographus (Insecta: Coleoptera) fine structure of antennal sensilla. Protoplasma, 111: 206214.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A.D. 1909. Contributions toward a monograph of the scolytid beetles I. The genus Dendroctonus . United States Department of Agriculture Bureau of Entomology Technical Bulletin, 17: 1164.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.C. and Zacharuk, R.Y. 1991. The fine structure of uniporous and nonporous pegs on the distal antennal segment of the diving beetle Graphoderus occidentalis Horn (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69: 334352.Google Scholar
Keil, T. and Steinbrecht, A. 1984. Mechanosensitive and olfactory sensilla of insects. In Insect ultrastructure. Edited by R.C. King and H. Akai. Plenum Press, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 477516.Google Scholar
Lanier, G.N., Hendrichs, J.P., and Flores, J.E. 1988. Biosystematics of the Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) complex. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 81: 403418.Google Scholar
López, M.F., Armendáriz-Toledano, F., Macías Sámano, J., Shibayama-Salas, M., and Zúñiga, G. 2014. Comparative study of the antennae of Dendroctonus rhizophagus and Dendroctonus valens (Curculionidae: Scolytinae): sensilla types, distribution and club shape. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107: 11301143.Google Scholar
Lyon, R. L. 1958. Useful secondary sex character in Dendroctonus bark beetles. The Canadian Entomologist, 90: 552558.Google Scholar
Matthew, R.E.S. and Mark, A.E. 2004. The mode of pheromone evolution: evidence from bark beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 271: 839–846.Google Scholar
Moeck, H.A. 1968. Electron microscopic studies of antennal sensilla in the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliver) (Scolytidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46: 521556.Google Scholar
Payne, T.L., Moeck, H.A., Willson, C.D., Coulson, R.N., and Humphreys, W.J. 1973. Bark beetle olfaction-II. Antennal morphology of sixteen species of Scolytidae (Coleoptera). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 2: 177192.Google Scholar
Payne, T.L., Richerson, J.V., Dickens, J.C., West, J.R., Mori, K., Berisford, C.W., and Blum, M.S. 1982. Southern pine beetle: olfactory receptor and behavior discrimination of enantiomers of the attractant pheromone frontalin. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 8: 873881.Google Scholar
Ranger, C.M., Horst, L., Barnett, J., Reding, M.E., Anderson, B., and Krause, C.R. 2017. Comparative morphology and distribution of antennal sensilla on Xylosandrus germanus and Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 110: 172188.Google Scholar
Reinhard, J. 2004. Insect chemical communication. ChemoSense, 6: 16.Google Scholar
Steinbrecht, R.A. 1997. Pore structures in insect olfactory sensilla: a review of data and concepts. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 6: 229245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sureda, T., Quero, C., Bosch, M.P., Avilés, R., Coll, F., Renou, M., and Guerrero, A. 2006. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of a Cuban population of the sweet potato weevil to its sex pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32: 21772190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Víctor, J. and Zúñiga, G. 2016. Phylogeny of Dendroctonus bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) inferred from morphological and molecular data. Systematic Entomology, 41: 162177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J.P., Islas, S.F., Renwich, J.A.A., Hughes, P.R., and Kliefoth, R.A. 1974. Biochemical and biological variation of southern pine beetle population in North and Central America. Journal of Applied Entomology, 75: 422435.Google Scholar
Waldow, U. 1970. Electrophysiologische untersuchungen an Feuchte. Trockenund Kalterezeptoren auf der antennae der Wanderheusehrecke Locusta; Z. Vgle. Physiology, 69: 249283.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.T. 1981. Ultrastructure of sensilla of the female mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 10: 928.Google Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist, 6: 11359.Google Scholar
Yang, H., Yan, S.C., and Liu, D. 2009. Ultrastructural observations on antennal sensilla of Coleophora obducta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae). Micron, 40: 231238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacharuk, R.Y. 1980. Ultrastructure and function of chemosensilla. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 25: 2747.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R.Y. 1985. Antennae and sensilla. In Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Volume 6. Edited by G.A. Kerkut and L.I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 169.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, G., Mendoza Correa, M.G., Cisneros, R., and Salinas-Moreno, Y. 1999. Zonas de sobreposición en las áreas de distribución geográfica de las especies mexicanas de Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) y sus implicaciones ecologico- evolutivas. Acta Zoologica Mexicana, 77: 122.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, G., Salinas-Moreno, Y., and Cisneros, R. 1995. Coexistencia en simpatria de Dendroctonus frontalis Zimermann y Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) sobre un mismo hospedero. Acta Zoologica Mexicana, 64: 5962.Google Scholar