Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:19:19.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life history of Neoplasta parahebes (Diptera: Empididae: Hemerodromiinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

J. Robert Harkrider
J. Robert Harkrider
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Cypress College, Cypress, California 90630, United States of America (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The life history of Neoplasta parahebes MacDonald and Turner in a mountain stream in Southern California is reported. Female N. parahebes were separated from sympatric female Neoplasta hebes Melander by ovipositor morphology. Adults readily fed on adult midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) smaller than themselves. Ovarioles of gravid females contained an average of 74.8 eggs. Mating occurred in a unidirectional position. Females oviposited under the bark of submerged decaying wood. Eggs averaged 459 μm × 115 μm in size; most were laid within a 24 h period and, at room temperature, hatched in 10–11 days. There are three larval instars. Densities of larval N. parahebes were as high as 9.2 per 100 cm2 of wood surface in submerged dead tree branches. Branches also contained larvae of Orthocladius lignicola Kieffer, a wood-boring chironomid; larval N. parahebes readily fed on the midge larvae in their tunnels. Pupation occurred in the decaying wood.

Résumé

Ce travail décrit le cycle biologique de Neoplasta parahebes MacDonald et Turner dans un cours d'eau de montagne du sud de la Californie. La morphologie de l'ovipositeur permet de séparer les femelles de N. parahebes de celles de N. hebes Melander qui vivent dans le même milieu. Les adultes se nourrissent volontiers de moucherons (Diptera : Chironomidae) de taille plus petite que la leur. Les ovarioles des femelles gravides contiennent en moyenne 74,8 œufs. L'accouplement se fait en position unidirectionnelle. Les femelles pondent sous l'écorce de bois submergé et en décomposition. Les œufs ont une taille moyenne de 459 μm × 115 μm; ils sont pour la plupart pondus sur une période de moins de 24 h et, à la température de la pièce, ils éclosent en 10–11 jours. Il y a trois stades larvaires. Les densités de larves de N. parahebes peuvent atteindre 9,2 par 100 cm2 de surface de bois sur des branches submergées d'arbres morts. Les branches portent aussi des larves d'Orthocladius lignicola Kieffer, un chironomide mineur du bois; les larves de N. parahebes se nourrissent volontiers des larves du moucheron dans leur tunnel. La nymphose a lieu dans le bois en décomposition.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 143 , Issue 4 , August 2011 , pp. 392 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brammer, C.A.Harkrider, J.R.MacDonald, J.F. 2009. Differentiation of larvae and pupae of aquatic genera of Neartic Hemerodromiinae (Diptera: Empididae). Zootaxa, 2069: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, J.E. 1933 Diptera of Patagonia and Southern Chile based mainly on material in the British Museum (Natural History). Part 4, Empididae. The Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Cumming, J.M.Cooper, B.E. 1993. Techniques for obtaining adult-associated immature stages of predacious tachydromiine flies (Diptera: Empidoidea), with implications for rearing and biocontrol. Entomological News, 104: 93–101.Google Scholar
Harkrider, J.R. 2000a. Phenology of aquatic dance flies (Diptera: Empididae Hemerodromiinae) along a stream in Southern California. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 76: 170–175.Google Scholar
Harkrider, J.R. 2000b. Predation of larval Neoplasta Coquillett (Diptera: Empididae) on larval midges in the genus Rheotanytarsus Bause (Diptera: Chironomidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 76: 176–183.Google Scholar
Harper, P.P. 1980. Phenology and distribution of aquatic dance flies (Diptera: Empididae) in a Laurentian watershed. American Midland Naturalist, 104: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, B.Harper, P.P. 1985. The aquatic dance fly fauna of a subarctic river system in Québec, with the description of a new species of Hemerodromia (Diptera: Empididae). The Canadian Entomologist, 117: 1379–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J.F.Harkrider, J.R. 1999. Differentiation of larvae of Metachela Coquillett and Neoplasta Coquillett (Diptera: Empididae; Hemerodromiinae) based on larval rearing, external morphology, and ribosomal DNA fragment size. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 18: 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J.F.Turner, W.J. 1993. Review of the genus Neoplasta Coquillett of America north of Mexico (Diptera: Empididae; Hemerodromiinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 95: 351–376.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology-adults. In Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol 1. Edited by McAlpine, J.F.Peterson, B.V.Shewell, G.E.Teskey, H.J.Vockeroth, J.R.Wood, D.W.. Research Branch Agriculture Canada Monograph No. 27: Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 9–63.Google Scholar
Melander, A.L. 1927. Diptera, Family Empididae. In Genera Insectorum, fascicle 185. Wytsman, P. Louis Desmet-Verteneuil, Brussels, Belgium. pp. 1–434.Google Scholar
Melander, A.L. 1947. Synopsis of the Hemerodrominnae (Diptera, Empididae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 55: 237–273.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B.J.Harkrider, J.R. 2004. The immature stages and rearing observations of the aquatic dance fly, Roederiodes wirthi Chillcott (Diptera: Empididae: Clinocerinae), with taxonomic notes on the genus. Studia Dipterologica, 11: 51–61.Google Scholar
Smith, K.G.V. 1962. Studies on the Brazilian Empididae (Diptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 114: 195–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R.H. 1997. Diptera Empididae, Dance Flies. In Aquatic Insects of North Europe: a taxonomic handbook, Vol. 2: Edited by Nilsson, A.N.. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark. pp. 333–344.Google Scholar