Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:13:48.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MORPHOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATIONS OF THE BUMBLE BEE SOCIAL PARASITE PSITHYRUS ASHTONI (CRESSON) (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Richard M. Fisher  and
Blair J. Sampson
Richard M. Fisher
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, CanadaB0P 1X0
Blair J. Sampson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, CanadaB0P 1X0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Psithyrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) are obligate social parasites of bumble bees (Bombus spp.). Morphological and physiological features of P. ashtoni (Cresson) females, which may facilitate the successful usurpation of host nests, were examined. Parasite females were no larger than B. terricola Kirby queens, although they possessed a number of protective modifications to the exoskeleton, as well as increased offensive armament, including larger mandibles and a longer venom gland. Females of P. ashtoni and P. insularis (Smith) possessed a greater number of ovarioles than host queens, and produced smaller eggs. The Dufour’s glands of the two Psithyrus species were significantly larger than those of B. terricola. There appears to have been considerable convergence in the evolution of socially parasitic lifestyles in bumble bees and wasps (Vespula spp.), presumably as a consequence of similar selective pressures operating on parasites belonging to these distantly related but socially similar taxa.

Résumé

Les Psithyrus spp. (Hymenoptera : Apidae) sont des parasites sociaux obligatoires des bourdons (Bombus spp.). Les caractéristiques morphologiques et physiologiques des femelles de P. ashtoni (Cresson) qui peuvent favoriser l’usurpation des nids de leurs hôtes ont fait l’objet d’une étude. Les femelles parasites ne sont pas plus grosses que les reines de B. terricola Kirby, mais leur exosquelette comporte plusieurs modifications protectrices et elles possèdent plus d’armes offensives, notamment des mandibules plus grandes et une glande à venim plus longue. Les femelles de P. ashtoni et de P. insularis (Smith) ont aussi un plus grand nombre d’ovarioles que les reines hôtes et produisent des oeufs plus petits. Les glandes de Dufour des deux espèces de Psithyrus sont significativement plus grandes que celles de B. terricola. Il semble y avoir eu beaucoup de convergence dans l’évolution du mode de vie des parasites sociaux chez les bourdons et les quêpes (Vespula spp.), probablement à la suite de pressions de sélection similaires opérées sur des parasites appartenant à des taxons peu apparentés, mais semblables par leur mode de vie social.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, B.A., and Rozen, J.G.. 1987. Ovaries, ovarioles and oocytes of parasitic bees. Pan-Pacific Ent. 63: 155–164.Google Scholar
Bourke, A.F.G. 1988. Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera. Quart. Rev. Biol. 63: 291–311.Google Scholar
Cumber, R.A. 1949. The biology of the humble-bees, with special reference to the production of the worker caste. Trans. R. ent. Soc. 100: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, R.M., Wheeler, J.W., and Eickwort, G.C.. 1984. Sociochemicals of bees. pp. 387–488 in Bell, W.J., and Carde, R.T. (Eds.), Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London. 524 pp.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.M. 1984. Dominance by a bumble bee social parasite (Psithyrus citrinus) over workers of its host (Bombus impatiens). Anim. Behav. 32: 303–304.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.M. 1987. Queen-worker conflict and social parasitism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Anim. Behav. 35: 1026–1036.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.M. 1988. Observations on the reproductive behaviours of three European species of cuckoo bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Insect Soc. 35: 341–354.Google Scholar
Greene, A., Akre, R.D., and Landolt, P.. 1978. Behavior of the yellowjacket social parasite, Dolichovespula arctica (Rohwer) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Melanderia 29: 1–28.Google Scholar
Ito, M., and Sakagami, S.F.. 1985. Possible synapomorphies of the parasitic bumblebees (Psithyrus) with some nonparasitic bumblebees (Bombus) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 10: 105–117.Google Scholar
Larsson, F.K. 1990. Female body size relationships with fecundity and egg size in two solitary species of fossorial Hymenoptera (Colletidae and Sphecidae). Ent. Gener. 15: 167–171.Google Scholar
Løken, A. 1973. Studies on Scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Norsk. ent. Tidskr. 20: 1–218.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.W. 1982. Social parasitism in yellowjackets (Vespula). pp. 193–202 in Jaisson, P. (Ed.), Social Insects in the Tropics. Vol. 1. Univ. Paris-Nord, Paris. 418 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.W., and Matthews, J.R.. 1979. War of the yellowjacket queens. Nat. Hist. 88: 56–65.Google Scholar
Medler, J.T. 1962. Morphometric studies on bumble bees. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55: 212–218.Google Scholar
Milliron, H.E., and Oliver, D.R.. 1966. Bumblebees from northern Ellesmere Island, with observations on usurpation by Megabombus hyperboreus (Schonh.). Can. Ent. 98: 207–213.Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, A., Varvio-Aho, S.-L., and Pamilo, P.. 1979. Evolutionary relationships in northern European Bombus and Psithyrus species (Hymenoptera: Apidae) studied on the basis of allozymes. Ann. ent. Fenn. 45: 77–80.Google Scholar
Plowright, R.C., and Jay, S.C.. 1977. On the size determination of bumble bee castes (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. J. Zool. 55: 1133–1138.Google Scholar
Plowright, R.C., and Owen, R.E.. 1980. The evolutionary significance of bumble bee color patterns: A mimetic interpretation. Evolution 34: 622–637.Google Scholar
Plowright, R.C., and Stephen, W.P.. 1978. A numerical taxonomic analysis of the evolutionary relationships of Bombus and Psithyrus. Can. Ent. 105: 733–743.Google Scholar
Reed, H.C., and Akre, R.D.. 1982. Morphological comparisons between the obligate social parasite, Vespula austriaca (Panzer), and its host, Vespula acadica (Sladen) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Psyche 89: 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, H.C., and Akre, R.D.. 1983. Usurpation behavior of the yellowjacket social parasite, Vespula austriaca (Panzer) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 110: 419–432.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W. 1927. The specific characters of the British humblebees (Hymenoptera). Trans. R. ent. Soc. 75: 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, H.C., and Akre, R.D.. 1961. The Social Insects. Harper Torchbooks, New York, NY. 219 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, K.W. 1986. Kin selection and the problem of sperm utilization in social insects. Nature 323: 798–800.Google Scholar
Salkeld, E.H. 1978. The chorionic structure of the eggs of some species of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombinae), and its use in taxonomy. Can. Ent. 110: 71–83.Google Scholar
Spradbery, J. 1973. Wasps. Sidgwick and Jackson, London. 408 pp.Google Scholar
Tengo, J., Hefetz, A., and Francke, W., 1990. Individual and group specific odors of bumble bee females, p. 513 in Veeresh, G.K., Mallik, B., and Viraktamath, C.A. (Eds.), Social Insects and the Environment. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi. 765 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. 548 pp.Google Scholar