Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:53:28.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A MODEL OF PREDATION BY PODISUS MACULIVENTRIS (SAY) ON MEXICAN BEAN BEETLE, EPILACHNA VARIVESTIS MULSANT, IN SOYBEANS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert J. O’Neil
Robert J. O’Neil
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model of predation by Podisus maculiventris (Say) on Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant, larvae in soybeans is presented. The attack equation described the number of prey attacked as a function of the number of prey, soybean leaf area, and the search behavior of the predator. The area searched by P. maculiventris was related to the amount of leaf area and the number of prey. Predictions of the number of Mexican bean beetles attacked per predator were compared with an independent field data set. The relevance of the predation model to studies of predation in other agricultural systems is discussed.

Résumé

On a élaboré un modèle de la prédation de Podisus maculiventris sur les larves de la coccinelle mexicaine des haricots, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant dans le soya. L’équation d’attaque présentée prédit le nombre de proies attaquées en fonction du nombre de proies, de la surface foliaire du soya, et des caractéristiques de la recherche du prédateur. L’aire de recherche de P. maculiventris est reliée à la surface foliaire et au nombre de proies. Les prévisions obtenues du nombre de coccinelles attaquées ont été comparées avec des données de terrain indépendantes. On discute de la pertinence du modèle de prédation pour d’autres systèmes agricoles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 7 , July 1988 , pp. 601 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beddington, J.R. 1975. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, L.L., Rabb, R.L., VanDuyn, J.W., Brooks, W.M., Bradley, J.R. Jr., and Stinner, R.E.. 1980. A guide to the identification and biology of soybean arthropods in North Carolina. N.C. State Tech. Bull. 238.Google Scholar
Drummond, F.A., James, R.L., Casagrande, R.A., and Faubert, H.. 1984. Development and survival of Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), a predator of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Ent. 13: 1283–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsey, K.D. 1972. Predation of eggs of Heliothis spp. on Tobacco. Environ. Ent. 1: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E.W. 1982. Feeding specialization in predator insects: hunting and attack behavior of two stinkbug species (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 108: 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, B.D., and Gilbert, N.. 1976. Coccinellids and aphids: A quantitative study of the impact of adult ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Hemoptera: Aphidae). J. ent. Soc. Brit. Col. 73: 33–56.Google Scholar
Hassell, M.P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey Systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. 234 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Holling, C.S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Ent. 91: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C.S. 1961. Principles of insect predation. Annu. Rev. Ent. 6: 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, R.F. 1985. Principles of arthropod predation. pp. 497–530 in Huffaker, C.B., and Rabb, R.L. (Eds.), Ecological Entomology. J. Wiley and Sons, New York. 844 pp.Google Scholar
Marston, N.L., Schmidt, G.T., Biever, K.D., and Dickerson, W.A.. 1978. Reaction of five species of soybean caterpillar to attack by the predator, Podisus maculiventris. Environ. Ent. 7: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J.E. 1980. A list of prey species of Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Great Lakes Ent. 13: 17–24.Google Scholar
Morris, R.F. 1963. The effect of age and prey defense on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris Say to the density of Hyphantria cunea Drury. Can. Ent. 95: 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerji, M.K., and LeRoux, E.J.. 1965. Laboratory rearing of a Quebec strain of the pentatomid predator Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Phytoprotect. 46: 40–60.Google Scholar
Mukerji, M.K., and LeRoux, E.J.. 1969. The effect of predator age on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris to the prey size of Galleria mellonella. Can. Ent. 101: 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naranjo, S.E., and Stimac, J.L.. 1987. Plant influences on predation and oviposition by Geocoris punctipes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) in soybeans. Environ. Ent. 16: 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R.J. 1988. Predation by Podisus maculiventris (Say) on Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant, in Indiana soybeans. Can. Ent. 120: 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, R.J., and Stimac, J.L.. 1988 a. Measurement and analysis of arthropod predation on velvetbean caterpillar, Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in soybeans. Environ. Ent. In press.Google Scholar
O'Neil, R.J., and Stimac, J.L.. 1988 b. A model of arthropod predation in soybeans. Environ. Ent. In press.Google Scholar
O'Neil, R.J., and Wiedenmann, R.N.. 1987. Adaptations of arthropod predators to agricultural systems. Fla. Ent. 70: 41–48.Google Scholar
Risch, S.J., Wrubel, R., and Andow, D.. 1982. Foraging by a predaceous beetle, Coleomegella maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), in a polyculture: effects of plant density and diversity. Environ. Ent. 11: 949–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 1985. User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. 956 pp.Google Scholar
Stevens, L.A., Steinhauer, A.L., and Elden, T.C.. 1975. Laboratory rearing of the Mexican bean beetle and the parasite Pedeobius foveolatus, with emphasis on parasite longevity. Environ. Ent. 3: 985–988.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R. 1984. Assessing and interpreting the spatial distributions of insect populations. Annu. Rev. Ent. 29: 321–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnipseed, S., and Kogan, M.. 1983. Soybean pests and indigenous natural enemies. pp. 1–6 in Pitre, H.N. (Ed.), Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests in Soybeans. S. Coop. Ser. Bull. 285.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G.C. 1943. Some aspects of parasitism in field populations of Plutella maculipennis Curt. J. ent Soc. S. Afr. 6: 65–80.Google Scholar
Waddill, V., and Shepard, M.. 1975. A comparison of predation by the pentatomids, Podisus maculiventris (Say) and Striretus anchoraga (F.) on the Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 1023–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walde, S.J., and Murdoch, W.W.. 1988. Spatial density dependence in parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Ent. 33: 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitcomb, W.H. 1974. Natural populations of entomophagous arthropods and their effect on the agroecosystem. pp. 150–169in Maxwell, F.G., and Harris, F.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Summer Institute on Biological Control of Plant, Insects and Diseases. University Press, Jackson, MS.Google Scholar