Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:35:52.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MIGRATION FLIGHT BY AN APHID, RHOPALOSIPHUM MAIDIS (HEMIPTERA: APHIDIDAE), AND A NOCTUID, SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. H. Rose ,
R. H. Silversides  and
O. H. Lindquist
A. H. Rose
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
R. H. Silversides
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
O. H. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An instance of medium-range migration by Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) and of long-range migration by Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) are documented and the weather systems that made the migrations possible are detailed. Although both species were carried beyond their northern limit for overwinter survival and little damage ensued, the usefulness of synoptic weather analysis in explaining sudden population increases is shown.

Résumé

Les auteurs présentent un cas de migration moyenne par Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) et de migration étendue par Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) et, en plus, un rapport détaillé des conditions météorologiques nécessaires aux migrations. Bien que les deux espèces aient été portées au-delà de la limite septentrionale de leur répartition, elles ont survécu l’hiver sans grands dommages. Les auteurs montrent l’utilité de la météorologie synoptique pour expliquer un accroissement soudain de population.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 6 , June 1975 , pp. 567 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1973 a. In Co-op. econ. Insect Rep. 23(32): 528. Pl. Prot. Quar. Prog., Anim. Pl. Hlth Insp. Serv., USDA.Google Scholar
Anon. 1973 b. In Co-op. econ. Insect Rep. 23(33): 552. Pl. Prot. Quar. Prog., Anim. Pl. Hlth Insp. Serv., USDA.Google Scholar
Anon. 1973 c. In Co-op. econ. Insect Rep. 23(34): 587. Pl. Prot. Quar. Prog., Anim. Pl. Hlth Insp. Serv., USDA.Google Scholar
Anon. 1973 d. In Co-op. econ. Insect Rep. 23(35): 606. Pl. Prot. Quar. Prog., Anim. Pl. Hlth Insp. Serv., USDA.Google Scholar
Anon. 1973 e. In Co-op. econ. Insect Rep. 23(36): 612. Pl. Prot. Quar. Prog., Anim. Pl. Hlth Insp. Serv., USDA.Google Scholar
Berry, R. E. and Taylor, L. R.. 1968. High altitude migration of aphids in maritime and continental climates. J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, B. P. 1971. Pest insects of annual crop plants in Canada. l. Lepidoptera. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 78.Google Scholar
Brown, C. E. 1965. Mass transport of forest tent caterpillar moths, Malacosoma disstria Hübner, by a cold front. Can. Ent. 97(10): 1073–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S. and Swaine, G.. 1966. New evidence on the migration of moths of the African armyworm Spodoptera exempta Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. ent. Res. 56: 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claycomb, G. B. 1954. Notes on the habit of a moth Laphygma frugiperda (Smith and Abbot). Proc. La Acad. Sci. 17: 50–51.Google Scholar
French, R. A. 1968. Migration of Laphygma exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to the British Isles in relation to large-scale weather systems. J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1957. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spruce budworm. II. The role of dispersal. Can. J. Zool. 35: 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halgren, L. A. and Taylor, L. R.. 1968. Factors affecting flight responses of alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. and Shizaphis graminum Rodani (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, W. R. 1951. Mass flights of the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 83(9): 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, W. R. and Waggoner, P. E.. 1965. Transport of small organisms in moving air. Meteorol. Monogr. 6(28): 133–137.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. 1963. Physiological factors in insect migration by flight. Nature 4879: 423–427.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. 1969. Migration and dispersal of insects by flight. Methuen, London. 763 pp.Google Scholar
Luginbill, P. 1928. The fall armyworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 34. 91 pp.Google Scholar
Medler, J. T. 1960. Long range displacement of Homoptera in the central United States. Proc. XI int. Congr. Ent. (Vienna) 3: 30–35.Google Scholar
Orlob, G. B. and Medler, J. T.. 1961. Biology of cereal and grass aphids in Wisconsin (Homoptera). Can. Ent. 93: 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sippell, W. L., Dance, W. B., and Rose, A. H.. 1966. In A. Rep. For. Insect Dis. Surv. 1965. Can. Dep. For., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Sippell, W. L., Rose, A. H., and Gross, H. L.. 1970. In A. Rep. For. Insect Dis. Surv. 1969. Can. Dep. Fish. For., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Sippell, W. L., Gross, H. L., and Rose, A. H.. 1971. In A. Rep. For. Insect Dis. Surv. 1970. Can. Dep. Fish. For., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Sippell, W. L., Rose, A. H., and Gross, H. L.. 1972. In A. Rep. For. Insect Dis. Surv. 1971. Can. Dep. Environ., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Urquhart, F. A. 1960. The monarch butterfly. Univ. Toronto Press. 361 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1945 a. Conditions governing the distribution of insects in the free atmosphere. Introduction. Can. Ent. 77: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1945 b. Conditions governing the distribution of insects in the free atmosphere. III. Thermal convection. Can. Ent. 77: 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. 1930. The migration of butterflies. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 473 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. 1958. Insect migration. Collins, London. 235 pp.Google Scholar