Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:32:38.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INHABITANTS (HYMENOPTERA: CYNIPIDAE, CHALCIDOIDEA) OF THE CYNIPIDOUS GALLS OF QUERCUS BOREALIS IN NOVA SCOTIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. F. Brookfield
J. F. Brookfield
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although heterogony has yet to be proved for the oak gall producing species of Cynipidae, Plagiotrochus tumificus O.S. and P. scitula Bass., the laboratory rearing of the male and female individuals from the vernal galls of these two species indicates that the mother insects in the former species are mostly amphitokous, while those in P. scitula are arrhenotokous and thelytokous. Amphitoky is shown for Callirliytis operator O.S. which is known to be heterogenous.Cynipid inquilines and chalcid parasites were reared from several cynipidous oak galls in the area. The inquiline and parasite fauna of any particular gall depend on the form of the gall and not on the species of the gall producing cynipid. None of the inquilines and parasites reared in this study is identical with known palearctic species. Most individual inquilines and parasites emerging from the vernal galls emerge in the summer, but a few overwinter in these galls and do not emerge until the following spring.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 7 , July 1972 , pp. 1123 - 1133
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, H. 1894. Alternating generations, a biological study of oak galls and gall flies. (Edited by Straton, .) Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Askew, R. R. 1961. On the biology of oak galls of Cynipidae (Hymenoptera) in Britain. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 14: 237–268.Google Scholar
Balduf, W. V. 1926. On the bionomics of some Hymenoptera from a bur oak cynipid gall. Can. Ent. 58: 135–143, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, H. F. 1863. Descriptions of several supposed new species of Cynips, with remarks on the formation of certain galls. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 2: 323–333.Google Scholar
Beutenmuller, W. 1909. Article VI — The species of Amphibolips and their galls. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 26: 47–66.Google Scholar
Doncaster, L. 1909. Gametogenesis of the gall-fly, Neuroterus lenticularis (Spathegaster baccarum), I. Proc. R. Soc. (B) 82: 88–113.Google Scholar
Felt, E. P. 1965. Plant galls and gall makers. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
Folliot, R. 1964. Contribution à l'étude de la biologie des Cynipides Gallicoles (Hyménoptères, Cynipoidea). Annls Sci. nat. Zool. 5: 407–564.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C. 1920. Life histories of American Cynipidae. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 42: 319–357.Google Scholar
Malyshev, S. I. 1968. Genesis of Hymenoptera. Methuen, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osten Sacken, R. 1865. Contributions to the natural history of the Cynipidae of the United States and their galls. Proc. 4th ent. Soc. Philad. 4: 331–380.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. T. 1928. Sexes in the Cynipidae and male-producing and female-producing lines. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 54(3): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weld, L. H. 1928. Cynipid galls of the Chicago area. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 20: 142–177.Google Scholar