Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:46:13.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LABORATORY BIOASSAY OF THE SEX PHEROMONE OF THE FEMALE EASTERN SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. J. Sanders
C. J. Sanders
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple and inexpensive olfactometer based on that of Gaston and Shorey (1964) is described for bioassaying the sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm. The number of males buzzing (rapidly beating their wings while circling on the substrate) after the introduction of the sample into the airstream of the olfactometer was used as measure of response. Males held under continuous illumination showed maximum response when 2 to 3 days old. Under natural lighting males showed a circadian rhythm, with peak response shortly after dark and a minor peak in mid-morning. Since per cent response under continuous illumination exceeded the maximum response under natural lighting, it is recommended that bioassays be carried out with 2- to 3-day-old males held under continuous illumination.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 5 , May 1971 , pp. 631 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartell, R. J. and Shorey, H. H.. 1969 a. A quantitative bioassay for the sex pheromone of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera) and factors limiting male responsiveness. J. Insect physiol. 15: 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartell, R. J. and Shorey, H. H.. 1969 b. Pheromone concentrations required to elicit successive steps in the mating sequence of males of the light-brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62: 1206–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beroza, M. and Jacobson, M., 1963. Chemical insect attractants. Wld Rev. Pest Control 2: 36–48.Google Scholar
Butt, B. A. and Hathaway, D. O.. 1966. Female sex pheromones as attractants for male codling moths. J. econ. Ent. 59: 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. A. and Macdonald, D. R.. 1966. Investigation of the sex attractant of the spruce budworm moth. Chemy Can., Sept. 1966.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. A., Macdonald, D. R., and Tang, C. S.. 1967. A synthetic attractant for the male spruce budworm moth, Choristoneura fumiferana. Ecperientia 23: 377–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaston, L. K. and Shorey, H. H.. 1964. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths IV: An apparatus for bioassaying the pheromones of six species. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 779–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, L. K., Shorey, H. H., and Saatio, C. A.. 1967. Insect population control by the use of sex pheromone to inhibit orientation between the sexes. Nature 213: 1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. In Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 31, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. and Feng, K. C.. 1967. Isolation and bioassay of the sex pheromone of the red-banded leaf roller, Argyrotaenia velutinana(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 1199–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1969. Extrusion of the female sex pheromone gland in the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 101: 760–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971. Daily activity pattern and sex pheromone specificity as sexual isolating mechanisms in two species of Choristoneura(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, Y., Noguchi, H., and Yushima, T.. 1969. Mating behavior of the smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes orana. Fischer von Röslerstamm, and evidence of sex pheromone production. Botyu-Kagaku 34: 97–101.Google Scholar