Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:27:34.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTEGRATED CONTROL OF ORCHARD MITES ON APPLE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. S. Downing
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Summerland, British Columbia
J. C. Arrand
Affiliation:
Farm Products Finance Branch, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, British Columbia

Abstract

In 1965, strains of the predaceous phytoseiid mite, Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt, had developed resistance to azinphosmethyl, one of the organophosphate insecticides used to control the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella (L.). From 1966 to 1968, trials with integrated mite control in growers’ orchards were carried out successfully preserving the predator T. occidentalis. In most cases, an application of oil at the half-inch green bud stage was applied. The integrated concept of orchard mite control was recommended to the British Columbia fruit industry in 1969 and gained wide acceptance. In 1974, a survey of eight of the original integrated control orchards revealed that none of them had been treated with a summer acaricide since 1968. In six orchards, application of oil at the half-inch green bud stage had been used annually but two had not even received the oil spray. In all the orchards there was a good biological balance of a few predators and a few prey.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collyer, E. 1964. The effect of an alternative food supply on the relationship between two Typhlodromus species and Panonychus ulmi (Koch) (Acarina). Entomologia exp. appl. 7: 120124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, R. S. 1966 a. Quinoxalines as orchard acaricides in British Columbia. Can. Ent. 98: 134138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, R. S. 1966 b. The effect of certain miticides on the predaceous mites, Neoseiulus caudiglans (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Plant Sci. 46: 521524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, R. S. 1967. Petroleum oils in orchard mite control. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 64: 1013.Google Scholar
Downing, R. S. 1967. A guide for determining when to spray for mites on apple trees in an integrated control program. June 1974, mimeo.Google Scholar
Downing, R. S. and Arrand, J. C.. 1968. Integrated control of orchard mites in British Columbia. B.C. Dep. Agric. Publ. 68–4.Google Scholar
Downing, R. S. and Arrand, J. C.. 1968. How to collect and handle leaf samples for use in a mite brushing machine. February 1970, mimeo.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. F. and McBurnie, H. Y.. 1943. Sampling technique for determining populations of citrus red mite and its predators. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 671.Google Scholar
Hoyt, S. C. 1969. Integrated chemical control of insects and biological control of mites on apple in Washington. J. econ. Ent. 62: 7486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. V. G., Chant, D. A., Anderson, N. H., and Ayre, G. L.. 1955. Methods for estimating orchard mite populations, especially with the mite brushing machine. Can. Ent. 87: 189200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. V. G. and Anderson, N. H.. 1958. Notes on parathion-resistant strains of two phytophagous mites and a predacious mite in British Columbia. Can. Ent. 90: 9297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar