Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T14:07:49.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insects Affecting Seed Production in Red Pine: Part I Conophthorus resinosae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. A. Lyons
L. A. Lyons
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Natural and artificial reforestation, which basically depend on an abundance of sound seed, are adversely affected when insects destroy large numbers of cones, seeds, and cone-bearing shoots. Other factors, such as unfavourable weather, incomplete seed development, and damage by birds and mammals also reduce seed production, but they are rarely of such widespread importance as insects, whose damage often results in the failure of seed crops over large areas. Cone and seed insects sometimes restrict the natural regeneration of trees for a few years at a time, as, for example, in conifers on the Pacific coast (16), loblolly pines in Virginia (13), and oak in Michigan (5), but they become particularly important when the seeds they destroy are required for use in artificial reforestation. The future success of much reforestation, which is inclining more and more toward the use of seed obtained from trees cultivated especially for that purpose, may largely depend on a thorough understanding of cone and seed insects and their effect on seed production.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 88 , Issue 10 , October 1956 , pp. 599 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Bedard, W. D. 1933. The number of larval instars and the approximate length of the larval stadia of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk., with a method for their determination in relation to other bark beetles, J. Econ. Ent. 26: 1128–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Blackman, M. W. 1915. Observations on the life history and habits of Pityogenes hopkinsi Swaine. N.Y. State Coll. For., Tech. Bull. 16: 11–66.Google Scholar
(3)Chamberlin, W. J. Bark and timber beetles of North America north of Mexico. Oregon State Coll. Co-op, Assoc, Corvallis, Oregon, 1939.Google Scholar
(4)Craighead, F. C. 1950. Insect enemies of eastern forests. U.S.D.A. Misc. Pub. 657.Google Scholar
(5)Graham, S. A. 1952. Forest entomology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
(6)Green, G. W. 1954. Some laboratory investigations of the light reactions of the larvae of Neodiprion americanus banksianae Roh. and N. lecontei (Fitch) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Ent. 86: 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Hamilton, J. 1893. List of Coleoptera taken at Sparrow Lake, Ontario. Can. Ent. 25: 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Harrington, W. H. 1891. Notes on a few Canadian Rhyncophora. Can. Ent. 23: 26–27.Google Scholar
(9)Harrington, W. H. 1902. Notes on Pityophthorus coniperda Schwarz. Can. Ent. 34: 72–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Hopkins, A. D. 1915. A new genus of scolytid beetles. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 5: 429–433.Google Scholar
(11)Kaston, B. J. and Riggs, D. S.. 1937. Studies on the larvae of the native elm bark beetle. J. Econ. Ent. 30: 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Keen, F. P. 1952. Insect enemies of western forests. U.S.D.A. Misc. Pub. 273.Google Scholar
(13)Knight, F. B. 1952. Insect damage to loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) cones. Virginia Forests 7: 14–15.Google Scholar
(14)Little, E. L. (Jr.) 1943. Common insects on piñon (Pinus edulis). J.N.Y. Ent. Soc. 51: 239–252.Google Scholar
(15)Lyons, L. A. 1951. Insects affecting seed production in red pine. Can. Dept. Agr., Div. For. Biol. Bi-monthly Prog. Rept. 7(3): 1.Google Scholar
(16)Miller, J. M. 1914. Insect damage to cones and seeds of Pacific coast conifers. U.S.D.A. Bull. 95.Google Scholar
(17)Miller, J. M. 1915. Cone beetles: injury to sugar pine and western yellow pine. U.S.D.A. Bull. 243.Google Scholar
(18)Packard, A. S. 1890. Fifth report of the U.S. Entomological Commission: 810.Google Scholar
(19)Prebble, M. L. 1933. The larval development of three bark beetles. Can. Ent. 65: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Schwarz, E. A. 1895. Description of the pine-cone-inhabiting scolytid. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 3: 143–145.Google Scholar
(21)Struble, G. R. 1937. The fir engraver beetle, a serious enemy of white fir and red fir. U.S.D.A. Circ. 419.Google Scholar
(22)Struble, G. R. 1949. Twig damage in sugar pine caused by the cone beetle. J. For. 45: 48–50.Google Scholar
(23)Swaine, J. M. 1918. Canadian bark beetles. Part II. A preliminary classification, with an account of the habits and means of control. Dom. Can. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 14.Google Scholar
(24)Tripp, H. A. 1954. Description and habits of the spruce seedworm (Laspeyresia youngana (Kft.) (Lepidoptera: Oletlireutidae). Can. Ent. 86: 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar