Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:37:28.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) injury to Brassicaceae in field trials in northeastern Saskatchewan, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2018

Lars Andreassen ,
Juliana Soroka ,
Larry Grenkow ,
Owen Olfert  and
Rebecca H. Hallett
Lars Andreassen
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Juliana Soroka*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Larry Grenkow
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Owen Olfert
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Rebecca H. Hallett
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
*
2 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To determine resistance of Brassicaceae field crops to Contarinia Róndani (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) midge complex (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer and Contarinia undescribed species), field trials of two different host assemblages were undertaken near Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada in 2014 and repeated in 2015. In both years the first midge adults appeared in early July, when most plants were starting to flower, and a second generation occurred in mid-August, past the period of crop susceptibility. In a trial studying 18 lines of six brassicaceous species, the lowest probability of midge injury was found on Camelina sativa (Linnaeus) Crantz lines in both years. No differences were found in the probability of midge injury among any of the 13 Brassica Linnaeus species lines tested, including commercial glyphosate-resistant and glufosinate-resistant Brassica napus Linnaeus canola lines, Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata Braun), brown or oriental mustard (Brassica juncea (Linnaeus) Czernajew), or Polish canola (Brassica rapa Linnaeus) lines. Probability of midge injury on Sinapis alba Linnaeus yellow mustard lines reached levels between those on Camelina sativa lines and those on Brassica lines. A second trial examining 14 current commercial glyphosate-resistant Brassica napus canola cultivars found no differences in susceptibility to midge feeding among any cultivars tested. More plants were damaged in 2015 in both studies, and damage reached maximum levels earlier in 2015 than in 2014.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 150 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 637 - 651
Copyright
© 2018 Entomological Society of Canada. Parts of this are a work of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: P.O. Box 97, Dunrea, Manitoba, R0K 0S0, Canada

References

Åhman, I. 1982. A comparison between high and low glucosinolate cultivars of summer oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) with regard to their levels of infestation by the brassica pod midge (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 94: 103–109.Google Scholar
Alahakoon, U., Adamson, J., Grenkow, L., Soroka, J., Bonham-Smith, P., and Gruber, M. 2016. Field growth traits and insect-host plant interactions of two transgenic canola (Brassicaceae) lines with elevated trichome numbers. The Canadian Entomologist, 148: 603–615.Google Scholar
Alford, D.V., Nillson, C., and Ulber, B. 2003. Insect pests of oilseed rape crops. In Biocontrol of oilseed rape pests. Edited by D.V. Alford. Blackwell Science, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 9–41.Google Scholar
Andersson, G. and Olsson, G. 1950. Feldversuche mit Leindotter – Camelina sativa Crantz. Sveriges Utsaedesfoerengen Tidskrift, 60: 455–458.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F. 1946. Gall midges of economic importance. I. Gall midges of root and vegetable crops. Crosby Lockwood & Son, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F. 1950. The identity of the swede midge (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer), with notes on its biology. Annals of Applied Biology, 37: 241–248.Google Scholar
Berhow, M.A., Polat, U., Glinski, J.A., Glensk, M., Vaughn, S.F., Isbell, T., et al. 2013. Optimized analysis and quantification of glucosinolates from Camelina sativa seeds by reverse-phase liquid chromatography. Industrial Crops and Products, 43: 119–125.Google Scholar
Bohinc, T. and Trdan, S. 2013. Environmental factors affecting the glucosinolate content in Brassicaceae. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10: 357–360.Google Scholar
Brown, P.D., Tokuhisa, J.G., Reichelt, M., and Gershenzon, J. 2003. Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana . Phytochemistry, 62: 471–481.Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2008. Swede midge – Contarinia nasturtii. Fact sheet [online]. Available from www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/pestrava/connas/connase.shtml [accessed 29 December 2017].Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2009. Review of the pest status of the swede midge (Contarinia nasturtii) in Canada [online]. RMD-08-03. Available from www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/plant-pests-invasive-species/directives/risk-management/rmd-08-03/eng/1304794114305/1304822057238 [accessed 29 December 2017].Google Scholar
Canola Council of Canada. 2017. Canadian canola harvested acreage. Markets and stats. [online] Available from www.canolacouncil.org/markets-stats/statistics/harvest-acreage [accessed 5 December 2017].Google Scholar
Carneiro, M.A., Branco, C.S., Braga, C.E., Almada, E.D., Costa, M.B., Maia, V.C., and Fernandes, G.W. 2009. Are gall midge species (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) host plant specialists? Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53: 365–378.Google Scholar
Chen, M., Shelton, A.M., Wang, P., Hoepting, C.A., Kain, W.C., and Brainard, D.C. 2009. Occurrence of the new invasive insect, Contarinia nasturtii, on cruciferous weeds. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 115–120.Google Scholar
Chew, F.S. 1988. Biological effects of glucosinolates. In Biologically active natural products. Edited by H.G. Cutler. American Chemical Society, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America. Pp. 155–181.Google Scholar
del Carmen Martínez-Ballesta, M., Moreno, D.A., and Carvaja, M. 2013. The physiological importance of glucosinolates on plant response to abiotic stress in Brassica . International Journal of Molecular Science, 14: 11607–11625.Google Scholar
Demirel, N. and Cranshaw, W. 2006. Relative attraction of color traps to western black flea beetle, Phyllotreta pusilla Horn (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera), on spring canola in Colorado. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9: 277–280.Google Scholar
Dry, F.W. 1915. An attempt to measure the local and seasonal abundance of the swede midge in parts of Yorkshire over the years 1912 to 1914. Annals of Applied Biology, 2: 81–108.Google Scholar
Ellis, W.N. 2014. Leafminers and plant galls of Europe [online]. Available from http://bladmineerders.nl/parasites/animalia/arthropoda/insecta/diptera/nematocera/cecidomyiidae/cecidomyiinae/cecidomyiidi/cecidomyiini/contarinia/contarinia-nasturtii [accessed 29 December 2017].Google Scholar
Fahey, J.W., Zalcmann, A.T., and Talalay, P. 2001. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry, 56: 5–51.Google Scholar
Giamoustaris, A. and Mithen, R. 1995. The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape Brassica napus ssp. oleifera on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. Annals of Applied Biology, 126: 347–363.Google Scholar
Giamoustaris, A. and Mithen, R. 1996. The effect of flower colour and glucosinolates on the interaction between oilseed rape and pollen beetles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 80: 206–208.Google Scholar
Halkier, B.A. and Gershenzon, J. 2006. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57: 303–333.Google Scholar
Hallett, R.H. 2007. Host plant susceptibility to the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100: 1335–1343.Google Scholar
Hallett, R.H. 2017. The challenge of swede midge management in canola. In Integrated management of insect pests on canola and other Brassica oilseed crops. Edited by G.V. Reddy. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp. 44–67.Google Scholar
Hallett, R.H., Goodfellow, S.A., and Heal, J.D. 2007. Monitoring and detection of the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 700–712.Google Scholar
Hallett, R.H., Goodfellow, S.A., Weiss, R.M., and Olfert, O. 2009. MidgEmerge, a new predictive tool, indicates the presence of multiple emergence phenotypes of the overwintered generation of swede midge. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 130: 81–97.Google Scholar
Hallett, R.H. and Heal, J.D. 2001. First Nearctic record of the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a pest of cruciferous crops from Europe. The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 713–715.Google Scholar
Harper, F.R. and Berkenkamp, B. 1975. Revised growth-stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus . Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 55: 657–658.Google Scholar
Henderson, A.E., Hallett, R.H., and Soroka, J.J. 2004. Prefeeding behavior of the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae, on host and nonhost crucifers. Journal of Insect Behavior, 17: 17–39.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R.J., van Dam, N.M., and van Loon, J.J.A. 2009. Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology, 54: 57–83.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1888. Beiträge zur kentniss der gallmücken. Entomologische Nachrichten, 17: 263–264.Google Scholar
Kolesik, P. 1993. Basic bionomics of the lentil gall midge (Contarinis lentis Aczel) (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 116: 371–380.Google Scholar
Onyilagha, J.C., Gruber, M.H., Hallett, R.H., Holowachuk, J., and Soroka, J.J. 2012. Constitutive flavonoids deter flea beetle insect feeding in Camelina sativa . Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 42: 128–133.Google Scholar
Pachagounder, P., Lamb, R.J., and Bodnaryk, R.P. 1998. Resistance to the flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in false flax Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae). The Canadian Entomologist, 130: 235–240.Google Scholar
Palaniswamy, P. and Lamb, R.J. 1992. Host preferences of the flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae and P. striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), for crucifer seedlings. Journal of Economic Entomology, 85: 743–752.Google Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Lamb, R.J., and McVetty, P.B.E. 1992. Screening for antixenosis resistance to flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae), in rapeseed and related crucifers. The Canadian Entomology, 124: 895̶–8906.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. 2015. President’s message. In Ontario Canola Growers Association January 2015 Newsletter. Ontario Canola Growers Association, Markdale, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Rakhmaninov, A.N. and Vuirzhikovskaya, A.V. 1930. On Ceuthorhynchus syrites Germ., a pest of Camelina sativa . Report on Applied Entomology, 1930: 345–350. [English abstract].Google Scholar
Readshaw, J.L. 1966. The ecology of the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Kieffer) (Diptera; Cecidomyiidae). I. Life-history and influence of temperature and moisture on development. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 56: 685–700.Google Scholar
Sang, J.P., Minchinton, I.R., Johnstone, P.K., and Truscott, R.J.W. 1984. Glucosinolate profiles in the seed, root, and leaf tissue of cabbage, mustard, rapeseed, radish and swede. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 64: 77–93.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2010. SAS/STAT for Windows, Version 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Soroka, J and Grenkow, L. 2013. Susceptibility of brassicaceous plants to feeding by flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 2557–2567.Google Scholar
Soroka, J., Olivier, C., Grenkow, L., and Seguin-Swartz, G. 2015. Interactions between Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) and insect pests of canola. The Canadian Entomologist, 147: 193–214.Google Scholar
Soroka, J.J., Olivier, C., Wist, T.J., and Grenkow, L. 2017. Present and potential impacts of insects on camelina and crambe. In Integrated management of insect pests on canola and other Brassica oilseed crops. Edited by G.V. Reddy. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp. 316–340.Google Scholar
Stokes, B.M. 1953a. The host plant range of the swede midge (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer) with special reference to types of plant damage. Tijdschrift over plantenziekten, 59: 82–90.Google Scholar
Stokes, B.M. 1953b. Biological investigations into the validity of Contarinia species living on Cruciferae, with special reference to the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Kieffer). Annals of Applied Biology, 40: 726–741.Google Scholar
Variyar, P.S., Banerjee, A., Akkarakaran, J.J., and Suprasanna, P. 2014. Role of glucosinolates in plant stress tolerance. In Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance, volume 1. Biological techniques. Edited by P. Ahmad and S. Rasool. Elsvier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Pp. 271–291.Google Scholar
Vincent, C. and Stewart, R.K. 1986. Influence of trap color on captures of adult crucifer-feeding flea beetles. Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 3: 120–124.Google Scholar
Williams, J.L. and Hallett, R.H. 2017. Oviposition preference, larval distribution and impact of the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii, on growth and yield of canola. Journal of Pest Science, 91: 551–563.Google Scholar
Yukawa, J. and Rohfritsch, O. 2005. Biology and ecology of gall-inducing Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). In Biology, ecology, and evolution of gall-inducing arthropods, volume 1. Edited by A. Raman, C.W. Schaefer, and T.M. Withers. Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, United States of America. Pp. 273–304.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Andreassen et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Andreassen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 53.2 KB