Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:36:09.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE MECHANISM OF SPERM PRECEDENCE IN THE SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Arthur Retnakaran
Arthur Retnakaran
Affiliation:
Insect Pathology Research Institute, Canadian Forestry ServiceSault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mechanism of sperm precedence in the spruce budworm was studied using a genetic marker. When female moths with red-eyes, a recessive trait, are mated twice within a day, first with a red-eyed male followed by a black-eyed male, three types of offspring were observed in the F1 generation. Some females produced only red-eyed offspring; another group produced only black-eyed progeny; a third group produced a mixture of both types. This indicates that sperms received from either or both matings may be utilized. The time interval between successive sperm transfers appears to be the underlying factor that determines sperm precedence in this insect; a hypothesis to explain this phenomenon is presented.

Résumé

Au moyen de marques génétiques, l’auteur étudia le mécanisme de précédence de sperme chez la Tordeuse des bourgeons de l’épinette. Lorsque des adultes femelles à yeux rouges (trait récessif) furent accouplées deux fois le même jour, d’abord avec un male aux yeux rouges puis avec un mâle aux yeux noirs, trois types de rejetons furent observés lors de la génération F1. Quelques femelles produisirent seulement des rejetons aux yeux rouges; d’autres seulement des rejetons aux yeux noirs, et d’autres produisirent un mélange des deux types. Ce résultat indique les spermes de l’un ou l’autre accouplement peuvent être utilisés. L’intervale de temps entre les transferts successifs de sperme semble le facteur de base qui préside à la précédence de sperme chez cet insecte et l’auteur fournit une hypothèse visant à expliquer ce phénomène.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 11 , November 1974 , pp. 1189 - 1194
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

References

Campbell, I. M. 1961. Polygyny in Choristoneura Led. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 93: 1160–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, G. B. Jr., 1967. Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science 156: 1499–1501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doane, C. C. 1968. Aspects of mating behavior of the gypsy moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, F. 1970. The physiology of insect reproduction. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Grisdale, D. 1970. An improved laboratory method for rearing large numbers of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1111–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, M. 1972. Insect sex pheromones. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labline, P. A. 1966. The population biology of the butterfly, Euphydrayas editha. IV. Sperm precedence. Evolution 20: 580–586.Google Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 97: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. 1967. Polyandry in spruce budworm. Can. Dep. For. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 24: 6–7.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1970. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Can. Ent. 102: 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. 1971 a. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the female spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. 1971 b. Aspects of mating in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1121–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1970 a. Preliminary results of radiation induced sterility of the male spruce budworm. Can. Dep. For. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 26: 13–14.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1970 b. Metepa as a chemosterilant for the adult male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1394–1395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Retnakaran, A. 1970 c. The male reproductive system of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). I. Spermatogenesis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 851–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1971 a. A method for determining sperm precedence in insects. J. econ. Ent. 64: 578–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1971 b. Thiotepa as an effective agent for mass sterilizing the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1753–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S.. 1972. Factors affecting calling by female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1751–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehr, G. 1953. A mutation of eye color in Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Can. Dep. Agr. Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. 9: 6.Google Scholar
Stehr, G. 1954. A laboratory method for rearing the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 86: 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrecht, R. A. 1964. Die abhängigkeit der lockwirkung des sexualduftorgans weiblicher seidenspinner (Bombyx mori) von alter und kopulation. Z. vergl. Physiol, 48: 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar