Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:15:48.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MATING BEHAVIOR IN RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE): III. MALE AGGREGATION IN RESPONSE TO AN ARRESTANT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Ronald J. Prokopy
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin
Guy L. Bush
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin

Abstract

Male apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), were present on ceresin wax domes (the site of oviposition and the site of assembly for mating) in much greater relative frequency when caged with 1 or more females or with several other males than when caged alone. Field and laboratory experiments subsequently revealed that a principal stimulus eliciting this greater degree of male assembly was an unidentified chemical(s) deposited on the surface of apples and ceresin domes by both sexes (but in greater amount by mature females) causing arriving males to spend up to twice as much time there as on untreated fruit. The presence of the chemical did not elicit any greater attraction of males to the fruit. The consequence of the longer male residency on domes with the chemical was male aggregation and an ensuant higher frequency of mutual encounter and attempted copulation than on untreated domes. While the chemical acts to arrest males, we theorize that mere detection of its presence may be sufficient to cause males to remain in the vicinity and watch for females.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Féron, M. 1959. Attraction chimique du mâle de Ceratitis capitata Wied. (Dipt. Trypetidae) pour la femelle. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 248: 24032404.Google Scholar
Fletcher, B. S. 1968. Storage and release of a sex pheromone by the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni (Diptera: Trypetidae). Nature 219: 631632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlson, P. and Butenandt, A.. 1959. Pheromones (ectohormones) in insects. A. Rev. Ent. 4: 3958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, G. 1967. Laboratory observations on the mating behavior of the island fruit fly Rioxa pornia (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Aust. ent. Soc. 6: 127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. 1968. Visual responses of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae): Orchard studies. Ent. exp. appl. 11: 403422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Bennett, E. W., and Bush, G. L.. 1971 a. Mating behavior in Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae). Can. Ent. 103: 14051409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Bennett, E. W., and Bush, G. L.. 1971 b. Mating behavior in Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae). II. Temporal organization. Can. Ent. 104: 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Boller, E. F.. 1970. Artificial egging system for European cherry fruit fly. J. econ. Ent. 63: 14131417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Séguy, E. 1951. Trypetidae. In P. P. Grassé, Traité de Zoologie, T. X, p. 684. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Schultz, G. A. and Boush, G. M.. 1971. Suspected sex pheromone glands in three economically important species of Dacus. J. econ. Ent. 64: 347349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar