Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:17:38.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insects and Physiological Research1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Extract

In the foreword to the initial issue of the “Journal of Insect Physiology”, v. B. Wigglesworth states: “–the key to many of the fundamental problems of physiology may perhaps be found most readily among the insects” (15). This expresses a viewpoint that he and others have enunciated on previous occasions (10, 14). It is well substantiated by a consideration of the general and particular characteristics of insects and the contributions that have been made to general physiology through their study.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1.Dethier, V. G. 1956. in Molecular Structure and Functional Activities of Nerve Cells. pp. 130. American Institute of Biological Science, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
2.Fraenkel, G. 1951. Effect and distribution of vitamin BT. Archiv. Biochem. Biophys. 34: 457–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Fraenkel, G., 1953. Studies on the distribution of vitamin BT (carnitine). Biol. Bull. 104: 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hodgson, E. S., Lettvin, J. Y. and Roeder, K. D.. 1955. The physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science 122: 417–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Hodgson, E. S. 1958. Chemoreception in arthropods. Ann. Rev. Ent. 3: 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Howden, H. F. 1957. Investigations on sterility and deformities of Onthophagus (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae) induced by gamma radiation. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 50: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Keilin, D. 1925. On cytochrome, a respiratory pigment, common to animals, yeast, and higher plants. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) (B) 98: 312–39.Google Scholar
8.Minnich, D. E. 1921. An experimental study of the tarsal chemoreceptors of two nymphlid butterflies. J. Exper. Zool. 33: 173203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Minnich, D. E., 1926. The chemical sensitivity of the tarsi of certain muscid flies. Biol. Bull. 51: 166178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Roeder, K. D. 1952. Insects as experimental material. Science 115: 275280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Sacktor, B. 1953. Investigations on the mitochondria of the housefly, Musca domestica L. II Oxidative enzymes with special reference to malic oxidase. Archiv. Bioch. Ent. Biophys. 45: 349–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Sanborn, R. C. and Williams, C. M.. 1950. The cytochrome system in the cecropia silkworm with special reference to the properties of a new component. J. Gen. Physiol. 33: 579–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Spector, W. S. (Ed.) 1956. Handbook of Biological Data. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
14.Wigglesworth, V. B. 1948. The insect as a medium for the study of physiology. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 135, B, 430446.Google Scholar
15.Wigglesworth, V. B., 1957. Foreword: J. Insect. Physiol. 1: 12.Google Scholar
16.Williams, C. M. 1950. Mitochondria in the flight muscles of insects. J. Gen. Physiol. 34: 675–90.Google Scholar
17.Williams, C. M., 1951. Biochemical mechanisms in insect growth and metamorphosis. Federation Proc. 10: 546–52.Google ScholarPubMed