Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:52:33.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO FORMS OF HYBOMITRA TYPHUS (DIPTERA: TABANIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Anne Hudson  and
H. J. Teskey
Anne Hudson
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
H. J. Teskey
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two forms of Hybomitra typhus (Whitney) flying together have been collected from Ontario bogs. The two forms have been clearly segregated by size and colour characters and also by differences in the appearance of esterase isozymes shown by electrophoresis. The combined data indicate that insects recorded as H. typhus comprise more than one species.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 7 , July 1976 , pp. 737 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avise, J. C. 1974. Systematic value of electrophoretic data. Syst. Zool. 23: 465–481.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J. and Powell, J. R.. 1972 a. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. VI. Levels of polymorphism and the physiological function of enzymes. Biochem. Genet. 7: 331–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayala, F. J. and Powell, J. R.. 1972 b. Allozymes as diagnostic characters of sibling species of Drosophila. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 69: 1094–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayala, F. J. and Tracey, M. L.. 1973. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. VIII. Genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation between two subspecies. J. Heredity 64: 120–124.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J. and Tracey, M. L.. 1974. Genetic differentiation within and between species of the Drosophila willistoni group. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 71: 999–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubby, J. L. and Lewontin, R. C.. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. I. The number of alleles at different loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54: 577–594.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. and Hubby, J. L.. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54: 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechuman, L. L. 1972. The horse flies and deer flies of New York (Diptera, Tabanidae). Search (Cornell Univ.) (6) 2: 1–72.Google Scholar
Pechuman, L. L., Teskey, H. J., and Davies, D. M.. 1961. The Tabanidae (Diptera) of Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 91: 77–121.Google Scholar
Teskey, H. J. 1969. Larvae and pupae of some eastern North American Tabanidae (Diptera). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 63. 147 pp.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. P. and Selander, R. K.. 1974. Isozymes in insects and their significance. A. Rev. Ent. 19: 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar