Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:59:26.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is soybean oil an effective repellent against Aedes aegypti?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Cory Campbell  and
Gerhard Gries
Cory Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Gerhard Gries*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soybean oil (SO) is considered an active ingredient in commercial BiteBlocker™ insect-repellent products. Our objective was to test mechanisms by which SO exhibits repellency, using the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae), as a representative blood-feeding insect. In dual-port glass-cage olfactometers, human hands treated with SO at various concentrations attracted as many mosquitoes as did untreated hands, indicating that SO has no long-range repellent effect. In contrast, hands treated with N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) attracted significantly fewer mosquitoes than did untreated control hands. In cage experiments, treating an area of a human forearm exposed to A. aegypti with SO provided no protection against bites, whereas treating it with DEET did. These results indicate that SO has no short-range or contact repellent properties. Both DEET and the BiteBlocker™ product conferred protection for periods similar to those previously reported. Based on our data, classification of SO as an active mosquito repellent should be reconsidered.

Résumé

L’huile de soja (SO) est considérée comme l'un des ingrédients actifs des produits insectifuges BiteBlockerMD. Notre objectif est de tester les mécanismes par lesquels SO effectue la répulsion en utilisant le moustique de la fièvre jaune, Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera : Culicidae), comme insecte piqueur représentatif. Dans des olfactomètres en cage de verre à deux ports, des mains humaines traitées avec SO à diverses concentrations attirent autant de moustiques que les mains non traitées, indiquant que SO n’a pas d'effet répulsif à longue portée. En revanche, des mains traitées avec du N,N-diéthyl-3-méthylbenzamine (DEET) attirent significativement moins de moustiques que les mains témoins non traitées. Dans des expériences en cage utilisant une section d'avant-bras humain exposée à A. aegypti, les sections traitées au SO n’apportent aucune protection contre les piqûres, alors que les sections traitées au DEET sont efficaces. Nos résultats indiquent que SO ne possède aucune propriété répulsive à courte portée ou par contact. Le DEET et le produit BiteBlockerMD fournissent des périodes de protection semblables à celles indiquées précédemment. D’après nos données, on devrait revoir la classification de SO comme répulsif actif de moustiques.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 142 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 405 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amer, A., and Melhorn, H. 2006. Repellency of forty-one essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex mosquitoes. Parasitology Research, 99: 478–490. PMID:16642384 doi:10.1007/s00436-006-0184-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badolo, A., Ilboudo-Sanogo, E., Ouèdraogo, A.P., and Costantini, C. 2004. Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 9: 330–334. PMID:14996361 doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01206.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnard, D.R. 1999. Repellency of essential oils to mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 36: 625–629. PMID:10534958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnard, D.R., and Xue, R.D. 2004. Laboratory evaluation of mosquito repellents against Aedes albopictus, Culex nigripalpus, and Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 41: 726–730. PMID:15311467 doi:10.1603/0022-2585-41.4.726.Google Scholar
Bhuyan, M., Saxena, B.N., and Rao, K.M. 1974. Repellent property of oil fraction of garlic, Allium sativum, Linn. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 12: 575–576. PMID:4464270.Google ScholarPubMed
Costantini, C., Badolo, A., and Ilboudo-Sanogo, E. 2004. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes. Transcripts of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 98: 644–652. PMID:15363644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fradin, M.S., and Day, J.F. 2002. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. New England Journal of Medicine, 347: 13–18. PMID:12097535 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A.A., Maibach, H.J., and Skidmore, D.L. 1975. Addition of vanillin to mosquito repellents to increase protection time. Mosquito News, 35: 223–225.Google Scholar
Kline, D.L., Bernier, U.R., Posey, K.H., and Barnard, D.R. 2003. Olfactometric evaluation of spatial repellents for Aedes aegypti. Journal of Medical Entomology, 40: 463–467. PMID:14680112 doi:10.1603/0022-2585-40.4.463.Google Scholar
Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA). 1999. Soybean oil: proposed regulatory decision document; PRDD99-02. Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA). 2000. Soybean oil insect repellents for personal use (Blocker™ Series): regulatory decision document; RDD2000-1. Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Pest Control Products Act of Canada. 2002. Definition of “active ingredient.” c. 28. P-9.01. Sect. 2(1).Google Scholar
Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA). 2004. Re-evaluation of citronella oil and related active compounds for use as personal insect repellents; proposed acceptability for continuing registration; PACR2004-36. Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Qiu, H.C., Jun, H.W., and McCall, J.W. 1998. Pharmacokinetics, formulation, and safety of insect repellent N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet): a review. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 14: 12–27. PMID:9599319.Google ScholarPubMed
Rutledge, L.C., and Gupta, R.K. 2006. Animal models for research and development of insect repellents for human use. In Insect repellents: principles, methods and uses. Edited by Debboun, M., Frances, S.P., and Strickman, D.. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2008. SAS®. Release 9.1: SAS help and documentation. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Schreck, C.E., and McGovern, T.P. 1989. Repellents and other personal protection strategies against Aedes albopictus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 5: 247–250. PMID:2746209.Google Scholar
Traboulsi, A.F., El-Haj, S., Tueni, M., Taoubi, K., Nader, N.A., and Mrad, A. 2005. Repellency and toxicity of aromatic plant extracts against the mosquito Culex pipiens molestus (Diptera: Culicidae). Pest Management Science, 61: 597–604. PMID:15662650 doi:10.1002/ps.1017.Google Scholar
Trigg, J.K. 1996. Evaluation of a eucalyptus-based repellent against Anopheles spp. in Tanzania. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 12: 243–246. PMID:8827599.Google ScholarPubMed
Trongtokit, Y., Rongsriyam, Y., Komalamisra, N., and Apiwathnasorn, C. 2005. Comparative repellency of 38 essential oils against mosquito bites. Phytotherapy Research, 19: 303–309. PMID: 16041723 doi:10.1002/ptr.1637.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1954. Chemicals evaluated as insecticides and repellents at Orlando, FLA. Agricultural Handbook No. 69, Entomology Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1967. Materials evaluated as insecticides, repellents, and chemosterilants at Orlando and Gainesville, FLA., 1952–1964. Agricultural Handbook No. 340, Entomology Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1996. Exemption of certain pesticide substances from federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act requirements. Final Rule. Environmental Protection Agency. March 6, 1996. 40 CFR 152.25 (g).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). 1996. Report of the WHO informal consultation on the evaluation and testing of insecticides. Informal Consultation 96.1,WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme, Control of Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar